About ahlbraro

ahlbraro · 08-07-2015

Over the past few weeks I had seen backup performance on a Windows 2012 R2 box with BackupExec 14.1 Rev 1786 go in the toilet. Backup rates were on the order of 200MB/min to an LTO-4 tape drive. Come to discover that patch KB3045313 was the ...

ahlbraro · 02-09-2015

Hello, I am in the process of moving off of BackupExec 2010R3 on Windows 2003 to BackupExec 2014 SP2 on Windows 2012 R2. On the old system, I would backup CIFs data on a NetApp filer and get a throughput of about 970MB/min. (Please don't question ...

ahlbraro · 02-19-2015

That arrogance from Symantec is why I'm looking to different vendors. When performance on a brand new server with substantially faster processing power performs at half the speed of a server I bought in 2003, it's not the new hardware that's the pro...

ahlbraro · 02-18-2015

The aggravation really comes from the fact that older versions of backup exec performed adequately. I shelled out money for the new version and it's unusable.

ahlbraro · 02-18-2015

Well the support call was wothless. Seriously going to look to other vendors.

ahlbraro · 02-13-2015

Performance still in the toilet for the regularly nightly scheduled job. I've opened a support case because this is unacceptable.

ahlbraro · 02-11-2015

Sorry for the delay in updating this. 1. Yes, fully patched. 2. Tonight I'm trying to use a re-created job. My first tests since the first slow backup have been ok speedwise. The past couple days i've been experimenting with NDMP backups but I ...

VOX

User Statistics

User Activity

Windows KB3045313 slows things down badly

Slow backup of CIFS data via UNC

That arrogance from Symantec

The aggravation really comes

Well the support call was

Performance still in the

Sorry for the delay in