cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Logs BPBKAR

Steven05
Level 4

Hello everyone.

The bpbkar logs one of my Windows servers to a size of more than 2G is this normal?
the verbose is 0
I do not understand why.

Thanks for your help.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

revarooo
Level 6
Employee

Bingo ;) Thought it was something to do with include/exclude with all those entries.

View solution in original post

20 REPLIES 20

RiaanBadenhorst
Moderator
Moderator
Partner    VIP    Accredited Certified

Only for 1 day? Did it coincide with any errors for that server?

If its not happening continously then just delete the file and monitor the folder to see if it happens again.

mph999
Level 6
Employee Accredited

Have a look in the log and see what it was doing ...

Normal, well, I don't know your environment, but I would say that seemed a tad on the large side ...

Steven05
Level 4

the server is being backed up and the logs is over 2G
The file system This greatly filled

mph999
Level 6
Employee Accredited

Once the backup is finished, you can delete the log.  However, without looking in it there is no way to comment on why it is happening.

If you delete the dir, it will prevent bpbkar from making any logs.
 

Steven05
Level 4

often this server backup errors (Example 13) I need to analyze logs
  after an upgrade to 7.6.0.1 to 7.6.0.3 I have the error code 24

 

ROOT@admincmd> bptestbpcd -client nameserver -debug -verbose
11:22:41.271 [20765] <2> bptestbpcd: VERBOSE = 0
11:22:41.277 [20765] <2> vnet_pbxConnect: pbxConnectEx Succeeded
11:22:41.278 [20765] <2> logconnections: BPCD CONNECT FROM 10.59389 TO 10..1556 fd = 3
11:22:41.282 [20765] <2> vnet_pbxConnect: pbxConnectEx Succeeded
11:22:41.318 [20765] <8> do_pbx_service: [vnet_connect.c:2152] via PBX VNETD CONNECT FROM 10.250.5.145.41277 TO 10.109.10.13.1556 fd = 4
11:22:41.319 [20765] <8> vnet_vnetd_connect_forward_socket_begin: [vnet_vnetd.c:443] VN_REQUEST_CONNECT_FORWARD_SOCKET 10 0xa
11:22:41.455 [20765] <8> vnet_vnetd_connect_forward_socket_begin: [vnet_vnetd.c:460] ipc_string 3668
11:22:41.495 [20765] <2> put_string: cannot write data to network:  Connection reset by peer (104)
11:22:41.495 [20765] <2> bpcr_put_vnetd_forward_socket: put_string 3668 failed: 104
11:22:41.495 [20765] <2> local_bpcr_connect: bpcr_put_vnetd_forward_socket failed: 24
11:22:41.495 [20765] <2> ConnectToBPCD: bpcd_connect_and_verify(samba, samba) failed: 24
<16>bptestbpcd main: Function ConnectToBPCD(samba) failed: 24
11:22:41.495 [20765] <16> bptestbpcd main: Function ConnectToBPCD(samba) failed: 24
<16>bptestbpcd main: socket write failed
11:22:41.503 [20765] <16> bptestbpcd main: socket write failed
<2>bptestbpcd: socket write failed
11:22:41.503 [20765] <2> bptestbpcd: socket write failed
<2>bptestbpcd: EXIT status = 24
11:22:41.503 [20765] <2> bptestbpcd: EXIT status = 24
socket write failed
 

 

 

 

mph999
Level 6
Employee Accredited

bptestbpcd failing with status 24 is suggestive of a network error, not a NetBackup error.

NetBackup doesn't control the network, it just uses what is available, and if that isn't working properly, it errors.

 

RiaanBadenhorst
Moderator
Moderator
Partner    VIP    Accredited Certified

Are you a NetBackup Appliance? There were instances of 24 related to tcp timestamps setting on appliance

Steven05
Level 4

I'm not on a NetBackup Appliance.
Error 24 occurred after the update

RiaanBadenhorst
Moderator
Moderator
Partner    VIP    Accredited Certified

TCP Chimney has been known to sometimes create intermittent errors. You'll see specific errors such as "2:18:23.023 PM: [1912.2224] <2> TransporterRemote::write[2](): DBG -  | An Exception of type [SocketWriteException] has occured at: |   Module: @(#) $Source: src/ncf/tfi/lib/TransporterRemote.cpp,v $ $Revision: 1.51 $ , Function: TransporterRemote::write[2](), Line: 307 |   Local Address: [::]:0 |   Remote Address: [::]:0 |   OS Error: 10054 (An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host."

In your bpbkar logs.

https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH150369.html

 

Please note, this sometimes works and sometimes doesn't.

Steven05
Level 4

regarding the error 24, I handed my server to its previous version (7.6.0.1) and error 24 is gone.
just be a patch problem to do with the Windows team

I have the same problem of bpbkar logs which swelled considerably.
I still do not understand why?

CRZ
Level 6
Employee Accredited Certified

It would help if you could give us some samples of your client's bpbkar logs to look at.

Double check the client's registry - do you see any weird entries for VERBOSE or BPBKAR_VERBOSE in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Veritas\NetBackup\CurrentVersion\Config ?  (You can also use bpgetconfig if you're a command line guy)

Do policies including this client contain a lot of entries in the exclude and include lists, maybe?

GulzarShaikhAUS
Level 6
Partner Accredited Certified

Can u try to zip one up and see what size it creates .. If its possible to upload one of the log then it will be easy to let you know what is causing the size of log to grow that much.

Also to make sure you can try to open it at your end in a advanced editor like textpad notpad++ and then search for keyword VERBOSE = . This will confirm if the verbosity in the log is indeed 0. 

In my experience I have seen bpbkar that big very often but at higher verbosity.

Steven05
Level 4

Hello,

bpbkar logs after working 3H

Thanks

revarooo
Level 6
Employee

You are getting a lot of messages like:

01:51:31.053: [8092.6600] <2> tar_base::V_vTarMsgW: INF - Excluded: D:\sybase\Dump
01:51:31.053: [8092.6600] <2> tar_base::V_vTarMsgW: INF - Reincluded: D:\sybase\Dump

 

do you have an exclude and include list for this client? If so, post it up.

Steven05
Level 4

 

BACKUP SELECTION LIST

EXCLUDE A AJOUTER AU POLICY SYSTEM

c:\sybase\dump

C:\sybase\device

d:\sybase\dump

D:\sybase\device

e:\sybase\dump

E:\sybase\device

g:\sybase\dump

F:\sybase\device

f:\sybase\dump

G:\sybase\device

d:\oracle\dump

 

d:\client32

 

c:\client

 

d:\client

 

revarooo
Level 6
Employee

Hmm wonder why these excluded entries are being re-included? Try deleting your exclude and includes and re-adding them.

Steven05
Level 4

this problem has just been solved.
The exclusion police had not been specified.

revarooo
Level 6
Employee

Bingo ;) Thought it was something to do with include/exclude with all those entries.

Steven05
Level 4

I just tried to revive the backup and I have the same error code 24