cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted

ORA-600 [ksfd_odmcrt8], [ODM ERROR V-41-4-1-105-22 Invalid argument]

hi..

 

when we open db (Oracle 11.2.0.4 2node RAC in HP), we got the error...

 

Sun Jun 01 23:19:24 2014 
ALTER SYSTEM SET local_listener=' (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)(PORT=1521))' SCOPE=MEMORY SID='MNP001'; 
ALTER DATABASE MOUNT /* db agent *//* {1:15272:181} */ 
This instance was first to mount 
Errors in file /oracle/MNP/saptrace/diag/rdbms/mnp/MNP001/trace/MNP001_ckpt_230.trc (incident=432209): 
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [ksfd_odmopn2], [ODM ERROR V-41-4-2-313-22 Invalid argument], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] 
Incident details in: /oracle/MNP/saptrace/diag/rdbms/mnp/MNP001/incident/incdir_432209/MNP001_ckpt_230_i432209.trc

 

 

[PROD spncpd01:/#] mount -p

.......................

/dev/vg00/lvol10             /maxigent50           vxfs    ioerror=mwdisable,largefiles,qio,delaylog,dev=4000000a             0 0
/dev/vg00/lvol11             /SIMPANA              vxfs    ioerror=mwdisable,largefiles,qio,delaylog,dev=4000000b             0 0
xx.xx.89.167:/snctrans       /usr/sap/trans        nfs     rsize=32768,wsize=32768,NFSv3,dev=4000002                          0 0
xx.xx.89.167:/sncmnp         /sapmnt/MNP           nfs     rsize=32768,wsize=32768,NFSv3,dev=4000003                          0 0
xx.xx.89.167:/sapimage       /sapcd                nfs     rsize=32768,wsize=32768,NFSv3,dev=4000004                          0 0
-hosts                       /net                  autofs  ignore,indirect,nosuid,soft,nobrowse,dev=4000005                   0 0
/dev/odm                     /dev/odm              odm     smartsync,dev=4000006                                              0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg1/mnpomnp   /oracle/MNP           vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=20059d8   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg1/mnpstage  /oracle/stage/112_64  vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=20059d9   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg1/mnpcli    /oracle/client        vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=20059da   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg3/mnpocr1   /oracle/OCR1          vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=2009858   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg3/mnpvote1  /oracle/VOTE1         vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=2009859   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg4/mnpocr2   /oracle/OCR2          vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=200c350   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg4/mnpvote2  /oracle/VOTE2         vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=200c351   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg5/mnpocr3   /oracle/OCR3          vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=200e678   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg5/mnpvote3  /oracle/VOTE3         vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=200e679   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg1/mnploga   /oracle/MNP/origlogA  vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=20059db   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg1/mnplogb   /oracle/MNP/origlogB  vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=20059dc   0 0
/dev/vx/dsk/ncpdg1/mnpmloga  /oracle/MNP/mirrlogA  vxfs    ioerror=mdisable,largefiles,qio,cluster,crw,delaylog,dev=20059dd   0 0

 

<--- no using  CIO

so, we   can  not  use    veritas odm library...

 

could you teach me,    how  we can use veritas odm library ???  ( Is there any issue in  veritas / Oracle  ?? )

 

Thanks~~~~

5 Replies
Highlighted

I am not sure why you are

I am not sure why you are saying you can not use ODM.

Veritas ODM would help you to improve database performance by skipping the veritas level locking mechanism (GLM) because this function is already performed by RAC itself.

Do you have RAC installed with libraries linked to Veritas ? Refer below link

https://sort.symantec.com/public/documents/sfha/6.0/hp-ux/productguides/html/sfrac_install/ch17s01.htm

 

G

Highlighted

What is the version of SFRAC?

What is the version of SFRAC? Please review the compatibility matrix for the SF release and 11.2.0.4 RAC here:

http://www.symantec.com/business/support/resources/sites/BUSINESS/content/live/DOCUMENTATION/5000/DO...

Highlighted

hi.. Thanks for

hi.. Thanks for  reply..

1
#####################################
I am not sure why you are saying you can not use ODM.
-->

1> linked to Veritas libraries
and then 
2> sqlplus "/as sysdba"
   SQL> startup
   ORA-00600  [ksfd_odmopn2], [ODM ERROR V-41-4-2-313-22 Invalid argument]
   SQL>
so, we unlinked  to  Veritas libraries
3> sqlplus "/as sysdba"
 SQL> startup
 <-- ok..

we can not use Veritas libraries
 because  "ORA-00600  [ksfd_odmopn2], [ODM ERROR V-41-4-2-313-22 Invalid argument]"..


