undejj
16 years agoLevel 3
BESR 8.5.5 and BEWS 11d Coexisting on Network - Any Advantage?
I apologize in advance because I am sure that this question has been asked and answered before but I can't locate a good resource - if someone could direct me to the answer I would very much appreciate.
I have both BESR 8.5.5 and BEWS 11d in our environment, on different servers. I had been using BEWS exclusively until a month ago when we purchased BESR.
Now that I have had some time to evaluate the features of BESR, I have to question whether BEWS provides us with any additional benefit.
If the only benefit of BEWS is backup to tape and assuming that I still think tape media is a valuable form of storage, then I suppose I could use BEWS to backup my BESR image files.
Are there any arguments supporting continued use of both products? It seems that I could achieve all of my objectives by using only BESR - full system backups, file backups, incremental backups and restores, backup to disk, offsite storage, disaster recovery, disaster recovery to different hardware ..
- If you have servers running MS Exchange, Oracle, SQL etc., you can take brick-level backup using BEWS; BESR can't do this. BESR is only meant for taking image backup and file backup of servers, you won't get that much of flexibility compared to BEWS.
Using BEWS along with Desktop Laption Option you can take backup of client machines (Linux, Win XP etc.) from a centralized management server, BESR can't do this.
Backup Exec System Recovery Disk is helpful for recovering image backup in a crashed server or bare metal server in a very short span of time, BEWS can't do this.
Basically for disaster recovery or bare metal recovery, BESR is the best and for Centralized file/folder level backup BEWS is the best.