12-16-2009 09:43 AM
The problem details are:
Description:
Stopped working
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: CLR20r3
Problem Signature 01: bkupexec.exe
Problem Signature 02: 12.5.2213.152
Problem Signature 03: 4addee38
Problem Signature 04: mscorlib
Problem Signature 05: 2.0.0.0
Problem Signature 06: 4a7cb192
Problem Signature 07: 2d18
Problem Signature 08: 79
Problem Signature 09: System.Security.Security
OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.305.9
Locale ID: 1033
Any ideas or suggestions?
12-16-2009 08:06 PM
12-17-2009 04:05 AM
12-17-2009 04:17 AM
12-18-2009 01:08 PM
12-18-2009 01:10 PM
12-24-2009 11:46 AM
01-04-2010 06:16 AM
01-09-2010 04:55 AM
01-12-2010 03:48 AM
01-13-2010 06:23 AM
Hi,
We would like to investigate this further and do request your help for the same.
Can you please try the following steps :
1. Visit http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx and download the Procmon utility from the site.
2.Launch the console with the Procmon utility and the Sgmon utility running in the background.
3.After the error message comes up, save the Procmon log, Sgmon log and the VXGather log from the Backup Exec server.
Note: Do not add any filters in the Procmon utility and please do save the logs in the PML format itself.
4.Also, could you please go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Classes\.pdf and check if the user account you are logged on with has permissions on this key.
We would really appreciate if you could please send us a screen shot of the permissions on this key in the registry.
Please refer the below technotes if you need assistance in running the Sgmon debugging utility or in collecting the VXGather logs.
Using the Backup Exec Debug Monitor (SGMon) for troubleshooting
http://support.veritas.com/docs/309683
How to collect Backup Exec for Windows Servers log file information needed by Symantec Technical Support for troubleshooting purposes (using VxGather 1.2.2)
http://support.veritas.com/docs/318474
How to schedule Live Debugging with Backup Exec for Windows Servers using the SGMon utility
http://support.veritas.com/docs/329711
Regards,
Anoop
01-15-2010 09:23 AM
01-17-2010 07:48 PM
01-18-2010 09:08 AM
Hi,
As mentioned earlier, this issue is under investigation and we sincerely do request your help to investigate this further.
We would be really grateful if anyone of you could please send us the information I have requested for in my earlier post.
Also, could you please let us know if by any chance, Backup Exec System Recovery 2010
(BESR 2010 ) was installed on the media server before Backup Exec 12.5/2010 was installed on the same server .
Please keep us posted.
Regards,
Anoop
01-18-2010 10:55 AM
01-19-2010 02:00 AM
01-20-2010 03:00 AM
Hi,
Kindly refer the workarounds suggested in the technotes below and please lets us know if they have helped resolve this issue.
The Backup Exec for Windows 12.5 Services fail to start on a 64-bit Operating System after installation on a server with a pre-existing installation of Backup Exec System Recovery 2010.
http://support.veritas.com/docs/340426
When launching the Backup Exec console, a security warning "The Backup Exec user interface can only be run as a fully trusted application under .NET security policies." is encountered.
http://support.veritas.com/docs/340263
Regards,
Anoop
01-21-2010 12:03 PM
01-27-2010 02:39 PM
01-28-2010 09:27 AM
EDIT: After returning to the registry I found that after getting full control additional registry entries appeared, I took control of the new ones, refreshing each time to check for more. Now I am able to start every service in the application (Backup Exec Remote starts ok, Backup Device and Media starts ok) exept the Backup Exec Server service. In the error log the following errors appear:
"The Backup Exec Server Service detected a schema version mismatch. "
"Faulting application beserver.exe, version 12.5.2213.158, time stamp 0x4ad4dc70, faulting module ntdll.dll, version 6.0.6002.18005, time stamp 0x49e0421d, exception code 0xc0000005, fault offset 0x000000000002592a, process id 0xd68, application start time 0x01caa03e4669c023."
Given that I was able to get this far simply working in the registry it appears that it's mostly a registry issue, at least in my case. I'll see what else I can turn up...