03-16-2016 03:46 AM
Please help me understand the output.
I ran the command on nbu master server -
C:\Program Files\Veritas\NetBackup\bin\admincmd>bpimagelist -backupid 10.11.20.21_1457793040
I have also attached the output in txt file.
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-16-2016 04:01 AM
What do you want to know ?
I highly recommend the following tech note to understand the different field of bpimagelist
DOCUMENTATION: What are the different fields in "bpimagelist -l" output?
http://www.veritas.com/docs/000032604
Update:
Please note: The use of IP adresses as host name is not supported in Netbackup.
03-16-2016 04:01 AM
What do you want to know ?
I highly recommend the following tech note to understand the different field of bpimagelist
DOCUMENTATION: What are the different fields in "bpimagelist -l" output?
http://www.veritas.com/docs/000032604
Update:
Please note: The use of IP adresses as host name is not supported in Netbackup.
03-16-2016 05:26 AM
Hello,
As mentioned by Nicolai do not use ipaddress and it may be a concern for you later if the restore is not working
I would also recommend you to use bpimagelist with -U or -L option which is more descriptive
03-16-2016 05:36 AM
Hi Nicolai,
Thanks. Really helpful info.
Also the ip address above is of our filer in san env. We never faced any issue with IP.
But what you suggest? what is the impact?
Thanks.
03-16-2016 05:48 AM
The only NBU requirements are forward and reverse name lookup in both directions and port connectivity.
It's recommended to use hostname in NetBackup environment instead of IP address as NBU server/client name.
Use bpclntcmd with the following parameter to see the result of name resolution.
execute commands against nbu server and client, respectively.
bpclntcmd -ip <ip_address>
bpclntcmd -hn <host_name>
execute command against nbu master,
usr/openv/netbackup/bin# ./bpclntcmd -pn
expecting response from server nb_srv
192.x.x.x *NULL* 192.x.x.x 20154
*NULL*, indicates that you have not configured this client in any nbu polies.
The first column "192.x.x.x" in second line indicates that you don't have hostname associated with the IP address
03-16-2016 08:59 AM
It seems the IP as hostname limitation has been lifted in NBU 7.7.2
Not mentioned in the NBU 7.7.2 release notes any more, some limitation in IPv6 still exists.
So you are all good.
03-18-2016 10:33 PM
03-20-2016 04:12 PM
I'm going to disagree a little ...
IP adddress in EMM will cause issues if you every run the NetBackup Catalog Consistancy check (NBCC), I can't remember if it stops it running, or causes it to give incorrect results.
I do however remember that my colleague who was looking at that particular case (who incidently wrote the first version of NBCC) stated the IP address should never be defined in EMM.
03-20-2016 10:57 PM
03-21-2016 01:12 AM
Hi Martin, good to see you in the discussion.
Previous the release notes contained a note not to use IP addresses as host names, this note seems to be removed in 7.7.x.
From "us" outsiders, this does look like Veritas now support IP as hostnames, so I am keen on hearing what Veritas from the "inside" has to say :)
03-21-2016 08:24 AM
I'll see what I can find out ...