Michael_De_Simo
20 years agoLevel 3
Find out what jobs *should* have run
Hi,
Simple question: I need to know what jobs should have run in the past, specifically last night.
Details, background etc.
We are dealing with a problem where we have "phantom" jobs. These jobs queue up but will never run - ever. The problem is there is no way to differentiate these jobs from jobs that should be run. We have a separate team tracking that issue specifically. My task is to try and figure out if the jobs that were supposed to have run actually ran. But, since I am joining this effort late, am somewhat behind the curve and did not get a list of all the masters this could be happening on. I had new server added to my list this morning that had the problem last night. In the future, like for tonight's window, I know I can use bpsched -predict to find out what runs tonight then run bperror tomorrow and with some fancy footwork determine if everything that should have run did (and did that for the servers in my list who of course did not exhibit the problem).
Thanks,
Mike D.Message was edited by:
Michael De Simone
Simple question: I need to know what jobs should have run in the past, specifically last night.
Details, background etc.
We are dealing with a problem where we have "phantom" jobs. These jobs queue up but will never run - ever. The problem is there is no way to differentiate these jobs from jobs that should be run. We have a separate team tracking that issue specifically. My task is to try and figure out if the jobs that were supposed to have run actually ran. But, since I am joining this effort late, am somewhat behind the curve and did not get a list of all the masters this could be happening on. I had new server added to my list this morning that had the problem last night. In the future, like for tonight's window, I know I can use bpsched -predict to find out what runs tonight then run bperror tomorrow and with some fancy footwork determine if everything that should have run did (and did that for the servers in my list who of course did not exhibit the problem).
Thanks,
Mike D.Message was edited by:
Michael De Simone