02-28-2013 03:19 AM
Hi,
I am an admin with no formal training on DA (v10) and neither do our legal team. Yes I know, I know, unfortunatly, I don't control the purse strings!
Anyway, we have got as far as creating a case, searching and the legal team are in the process of reviewing the results. They are asking me how we mark an item as Privileged. Apparently this is some legal term where they don't have to show these emails to a court, or something like that.
Under Application --> Marks, we have
These pertain to buttons in the Review pane.
Should I go ahead and create the "privileged" mark or does this option come up later in the process.
Any pointers would be greatfully received.
Many thanks
W.
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-28-2013 03:51 AM
No you need to create the "Privilege" Mark. You can create the mark at the application level and then add it to the case where you want the mark to be used. By default the mark created at global level are available in every case and you have an option to select the marks that are available for use in each case.
02-28-2013 03:51 AM
No you need to create the "Privilege" Mark. You can create the mark at the application level and then add it to the case where you want the mark to be used. By default the mark created at global level are available in every case and you have an option to select the marks that are available for use in each case.
03-01-2013 08:07 AM
If you folks have not done so already, please download our guide for effective searching in DA.
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH88031
This should help you and your legal team create searches that will gather the information you want most of the time. Just be aware of the use of wild cards as too many can cause searches to last much longer than expected before completing.
Also, please go through our recommended optimizations to allow DA to work more efficiently.
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH56172
Carefully read this article before implementing the recommended changes as some are for 32-bit OS and are noted as such. Some folks seem to overlook the statements about those change only being for 32-bit OS.