2
#####################################

[PROD spncpd01:/stand/current/mod#] what odm
odm:
         $Revision: odm:    VERITAS 5.1.00.00%dev perf version for 11.31 built by ( fsbuild @ malhar1 )
        odm:$RCSfile: koff.c,v $        $Revision: 1.23 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_node.c,v $    $Revision: 1.39 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_io.c,v $      $Revision: 1.115.4.1 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:05:24  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_kioctl.c,v $  $Revision: 1.119.8.3 $Date: 2013/04/17 15:15:58  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ted.c,v $     $Revision: 1.7.4.1 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:05:24  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        vxfs:$RCSfile: odm_ted_osdep.c,v $      $Revision: 1.2 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ops.c,v $     $Revision: 1.54 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_rops.c,v $    $Revision: 1.25 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_makename.c,v $        $Revision: 1.10 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_page.c,v $    $Revision: 1.36 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_clust.c,v $   $Revision: 1.73 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_raw.c,v $     $Revision: 1.36 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_vxfs.c,v $    $Revision: 1.43 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odmmod.c,v $      $Revision: 1.2 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm.c,v $ $Revision: 1.5.8.2 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:24:24  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_osrelk.c,v $  $Revision: 1.7.10.1 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:05:26  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_types.h,v $   $Revision: 1.10 $
        odm:$RCSfile$   $Revision$
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_osrelk.h,v $  $Revision: 1.5.10.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_os.h,v $      $Revision: 1.37 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm.h,v $ $Revision: 1.16 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ioctl.h,v $   $Revision: 1.26.24.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ops.h,v $     $Revision: 1.22 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_kioctl.h,v $  $Revision: 1.48.24.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ted.h,v $     $Revision: 1.10.4.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_vxvm.h,v $    $Revision: 1.3 $
        vxfs:$RCSfile: vx_odm.h,v $     $Revision: 4.18 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_clust.h,v $   $Revision: 1.33 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_io.h,v $      $Revision: 1.36.4.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_page.h,v $    $Revision: 1.14 $
        odm:$RCSfile: koff.h,v $        $Revision: 1.28 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm.modmeta,v $   $Revision: 1.2.40.1 $Date: 2011/12/05 09:39:25  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)

Highlighted

hi.. Thanks for

hi.. Thanks for  reply..

1
#####################################
I am not sure why you are saying you can not use ODM.
-->

1> linked to Veritas libraries
and then 
2> sqlplus "/as sysdba"
   SQL> startup
   ORA-00600  [ksfd_odmopn2], [ODM ERROR V-41-4-2-313-22 Invalid argument]
   SQL>
so, we unlinked  to  Veritas libraries
3> sqlplus "/as sysdba"
 SQL> startup
 <-- ok..

we can not use Veritas libraries
 because  "ORA-00600  [ksfd_odmopn2], [ODM ERROR V-41-4-2-313-22 Invalid argument]"..


2
#####################################

[PROD spncpd01:/stand/current/mod#] what odm
odm:
         $Revision: odm:    VERITAS 5.1.00.00%dev perf version for 11.31 built by ( fsbuild @ malhar1 )
        odm:$RCSfile: koff.c,v $        $Revision: 1.23 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_node.c,v $    $Revision: 1.39 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_io.c,v $      $Revision: 1.115.4.1 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:05:24  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_kioctl.c,v $  $Revision: 1.119.8.3 $Date: 2013/04/17 15:15:58  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ted.c,v $     $Revision: 1.7.4.1 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:05:24  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        vxfs:$RCSfile: odm_ted_osdep.c,v $      $Revision: 1.2 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ops.c,v $     $Revision: 1.54 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_rops.c,v $    $Revision: 1.25 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_makename.c,v $        $Revision: 1.10 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_page.c,v $    $Revision: 1.36 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_clust.c,v $   $Revision: 1.73 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_raw.c,v $     $Revision: 1.36 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_vxfs.c,v $    $Revision: 1.43 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odmmod.c,v $      $Revision: 1.2 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm.c,v $ $Revision: 1.5.8.2 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:24:24  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_osrelk.c,v $  $Revision: 1.7.10.1 $Date: 2013/04/09 10:05:26  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_types.h,v $   $Revision: 1.10 $
        odm:$RCSfile$   $Revision$
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_osrelk.h,v $  $Revision: 1.5.10.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_os.h,v $      $Revision: 1.37 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm.h,v $ $Revision: 1.16 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ioctl.h,v $   $Revision: 1.26.24.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ops.h,v $     $Revision: 1.22 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_kioctl.h,v $  $Revision: 1.48.24.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_ted.h,v $     $Revision: 1.10.4.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_vxvm.h,v $    $Revision: 1.3 $
        vxfs:$RCSfile: vx_odm.h,v $     $Revision: 4.18 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_clust.h,v $   $Revision: 1.33 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_io.h,v $      $Revision: 1.36.4.1 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm_page.h,v $    $Revision: 1.14 $
        odm:$RCSfile: koff.h,v $        $Revision: 1.28 $
        odm:$RCSfile: odm.modmeta,v $   $Revision: 1.2.40.1 $Date: 2011/12/05 09:39:25  $ PATCH_11.31 (PHKL_43538)

Highlighted

from the o/p above the vrts

from the o/p above the vrts odm version/SF version seems to be 5.1. If you review the SF supportability matix with RAC (link provided in my earlier post) .. you should be at SF 6.0.3 to have this working with 11.2.0.4.

For 5.1, see: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH173597 (the issu mentioned in this link is wrt 11.2.0.3 though)