05-20-2008 08:17 AM
05-23-2008 07:18 AM
05-29-2008 08:35 AM
05-29-2008 08:41 AM
06-02-2008 05:39 AM
06-11-2008 03:02 AM
06-11-2008 03:52 AM
06-11-2008 04:12 AM
06-12-2008 02:06 AM
06-16-2008 01:44 AM
06-17-2008 02:58 AM
10-11-2008 04:31 PM
It could be that modifications to the backup job will force a new baseline image, which then would be sent to the storage location. Since the files are already there from the previous backups those will not be copied (or shouldn't be) but still the first large *.V2i file is being made and still copied to the remote FTP location taking up a lot of bandwidth.
It is because of this interest is being taken into the possibility of ‘Seeding’ an Offsite copy to say a NAS when locally connected and then continue having incremental updates offsite copied when the NAS is located through a WAN connection so to not use up so much bandwidth. Customers interested in the feature should use the HELP | Send Feedback option expressing this and other enhancements they wish to see with the product. Secondly they can join the Symbeta team https://symbeta.symantec.com to offer suggestions as the product is being developed.
10-13-2008 04:45 AM
ok...
You could also consider to use True Image Echo Server for Windows from Acronis which does the trick.
http://eu.acronis.com/enterprise/products/ATISWin/
10-14-2008 08:07 PM
This is an interesting issue on how to seed a backup and take it offsite and have it continue with incremental updates. Those interested please forward your interest into this so that I can present the material to product managment.
10-15-2008 02:31 AM
I for one would be very interested in this functionality. seems a bit pointless to have off-site without it to be honest.
10-16-2008 01:03 AM
Would be nice with Symantec since pricing is lower than Acronis and easier to order (for us) also functionality with exchange is nice and Acronis do not have that yet.
Idea is to take a full backup and move it to external location and then continue the backup to there, and maybe redo the full backup every month or more.
Does anyone have any reasons why this should not be done ?
Appreciate you time
10-16-2008 10:36 AM
10-27-2008 09:57 PM
This feature is an absolute must. Our Dell rep sold us on a bunch of these licenses for our clients, but now we can't actually use it because the initial backup is far too large. Let's put this in perspective: If you uploaded and average of 1mb of data every second for an entire month it would be a little over 300GB. That would backup 1 average small businesses server, but would completely saturate most small businesses upload bandwidth for an entire month... just to create the initial backup. I cannot believe this feature has been overlooked. There needs to be an option to create an initial backup to a NAS or USB device and then carry it to an offsite location, copy it to another storage device and then have only incremental backups pushed over the wire.
Also, there needs to be an ability to create a full backup set from an original full and X-amount of incrementals. For instance, let's say I have my initial full backup and a months worth of incrementals. I want the ability to take all of that months incrementals and combine them into one master backup, then be able to delete the old incrementals and make new incrementals off of the new master backup. That way I would never have to take the NAS/USB back to the customers site to "re-seed" my master backup.
As it stands, this product is much like having to hack together community supported open-source software, but having to pay to do it.
11-01-2008 01:26 PM
11-03-2008 06:57 PM