04-28-2017 02:01 AM
Hello,
My exchange admin asked me what was exactly ( step by step) the processes used by EV to archive Exchange Mailboxesduring an archive run ( determine what has to be archived, archive it and declare a mailbox as archived). As they are looking at the last logged user on mailboxes and even after a run they didn't especially see the Vault Account, they now don't believe in a mapi login anymore.
Could any body get me this info or refer me to a doc explaining this process.
We are using EV 11.0.1 CH5 and exchange 2010 SP3
Thank you
Sandrine
04-28-2017 07:03 AM - edited 04-29-2017 02:09 AM
Hi Sandrine,
Here it's a high level of the process.
Note the mailboxes are scanned under the context of the EV service account which has read permissions in Exchange.
For more info, have a look through the following articles:
http://www.veritas.com/docs/000039674
http://www.veritas.com/docs/000068605
Hope this helps.
05-02-2017 12:14 AM
Thank you Virgil for your answer.
My problem is/was that I also "thought" everything was done via those mapi connections but my exchange admin ( who is also my boss) tells me that when he checked last mapi connection on the mailboxes he doesn't always see the EV account which he should as we do a run everynights. So we were wondering if it really when trough all the mailboxes via MAPI just to check if something was to be archived or not.
I will give him your answer.
05-02-2017 02:04 AM
Hello Sandrine,
what account does he see? Could it be the Enterprise Vault system Mailbox account defined on the task perhaps? Or is it perhaps an account from backup tooling? Remember that the services run under the VSA, but the task most likely uses a different account. It is the task which connects to the mailboxes as far as I am aware...
You might want to open a call at support, to have an exact process diagram of mailbox archiving.
05-02-2017 02:18 AM
hello Gertjan,
He sees divers users at divers times stamps. So basically not really something usefull.I'll contact the support for the diagram . Thank you for your answer
Sandrine