03-17-2010 12:54 PM
We will be supporting an environment with over 55K users. Before considering implementing Virtual Vault...I'd like to clarify what are the benefits of Virtual Vault besides the ones listed below? I found a knowledge base article indicating high latency in large environments. Best Practice documentation indicates 3 alternatives that can potentially impact SQL servers, the network, EV servers, or dataloss due to the lack of safety copies etc.
I'm afraid that the combination of any of those alternatives with the high amount of users will definitely impact the performance of the application with the end user. I'd like to understand the benefits of Virtual Vault to see if it outweighs the above.
It is my understanding that Virtual Vault can...
a) Appears as a regular Outlook PST files to the end user.
b) Items can be drag and dropped for archiving purposes as regular PST usage.
c) Multiple items may be select for mass email archive deletion.
d) Specific Retention periods and archiving strategies may be asssigned to a users Virtual Vault for classification purposes. Allowing users to archive only relevant items from the regular outlook mailbox, and at the same time freeing up space due to Exchange mailbox quotas.
Please advise on your comments,
Thanks,
Dennis
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-17-2010 01:10 PM
03-17-2010 01:10 PM
03-18-2010 07:08 AM
http://support.veritas.com/docs/345354
I would wait for this hotfix mentioned above to come out before implementation. With any large environment you should test in a QA environment and roll out a Pilot.
03-18-2010 07:18 AM
03-18-2010 10:56 AM
03-23-2010 07:34 AM
03-25-2010 02:49 AM
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/346892.htm
Virtual Vault Best Practice Guide
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/347092.htm
--Andy
03-25-2010 07:18 AM