05-01-2007 12:02 PM
05-02-2007 08:40 AM
05-02-2007 09:01 AM
05-03-2007 09:49 AM
Message Edited by Nick Pearce on 05-03-200709:50 AM
05-03-2007 11:52 AM
05-03-2007 12:41 PM
Well that is good news. Jared, you kind of opened a can of worms though... So even in testing i still notice a lot of data transfer even when i make a 1 letter change to a 1 k txt file. It still copies about 5 MB across to the Protection Server. Any thoughts as to that? is there any overhead its doing?.
Next Question: For a DR scenario. Is there a better practice then what i am about to describe.
Server in Site A (protected server) Crashes
Share out Live CPS data on Site B (Protected Server)
Users make changes to data
Server is rebuilt offline.
Copy of Data from Site B is sent to Site A and put back on Protected Server (offline)
Stop user access for Site B
Take Snapshot of Site B
Turn on CPS Job between Site A and B
After Sync is done Do a restore from the previous taken snapshot from Site B to A (From Protection Server to Protected Server) the protected server should then have all changes made while server was offline.
This works but is there a better way?
Also I read that above Post saying build 7170 is crashing alot and the user recommending Microsoft DPM...
So a couple questions . 1 Where can i get build 7170 (live update isnt downloading it) and 2. Your thoughts about Microsoft DPM? why is CPS better?
Thanks sorry for the loaded post.
05-03-2007 01:02 PM
05-03-2007 03:54 PM
05-03-2007 04:08 PM
05-04-2007 05:36 AM
05-04-2007 11:28 AM
Jared, I am a little concerned. We have been vigorously testing the bit level changed and have noticed that it sends the full file every time. For instance
We have a 2MB Power Point Presentation
I change 1 letter on 1 slide and save and 6 MB gets transferred to the Protection Server.
We have verified this with our netflow device.
Suggestions?
05-04-2007 11:33 AM
05-04-2007 11:38 AM
05-04-2007 11:56 AM
05-04-2007 12:41 PM
05-04-2007 03:37 PM
05-05-2007 10:54 PM
05-07-2007 09:04 AM
05-07-2007 09:24 AM