08-09-2012 09:06 PM
Hi all,
It seems at some point between Jul2012 and Aug2012, Symantec removed the following technote referenced by Mark:
https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/c-drive-almost-full-dbimages-how-change-veritas-location-c-now#comment-7351971
It was a technote about editing the Windows registry to allow just the images db directory structure (aka the whole image catalog) to be relocated to a different path/drive, in case it gets too big.
This only moves the images db. The rest of Netbackup is left alone in the original path.
The beauty of this solution is that you don't have to use the messy ALTPATH touch file method;
you also don't have to use the OS's symbolic links/hard links method, which is apparently not recommended because it may lead to other potential problems.
We have a site that implemented the solution described in the tech note.
The entire images db directory structure was moved from the default path in C:\ to somewhere in E:\ because the growth of the images db was causing C:\ to run out of space fast.
It worked nicely and we never had any problems with it.
However, we are now planning to upgrade this Master server from version 7.0 to 7.5.
Seeing that this tech note is no longer available/published, does that mean its method is no longer supported in nbu versions past 7.0?
What would happen if we go ahead and upgrade, would we encounter problems because 7.5 isn't expecting the images db to have been relocated away from its default location?
Thanks all,
RLeon
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-09-2012
11:15 PM
- last edited on
01-03-2018
11:11 PM
by
Marianne
You mean this one ....
Solution
08-14-2012 12:38 AM
I think with that small modification there is no problem with support.
You have a copy of the technote - therefore, you are covered.
Martin
08-09-2012
11:15 PM
- last edited on
01-03-2018
11:11 PM
by
Marianne
You mean this one ....
Solution
08-10-2012 12:16 AM
That's the one!
Think you can undelete that technote and add approval for Netbackup 7.5?
If not, then I don't know if it would be safe to upgrade.
Thanks,
RLeon
08-10-2012 12:43 AM
Can't see why there would be an issue at 7.5 to be honest, providing the registry key is still there
BUT ... this should be tested first and not on a live server ...
I'll drop a email to the guy that wrote it - see if he can update it.
Martin
08-10-2012 01:22 AM
Thanks for helping to find out.
I would test it when I get the chance, but it would be better if I have something official to refer back to.
Now, with the only tech note that talks about this technique gone, our current configuration is abruptly invalidated.
It has created uncertain and risky factors for our upgrade plans.
RLeon
08-13-2012 06:46 PM
I tested it and could confirm that this trick still works in version 7.5.0.3.
Now, if only this technote is undeleted, I wouldn't care why it was deleted in the first place.
Imagine if in the future I had to call support to solve some catalog related problems:
Support: OMG you moved the image db to a different drive, what have you done!
Me: It was on a technote that is no longer...
Support: No there is no technote, what have you done! Oh God why! What the...!
Me: Hang on a second...
Support: This is blasphemy! This is madness! *hangs up*
08-14-2012 12:25 AM
ROFL - I read the bit of theatrics before I read
Imagine if in the future I had to call support to solve some catalog related problems
08-14-2012 12:38 AM
I think with that small modification there is no problem with support.
You have a copy of the technote - therefore, you are covered.
Martin
08-14-2012 07:44 AM
Andy,
in the past I've had a few similar exchanges with the supports on other issues. They were no where near as dramatic. Unfortunately.
Martin,
I guess I could always reference this thread if necessary, unless...
*gasp*
08-14-2012 07:52 AM
I just had visions of a Pythonesque type sketch .... highlight of my day, ty.