Backup exec job engine failed to start
BackupExecJobEngine service hangs at 'Starting'. Earlier the problem started when the job was stucking at 'Active: Running' completes some 10 GB to the drive and hangs there. Then i restarted the services where this resulted in BackupExecJobEngine service hangs at 'Stopping'. After this only now the service hangs at Starting. Is this related Backup exec or the tape drive(currently using HP Ultrium 1760). Can someone help me to resolve this issue?5.6KViews0likes7CommentsDuplicate Job always fails with E000E054.
Hello, have Backup Exec 15 (14.2 1180.3142) running on a Windows Server 2012R2 to Backup some HyperV Machines. Those Backups running fine! But when i add a Copy Job to the existing Backup Job it fails always. This is the Error i get: e000e054 - Der Auftrag wurde übersprungen, weil der Backup-Quellauftrag nicht vorhanden ist. Those are the Copy Job Settings: And this is the Error i always get: Thanks for Help on this! BTW: The Product Drop Down field for used OS on the Forum Post Page is damaged... best regards Danny4.3KViews0likes1CommentBacking up Synology NAS is very slow !
Hello, I'm Backing up datas (to an HP LTO-7 Unit, Backup Exec 2016 VRay edition) for a customer. - Windows Server 2012, Hyper-V (3Vm's) : It works fine and fast ! - Synology NAS RS3617RPxs (2 NAS with HighAvailability Cluster) : It works, but it is very very slow ! Data discovering at startup takes a long long time ... And Backing up (2 To,, more ore less) takes a long long time too ! I decided to do a FULL Backup each friday (Week-end to backup, no problem), and to do a differential backup monday to thursday. But it seems that Backup Exec always do a Full Backup ... Why do i want to back up these NAs to an LTO tape ? because of cryptolockers and ransomwares ... It saved my life a few times !!! Any help or advices ? Best regards, Oliver3.2KViews0likes4CommentsDeduplication stream size vs disk cluster size
In a few older applications that rely on file system-based databases, like old Usenet news spool servers for instance, it was a good idea to match the storage volume's cluster size to the smallest file size if possible. For that old Usenet server, 1 KB clusters were good for those less-than 1 KB posts. This made the best use of the space, though it made the file system hellacious to manage when things went wrong. Now fast-forward to today. I have a new 20 TB volume to put a dedupe store on, and NTFS on Server 2008 R2 has a minimum cluster size of 8 KB for a volume that size. I can make the clusters larger though. Is there any benefit to matching the dedupe store volume's cluster size to the data stream size to maximize data deduplication and minimize storage waste? For instance, choose a cluster size of 32 KB and data stream size of 32 KB? (By the way, there's no OS selection for Server 2008 or 2008 R2. It says "2008) not applicable." --Solved2.6KViews0likes3CommentsTerminated Backup Set Corrupted Backup Exec 2014
Hello, We have to restore some files from a back-up tape (2014) and after an Inventory and Catalog it shows that there must be 1.17TB on the tape. If I want to restore the files "Backup Sets" only shows a data size of 65GB and if i double click it doesn’t show any files to restore. The only thing i see is Terminated Backup Set Corrupted (see attachment). Is the tape totally corrupt or is there another way to restore the files from this tape?2.3KViews0likes13CommentsFalse tape drive licensing error messages every hour
I have an issue that just came up on a Backup Exec 15 Central Administration Server on Windows Server 2012r2. I added Dedup storage to our existing iSCSI storage, and suddenly started getting messages about being beyond the licensing for robotic tape libraries and needing to disable 4 tape drives. (V-275-441 error message) Yet, there are no tape drives or libraries hooked to this machine at all. We do have a tape library, on a separate managed machine, at a separate site, with 2 tape drives hooked up my SAS, and both drives are licensed and working properly. I can see that it might see those 2 as a violation of the licensing on the other machine, if they want to be that picky with licensing, but we haven't had issues with it before. It only started with the addition of dedup storage on the CAS machine. Has anyone here seen this before? Is there a way to fix this and get the errors to stop? (It is really a PITA to document this error, the reasons why it is happening, and that I cleared the error without a real fix, every single hour it comes up.)2.1KViews0likes4CommentsSQL Backup Failing
My Backup fails everyday with this issue Backup- \MSSQLSERVERV-79-57344-863 - The SQL Server backup interface has reported a problem. Further details can be found in the job log. Restarting the SQL Server service or the server may correct the problem. V-79-57344-863 - The SQL Server backup interface has reported a problem. Further details can be found in the job log. Restarting the SQL Server service or the server may correct the problem. Backup - Snapshot Technology: Initialization failure on: "System?State". Snapshot technology used: Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). V-79-10000-11233 - VSS Snapshot error. A Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) snapshot is already running on the target computer. Only one snapshot can run at a time. Try running the job later. No other backups are running nothing is using the VSS writers. I check wiht vssadmin list writers they are fine and I'll reboot the server run backup still have this issue. Any ideas?1.9KViews0likes4CommentsBE15 Virtualisation for VMWARE
Hi, i have a customer enquries on BE15 for virtualisation. Customer mentioned that with competitor product "V" they can do a instant restoration of the entireVMs over to the secondary site during restoration process. Can BE15 supports this features? thanks1.8KViews0likes4CommentsIs there anyone stuck on 2010 R3 who cannot upgrade to BE16?
Hi Alll, I am a Veritas Engineer with the Backup Exec product and this post is not a technical problem or solution. Instead, we are looking for customers who are on 2010 and cannot upgrade to the latest version. Maybe because you are on 2003 where upgrades are not supported to the latest version, or you need to move to newer hardware and cannot for because its manual, etc. If this is you, please contact me directly via the private message option and I will reach out to you with some questions. Thanks in advance! Nick1.6KViews0likes6Comments