PUT MORE IN THE GUI!!!!!
I get more frustrated everyday! When I call Symantec support and ask for a simple solution....I am always told to "run this cmd". Netbackup is suppossed to be the industry leader in backup software....so I am told. My company has spent over $500K on the netbackup software.....I can just imagine how much other compaines have spent. Here is 1 small example..... We are planning on moving our datacenter around and need to move alot of servers from this rack to that rack. Some of the servers include the netbackup servers(master & medias). Due to synthetic backups and MSDP(kudos for that)...all backups are done but the duplications to tape are still running. I have 10 duplications pending to run and they will not finish by the time we need to bring down the servers. WHY can I not just right click and hold or suspend these duplications? I am sure it would not take to much to program that into the the gui. NO I have to run some cmd that takes me 30 minutes to gather all of the information I need. Then another 30 minutes to write the cmd to release the duplications. I am sure I could come up with atleast 5 examples of where GUI improvements would make everyone's life's better. I understand that in 7.6 there are suppossed to be ALOT of improvements in SLP's and what can be done. I have been asking for these "improvements" for 3yrs now. Like I said...my company has spent ALOT of money to purchase....and for support for this product. You would think it would not take too much to program in these improvements. Maybe if more of us let Symantec know how we feel....they might do something!620Views3likes2CommentsSuggestions required on catalog size and moving master to a virtual machine
Hi all, I have two master servers in my current environment. Details are as below: Master 1: NBU 7.1.0.4 (physical) Types of backup: Combination of UNIX, Windows OS backups (with BMR enabled for physical machines), Agent based backups for SQL, Lotus Domino and Oracle. Average number of jobs that run on daily basis: 7500 (within a 14 hour backup window) No. of media servers: 15 (physical) No. of clients: Appr. 2200 Current catalog size: 1.1 TB Master 2: NBU 7.5.0.6 (physical) Types of backup: Combination of UNIX, Windows OS backups (with BMR enabled for physical machines), Agent based backups for SQL, Lotus Domino and Oracle. Average number of jobs that run on daily basis: 5000 (within a 14 hour backup window) No: of media servers: 8 (physical) No. of clients: Appr. 800 Current catalog size: 520 GB Both the masters are clustered using Veritas Global custering Option(active-passive mode). Catalog resides in a LUN which is replicated to the DR master LUN using SRDF. With more requirements coming in we are planning to introduce another master with NetBackup 7.6.0.2 on a VM. Media servers will be physical as we use tapes only. My questions are: 1) How big environment can I support with master on VM? 2) How much catalog might be a maximum recommended size on a master hosted ona VM? 3) Our observation from our current 2 masters- Even though Master 2 has less than half the number of clients as Master 1, the catalog size has already reached 520 GB and is still growing (the type of clients is similar). Is this because of the difference in version of NetBackup? Do recent versions add more to the catalog? If yes, then should I expect a bigger catalog on 7.6.0.2? Regards, NeetuSolved1.1KViews2likes2CommentsNetbackup 5020 and 5030 appliances
I am simply looking for some information regarding these PDDO appliances. Are they being phased out as a result of the increased capacity of their MSDP counterparts (5220/5230)? I was in contact with one of our reps and they mentioned the 5030 was becoming obsolete because the 5230 was doubling in capacity. However, there is a major difference between obsolete and no longer to be developed and produced. While MSDP is cool, I feel that it still limits me in the area of concurrent operations and overall disk performance and for this reason, the 5030 still has a place in the data center. If Symantec plans to abandon the 5000 PDDO series in favor of the 5200 MSDP series, then they will need to increase performance to go with the capacity they are touting. We are currently at this cross-roads and are trying to determine our direction and it would seem the best decision is to use a 5030 with my own media server as opposed to locking myself into a MSDP solution with limited perfmance when comparing the two.Solved1.4KViews2likes3CommentsPlanning Migration from NetBackup 7.1.0.3 to 7.5.0.6
Hi everybody, We are planning a migration from NetBackup 7.1.0.3 to 7.5.0.6 in VCS Cluster 5.1 SP2 environment. After the research in compatibility guide, we found that it is supported. Does somebody have an idea about the End Of Life Support ? NetBackup 7.1.0.3 Veritas Cluster Service 5.1 SP2 Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise Thanks in Advance599Views2likes3CommentsSet up and configure backup environment
I have to set up and configure a new backup environment. Customer is asking for 7.5.0.4 but as there are some NBSL memory leakage issue and there are some vm machines to be backed up, shall I go for 7.5.0.4 or 7.1.0.4 as I found this more stable. Also can you please provide all the necessary steps to configure the NetBackup enviroment from scratch starting from design to implementation. There are around 80 Windows machines, some are running some high end applications and databases and 100 vm machines and also some Linux machines around 50 which need FT backup. There are 4 exchange servers 2010 to be backed up and also some SQL and Oracle DB servers. Total there will be around 8TB data to be backed up and may increase another 2TB in future. What will be master server configuration I need to design of how many CPUs and how much RAM and what kind of Network (Ethernet card and FC card) settings should I design and suggest ? Also how many and what type of drives(LTO-4 or LTO-5) should I require ? How I can calculate these things ? Please suggest and advice.Solved1.2KViews2likes5CommentsNetbackup 7.5 Virtual Media Server Performance
Hey Gang!! I'm looking for some real world information regarding the performance of a virtual media server (Win 2008) in NBU 7.5 writing to a CIFS/NFS share. To all of you who have deployed this solution, I would appreciate your sharing the experience and findings... Thanks in advance Jeff265Views2likes0CommentsListing for all Late Breaking News Bullitan which contains most common issues and solutions.
Starting with NetBackup 6.5.2, the Late Breaking News Bulletin has been created in order to provide customers updates on Documentation and Known Issues discovered post release. These documents attempt to highlight the most 'common' known issues and concerns reported by customers. The available Late Breaking News items are below: http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH74904 It is always best practices to look at the news bulletin and release notes before and after an upgrade. Also be sure to subscribe to the document as it is constantly being updated.244Views2likes0CommentsNetbackup client for RHEL on IBM Power PC.
Hi All, Customer has a critical application configured on IBM P Series Platform. Support matrix does not support this platform i.e. Linux on IBM Power PC. None of the NetBackup version even to the latest one are getting installed giving error incorrect platform. uname -a Linux Hostname 3.10.0-229.ael7b.ppc64le #1 SMP Fri Jan 30 12:03:50 EST 2015 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.1 (Maipo) Not sure why IBM and Symantec have not worked together to support P series Platform. Is there any roadmap or future for this support. Is there any workaround to install the client on this platform. Found few technotes but not sure it will help. https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH184987.html https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH176428.html Support matrix. http://origin-symwisedownload.symantec.com/resources/sites/SYMWISE/content/live/SOLUTIONS/230000/TECH230331/en_US/nbu_77_scl.html#operating_systems-red_hat_enterprise_linux TIA.Solved2.2KViews1like2CommentsNetbackup 7.x per TB licensing
Dealing with a customer issue on the high backup volumes. The customer owns License for only 30 TB. The current volume of backup has exceeded the licensing limit. The point of clarification I require to have is on the licensing part. When we say 30 TB of License, it is measured and/ or consumed by the backup volume taken by the NetBackup from the client? (I presume Yes) Will this limit of licensing be measured and/ or consumed for archiving data to tape also? (I presume Yes) What are the consequences faced, if the amount of backup volume exceeds above 30 TB without procuring extra per TB license? What are the possible ways of reduction of backup volumes, considering there are both de-dup and non-de-dup data volumes being backed up?Solved1.4KViews1like5Comments