Quantum Superloader 3 w/ LTO7 HH and BackupExec 20.6
Just installed a Quantum Superloader 3 with an LTO7 HH drive connected to a Windows 2016 server via SAS. I am running fully patched BUEX 20.6. BUEX has been installed and running jobs to networked storage for a few years. I am able to see the library and drive in BUEX. I can inventory and scan the slots of the unit. There is currently 2 blank and 1 cleaning tapes loaded in the unit (slots 3 4 and 2). When I run a job I am getting a message to "Please instert overwritable media into the robotic library using the import command". Any help would be appriciated.Solved448Views0likes4CommentsDuplicate/copy backup images from tape to tape
Hi, I have gotten a request to duplicate/copy 2 tapes to new tapes. On each tape there's 1 backup set. The backup environment has 2 tape drives attached. I just need a 1-1 copy of tape in order to have an extra copy. If I right click the backup set I can choose "duplicate" and the process seems pretty straight forward. As destination I can see the library and also partitions and also the tape drives. If I pick the tape storage pool will the duplication job just take an available scratch tape if I pick the scratch media media set or? Any input would be much appreciated. Thanks.613Views0likes2CommentsFehler beim Überprüfen der Identifikationsdaten MSSQL
Guten Tag, wir haben auf einem Server "Backup Exec 20.4" und auf einem weiterem Server den "Backup Exec Agent for Applications and Databases" Wenn ich nun in Backup Exec die Identifikationsdaten testen lasse, dann werden auf dem Server alle Laufwerke, Systemstatus und EFI-Systempartition als "Erfolgreich" getestet angezeigt. Nur der MSSQL-Server schließt mit einem Fehler ab. Auch bei einem Versuch bei einem Backup die Datenbanken aufzulisten, bekomme ich eine Fehlermeldung, dass das Login-Konto fehlerhaft ist. Ein Test des Loginkontos zeigt allerdings "Erfolgreich" an. Kann mir bitte jemand erklären, was da schief läuft. Hier die dazugehörigen Screenshots Danke.888Views0likes3CommentsBackup Exec 20, taking longer to backup randomly.
Backing up 1.5 TB of files to a tape drive. Backup takes 5 hours, including verification. It works just fine for days but on other days (random, not the same physical tapes or days of week) it times out after 10 hours. Changed the job's maximum configured run time to 15 hours from 10 to remedy this. What could be causing this difference? Is it change or altered state of files being backed up? And if so, how do I fix this? I would appreciate all the help I can get on this.852Views0likes4CommentsAutoloader goes offline by drive calibration (Quantum V700, LTO-9)
We changed a LTO-6-Library against a new LTO-9 Autoloder. A new tape is shown as "unknown media" and the capacity "0 Bytes used" with a green bar that the full tape can be used. New for us is the experience that each new tape we loaded into the 16-slot-magazine will need a calibration when the tape is "inventoried" the first time. When we start the inventory, the tape will be moved to the picker and the loader shows "calibrating" in the display and in the Onboard-Management console. After ca. 2 minutes the loader goes offline and Backup Exec shows both drive and loader offline. We did make them online again, but the calibration goes further on. After some hour, the drive will load the tape and then we can move the tape by move-command in the management of the loader (we did not try the onboard-management) to the slot, where it comes from. After this we make a "read slot" and the tape will be shown in the slot. Then we start inventory for this slot again, and the tape will go over the picker to the drive, loaded and unloaded and then the tape return to the slot automatically. The tape is shown in Backup Exec as "empty Medium" and the capacity is shown as "0 Bytes used of 16,4 TB". Now we can use the tape for backup-jobs. No error and no offline will occur. But whenever we start an inventory for a brand new tape, the drive and the loader goes offline. We think, this is a time-out-error, because the inventory in the drive continues without error. But the time, how long backup-Exec is waiting for an answer for calibarting is to short, so it make drive and library offline. Is this correct? Can we adjust manually the parameter for the time-out (Registry?)? Is there another reason, why the machine goes offline? In the "bengine_AlwaysOnLog_2022-09-22_10-49-31.log" we can find: [2556] 2022-09-21T18:40:59.990 [tpfmt] - TF_GetTargetMediaDeviceInfo(): Execute(ADAMM_MOVER_EXECUTE_GET_SERVER_INFO) failed. mvrRet=87. In the beginning, we did only disable the tape0 (LTO-6), but at the end the device was switched off, removed from SAS-Connector and deleted from Backup Exec. The error consists. By the way, all drivers are current. The library and the drive are shown correct in device manager. JuZe3.3KViews0likes9CommentsNewb's question first time restoring in Backup Exec 20.4
When I select the backup set that I want to restore and then hover my mouse over the 'Restore' function, it reads 'Browse the backup set and then restore the data.'. If I then click on 'Restore', is there a subsequent window where I get to select the specific folder(s) I want to restore or does it automatically restore the entire backup set? I'm hoping it's the former as I don't want to overwrite all my current data. Thanks.514Views0likes1CommentV-79-57344-65033 - Directory not found. Cannot backup directory
Backup Exec 20.4 running on the host and multiple VM servers all running Windows Server 2019. Some of the servers are running the agent and backing up separately, some are just backing up as VMs under the host therefore it is not possible to make specific file selections to add/skip. I am regularly getting V-79-57344-65033 - Directory not found. Cannot backup directory for a list of directories. It seems to happen on one server a day, different servers each time, with no discernible pattern. I have tried removing a server from the backup, saving then re-adding and saving again which seems to stop it happening for a while on that specific server, but it pops up sooner or later. I cannot get a clean set of full backups for all the servers. We run multiple sites with multiple server setups using backup exec, every server will have files in the Windows directories being created and removed for updates/temporary files etc but this is the only site where this is a problem. Please can anyone advise on what I might be able to do to fix the issue?882Views0likes2CommentsCustom NDMP Port - Backup Exec 20.4
This is for Backup Exec 20.4 running on Windows 2019 Server. We need to backup a couple Linux clients at a site where port 10000 is already in use by some proprietary software. We had no issues changing it on the Linux host in /etc/services - the service started up fine and we can confirm connectivity with both Telnet from another Unix host and with 'Test-NetConnection' in Powershell on the Backup Exec server. Both show the port is opening and receiving requests, but I can't seem to get Backup Exec to discover the server. There is no Firewall between these two hosts, plus the TCP connections on that port work fine. We picked port 55555 just at random as it's not used and won't likely be used. From what I found so far, this is the 'control port' to establish the initial connection. Is there a setting that needs changed in Backup Exec to allow for the initial control connection over a custom port?719Views0likes0CommentsBackup Exec 20.6 Hyper-V VM backups jobs are slow and display wrong byte count after VHDX expansion
Hello all After expanding a VHDX of a Hyper-V 2016 VM, daily differential backups which usually had a size of around 50GB are taking longer and job's byte count is around the same size of VHDX expansion (500GB). I'm using Hyper-V 2016 Resilient Change Tracking for backups. After the job finishes Backup Sets have regular size (around 50GB) Other interesting thing is that just after a full backup, differential or incremental backups run with correct byte count. I don't know why, after about 1 week job's byte count get back to around the same 500GB... Any help is appreciated!644Views0likes0Comments