08-06-2008 09:19 AM
(* It supports txt85.eng too, but that's only good for pure ASCII text.)
08-06-2008 10:48 AM
I guess it depends on your definition of "better." If I read my Google results correctly, I think lzrw3 can compress to a smaller size but at a slightly slower pace, whilst lzo1x is speedier but won't result in as small a compressed file.
(Is that right? I eagerly await correction.)
08-31-2009 07:38 PM