11-03-2011 12:37 AM
Hi all!
I know what is VSS - it's point in time whole volume snapshoot and it's used with AOFO.
How is the difference between SQL backup perform with and without AOFO selcted for job?
Two are running good.
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-03-2011 10:22 AM
11-03-2011 12:46 AM
You should not turn on AOFO when you are backing up SQL databases. You may encounter difficulties when you try to do a re-directed restore of the databases.
11-03-2011 02:08 AM
Also if you just turn on AOFO and attempt to backup the SQL files, they won't backup due to active File Exclusion - as such you should use the SQL Agent and do a specific SQL backup
11-03-2011 02:15 AM
I forgot to add that I use SQL Agent!
So, is there a difference between SQL Agent backup and SQL base files copy by AOFO?
11-03-2011 02:21 AM
Hi
When you backup by SQL agent you backup the database that is online backup
When you backup that using AOFO agent without SQL agent that is like flat file backup & in that database file will not be backuped
So best is to use SQL agent to do backup with
Thanks
11-03-2011 03:42 AM
As Colin said, you cannot just backup the .mdf and the .ldf files like ordinary files. They are automatically excluded by the Automatic File Exclusion facility.
You should always backup your SQL databases using the SQL agent and make sure that you turn AOFO off in the job.
11-03-2011 05:10 AM
Yes, I know, I agree but...
It's very convenient for me to prepare one FULL backup job for all systems including SQL, Exchange and Windows System.
So, what will happen in case after I check to use AOFO and the same backup job will use SQL Agent for SQL instance backup?
Regular files will be backed up with AOFO (it's obvious)... and SQL will be backed up by SQL Agent?
If yes, should I understand that in case SQL Agent is licensed at medai server it's always used, isn't?
11-03-2011 05:19 AM
If Exchange 2003 it MUST be in a separate job from AOFO (unless you want to live with very limited restore options anyway.)
11-03-2011 05:49 AM
...just to add to what Colin said, using AOFO with SQL doesn't allow you to redirect a restore to another SQL server...I've experienced that already.
If you want to know how you should split your job, read the article below...
https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/articles/backing-databases-and-files-same-tape-separate-jobs-using-backup-exec |
11-03-2011 07:53 AM
I did it minute ago and I managed to redirect SQL database to different SQL server.
Look at the backup job report.
Guys, how would you explain tha I can use AOFO for SQL backup?
11-03-2011 08:04 AM
Hi
No need to use AOFO for SQL backup as you have got specific agent to backup SQL
Please check link for best practisces to backup SQL using SQL agent
http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO21793
Hope that helps
Thanks
11-03-2011 10:02 AM
Thanks a lot but I still don't understand one thing...
Is AOFO feature checked works when BE process SQL backup using SQL Agent?
In my opinion 'yes, it works' but I don't understand dependiences. When I look at tha tape content (Restore function) I can find backups like on picture enclosed.
Both of these backup were made with SQL Agent, fist one with AOFO feature checked.
Do they differ?
11-03-2011 10:22 AM
11-03-2011 10:54 AM
...BE will use VSS anyway to back up a server, including DBs like Exchange & SQL...and believe me when I say this, when using AOFO I couldn't redirect a SQL restore...like I couldn't clear Exchange logs. YOu might not get the same issue, but you will end up with some sort of issue.
And if it's good enough to be documented by Symantec, it's good enough to be followed!