Thank you for the information Ketank,
A few of questions come from it.. first one I'd think about is, who'd store the metadata to rehydrate the image, is that being sent to the tape also or retained in Comvault ?
The second one would be for the Comvault devs, and that's how did they workaround the slow random access reading from tape impossibility? ( I thought it was possible to write deduped data to tape, but reading requires a 2 stage process ).
Well.. before assumming too much I'll definitely read about Comvault, and how it works... because the space reduction as you say, would be a major saving.
Thank you very much Ketank.
