backup Performence
how to improve backup performance(For example I am running a backup operation it is taking 10 hours (consider ) then I need it to finish it within 5 hours or below mean as early as possible is it possible or not if possible means how Give me an example )Solved1.9KViews2likes8CommentsProblem backup Exchange / problema com backup Exchange.
I am having a problem with netbackup in exchange backup. I have one policy, with 20 bases, balanced on two servers, 18 bases always work and 2 return with error status 13. occasionally it works all. I found that after the error, the service 'Microsoft Exchange Writer Replica' hangs waiting for Completing netbackup 7.6 (5220 appliance - linux) exchange 2010 windows 2008 r2 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Info nbjm (pid = 12818) starting backup job (jobid = 551671) for client dagsp, policy-DAG__dagsp__SP Exchange - TIMELY, schedule Full-Diario 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Info nbjm (pid = 12818) Requesting MEDIA_SERVER_ONLY resources from RB for backup job (jobid = 551671, request id: {} ED78EFF4-5E01-11E5-8082-566DC13E44FD) 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Requesting resource stu_disk_asap119pbkp 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Requesting resource asap120pbkp.NBU_CLIENT.MAXJOBS.dagsp 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Requesting resource asap120pbkp.NBU_POLICY.MAXJOBS.Exchange-DAG__dagsp__SP - SPOT 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Requesting resource EXCHANGE_RESOLVER.asap120pbkp.Exchange-DAG__dagsp__SP - PONTUAL.dagsp 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Granted resource asap120pbkp.NBU_CLIENT.MAXJOBS.dagsp 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Granted resource asap120pbkp.NBU_POLICY.MAXJOBS.Exchange-DAG__dagsp__SP - SPOT 09.18.2015 09:36:47 - Granted resource EXCHANGE_RESOLVER.asap120pbkp.Exchange-DAG__dagsp__SP - PONTUAL.dagsp 09.18.2015 09:36:49 - estimated 338 198 365 kbytes needed 09.18.2015 09:36:49 - begin Parent Job 09.18.2015 09:36:50 - Info RUNCMD (pid = 2613) started 09.18.2015 09:36:50 - Info RUNCMD (pid = 2613) exiting with status: 0 Operation Status: 0 9/18/2015 9:36:50 - end Parent Job; elapsed time 0:00:01 Operation Status: 0 Operation Status: 0 09.18.2015 09:36:52 - started bpbrm process (pid = 2620) 09.18.2015 09:36:53 - Info bpbrm (pid = 2620) dagsp is the host to restore to 09.18.2015 09:36:53 - Info bpbrm (pid = 2620) File reading list for client 09.18.2015 09:36:55 - Info bpbrm (pid = 2620) client_pid = 29768 09.18.2015 09:36:56 - Info bpbrm (pid = 2620) from client dagsp: TRV - BPRESOLVER has executed on server (NSAP002PMBX) 09.18.2015 09:37:20 - Info bpbrm (pid = 2620) from client dagsp: TRV - Last backup attempt of database 'Microsoft Information Store: \ MBXSPVIPDB05-1' on server NSAP001PMBX failed. Will try to find another server in preferred server list. 09.18.2015 09:37:22 - Info bpresolver (pid = 29768) done. status: 0 09.18.2015 09:37:22 - Info bpresolver (pid = 29768) done. status: 0: the requested operation was successfully completed Operation Status: 0 Operation Status: 0 Operation Status: 15 Operation Status: 0 09.18.2015 13:05:35 - Info RUNCMD (pid = 6293) started 09.18.2015 13:05:35 - Info RUNCMD (pid = 6293) exiting with status: 0 Operation Status: 0 Operation Status: 15 file close failed (15)Solved1.8KViews0likes6CommentsE-Vault coverage Q&A
Good day, I am looking for input on how to provide coverage to an Enterprise Vault 10 (with historical data from as far back as v6) via NetBackup 7.5.0.4 I have reviewed article TECH176623 and found it easy to implement steps 1 & 2 (Full schedules only; SQL data is on separate/SQL servers which handle their own t-logs and truncations). Step 3 I am finding to be 'iffy'; we have over 1.5TB of Index data, most of which is from older versions of EV and it appears that these jobs (Fulls) will not complete in a timely enough manner. Step 4 I think is pretty much a long shot currently due to being multiple TB in size. Thoughts/Concerns: The article above strongly suggests not overlapping the runs of any of the jobs; exactly how critical is this? If a step 3 (or 4) job is still running, what would be the impact of having a step 1 or 2 job run at the same time? If the Index and Closed Partition data is just flat-file in nature, could I not just back them up via a standard MS-Windows policy? Unless overlapping 1&2 jobs doesn't matter? If overlapping jobs is a critical issue, how do people engineer their schedules exactly? I'm fine with running a full infrequently, but how do people typically prevent the other steps from running while the full is in progress? Environmental info: EV: version 10 on Windows 2008 R2 (SQL on an alternate/dedicated server) NBU: version 7.5.0.4 on an AIX6 master and WIndows 2008 R2 media servers1.3KViews0likes5CommentsTracking off-site vendor media ids in NBU
