Welcome to your hub for enterprise data protection discussions. Learn more about recent changes to the VOX Community here.
Forum Widgets
Recent Discussions
Different networks on Flex Appliances
Hi Guys, I hope you can help me with this, our customer bought 2 Flex Appliances 5350 and we have clients from two different network segments (192.168.x.x and 10.70.) I´m not sure about the deployment, the whole idea is to have only one MSDP server and only one worm server. Does anyone knows how to configure this? How the cabling would go? My idea is to cable two ports to each switch and then assign each link aggregation on each instance, am I right?AndresV2 months agoLevel 611Views0likes0CommentsFlex Appliance support for iSCSI
Hi folks, Does anyone know if Flex Appliance supports iSCSI, as we intend to use the MediaServer application as our "Backup Host" for Nutanix AHV cluster backup, which will require iSCSI protocol to perform the backup through Nutanix's "iSCSI data services IP address". If not, this mean that we'll have to configure a separate Server/VM with iSCSI, right ? Regards.Solved47Views0likes2CommentsFlex appliance physical ports configuration
Hi folks, We have one concern regarding ports allocation for our new Flex appliance, which has 6 x 10/25 GE ports (3 Dual Port cards) and one 4 x 1GE card. We want to set : Bond0 with 2 ports for the Primary Server instance. Bond1 with 4 ports for the Media Server instance (MSDP). Our concern is regarding the subnet, is it possible to create multiple Bond interfaces using the same subnet as our instances will be assigned IPs from the same subnet (Backup subnet). For example : Backup subnet is 192.168.0.0/24, we would have : Primary Server : Bond0 with 192.168.0.1. Media Server : Bond1 with 192.168.0.2. We know that we can create one 6 ports bond interface with the 192.168.0.0 subnet and assign this same bond for both Primary and Media with different IPs. But with this configuration, we think that it won't physically isolate the traffic of Media instance from Primary instance, and we want to achieve some sort of QoS, and make sure that the Media Server will have the most of the bandwidth as it will be the one which transitions the backup data from our clients. Also, we want to use Flex's "Remote Replication" feature with another Flex appliance (Same Specs), can we use the remaining 1GE interface ports ? (3 ports bonded as 3 GE logical port) as the first port is used by the appliance as management port (Host0). As we know, replication only concerns the primary server instance, so there's no significant data transfer. Regards,Solved196Views0likes3CommentsFlex Appliance Sizing
Hi Guys, I'm new to Netbackup products, even more so to its Appliances. We've received a new Flex 5260 appliance, which we're going to configure. Before starting the configuration, we're consulting the Veritas documentation to better understand how the device works. For a first review, two questions come to mind: Size of the application instances volumes : In our Appliance, we'll create two instances, one Primary and one MediaServer (MSDP); How can we get NBU recommendations regarding volumes sizes ? (Primary Catalog, MSDP, AdvDisk, Staging ... Etc). In the configuration of a new MediaServer instance, we came across the following volumes : MSDP, AdvancedDisk, Staging. And since we are going to use Dedup, then automatically we'll create an MSDP volume. In this case, should we set AdvancedDisk and Staging to 0 GB ? What is the purpose of the "Staging volume" ? Is there any sort of Sizing Tool provided by Veritas for this purpose ? To get the right requirements for each component depending on the environment to be backed up (Number of clients, FET, BET ...etc.) Thanks in advance for any provided guidance. Regards.132Views0likes5Commentsfailed disks
Hello, We have an appliance 5250 S series with two shelves 2u12 we get 2 disks failure (1 disk on each shelf), a hot spare drive from each shelf has replaced a failed disk we have opened an SR with veritas and they are shpping two new disks our question is the following : what is the situation if another disk get failed before we recieved the new disks? knowing that the volumes are pre configured with raid6 , does the data will be lost ? Thanks for your answers :)Riadh_R174 months agoLevel 516Views0likes2CommentsFlex OS version 3.0 is not really compatible with 10.3.0.1 NBU version?
Hello, We are aware that the flex OS version 3.0 is not compatible with NBU version 10.3.0.1 however we have this scenario that we are required to upgrade the NBU Primary/master server to version 10.3.0.1.The primary/master server is BYO (physical server, not an instance of that flex appliance) but the disk pool is one of the instance of that flex. If we proceed to upgrade the primary/master server, Do you know if the backup and restore will not be working after upgrade since they are not compatible? Note: We have currently issue with flex OS upgrade to the latest one that's why upgrade of OS is not possible right now.justjuls6 months agoLevel 313Views0likes1Comment