Greetings. NBU 7.0.1, with a NetApp VTL, duplicating to LTO4 tapes for offsiting. Our offsite vendor uses their own media id and sticker for their tracking/storing purposes. Is there a way to track this in NBU? Some EMM field somewhere, perhaps? :-) What I basically need is a secondary media id so that I can store both our media id (our barcoded id, which is something like STKXXX) and their media id (TAPE-XXXX-XXX-XXXXXXX, where only the last 7 digits change). So far we've been tracking it in an external database so that we can correlate our NBU media id to our offsite vendor's media id, but it'd be nice to ditch the external component. I looked at the Slot information in vaulting, but that really tracks what amounts to a physical location at the vendor, and it re-utilizes what it assumes are empty slots once it has returned media. So that won't work (unless that behavior can be modified?). Any creative ideas? Very best case I get a solution where, when our vaulting policy runs, I can generate a list that shows our media id and barcode alone with our offsite vendor's media id. -BrettSolved1.2KViews0likes8CommentsNetBackup 7.5.0.5 and Enterprise Vault 9.0.4 Exchange 2010 - Backup Indexes failed
Hello We haveNetBackup 7.5.0.5 server on Linux RH (on master and one media server) andEnterprise Vault 9.0.4 for Exchange 2010 in MCS Windows 2008 R2 cluster. Backup of SEV indexes failed with error - 2. All other SEV backups (partitions, FP DB - passed normally). During backup error appeared in SEV application log 7264 - Abnormal error occurred Error: Exception occurred. (0x80020009) Reference: CCache::SetIndexLocationBackupMode Index: Info: EM/e We've cleared backup mode from all indexes and rerun job - but job still fail. BPresolver log from SEV server in attach. Please help. Best Regards, StanislavSolved1.2KViews0likes14CommentsSnapshot error (156) In the Index backup of Enterprise Vault environment
Hi, all. I need help to solve a problem with a backup of Enterprise Vault Index NBU Server and clients are 7.5.0.5 version (Windows Server 2008) Enterprise Vault is 10.0.3 version(Windows Server 2008) The EV environmentconsists of the following servers: server1 and server2 = mailarch1 (virtualname) - server3 and server4 = mailrarch2 (virtualname) server5 and server6 = fileserverarch (virtualname) server7 and server8 = sharepointarch (virtualname) server9 and server10 = journalarch (virtualname) Clustered by MSCS Disks managed by SFW Above is a policy configuration ------------------------------------------------------------ Policy Name: Teste_EV_Arch1_Index Policy Type: Enterprise-Vault Active: yes Effective date: 05/27/2013 12:36:50 Mult. Data Streams: yes Client Encrypt: no Checkpoint: no Policy Priority: 0 Max Jobs/Policy: Unlimited Disaster Recovery: 0 Collect BMR info: no Residence: nbuserver01-hcart-robot-acs-0 Volume Pool: NetBackup Server Group: *ANY* Keyword: (none specified) Data Classification: - Residence is Storage Lifecycle Policy: no Application Discovery: no Discovery Lifetime: 28800 seconds ASC Application and attributes: (none defined) Granular Restore Info: no Ignore Client Direct: no Enable Metadata Indexing: no Index server name: NULL Use Accelerator: no HW/OS/Client: Windows-x64 Windows2008 mailarch1.hom.local Include: EV_INDEX_LOCATION=EVSITE Schedule: full Type: Automatic Backup Frequency: every 7 days Maximum MPX: 1 Synthetic: 0 Checksum Change Detection: 0 PFI Recovery: 0 Retention Level: 1 (2 weeks) Number Copies: 1 Fail on Error: 0 Residence: (specific storage unit not required) Volume Pool: (same as policy volume pool) Server Group: (same as specified for policy) Residence is Storage Lifecycle Policy: 0 Schedule indexing: 0 Daily Windows: ------------------------------------------------------------ The error occurs only in the Snapshot of "mailarch1", theother servers snapshot has completed successfully. PS.: The "OPEN PARTITIONS" are backuped successfully for all servers (with snapshot too) Thanks for yours assistence.Solved1.1KViews0likes2Comments