Deleting Backup_ID Cartridge space not reclaimed.
Team, I have a quick question, i have one cartridge in a POOL XYZ, the cartridge is now full. I have monthly, weekly & daily backups. i have deleted the older backups via bpexpdate -backupid ABC01_A_Backup_1344457991 -d 0 bpexpdate -backupid ABC01_A_Backup_1344457990 -d 0 and many more. but i can see the cartridge is still showing me the FULL status and is not able to entertain after deleting the backup id's. Please let me know, how will this deleted space will be reclaimed?Solved559Views7likes1CommentBackup Exec 2012 Has Issues
To help someone who may be thinking about upgrading to Backup Exec 2012, be careful. Backup Exec 2012, while it does have a very nice user interface and much better view of the backup jobs, it has some major issues that are not yet resolved. We did an upgrade over a week ago and we still can not compete our backups. The issues today are: -- The upgrade got us into a look over the "deduplication" feature and needed to call support for a answer (we have placed the solution on the forum) -- The reports are not working at all. It appears it is using the old reports or is just broken. So no reports on media, or jobs, etc. -- We have run out of backup space and there is NO way to manage the "media". You can see media sets but you are unable to sort or figure out which ones you can delete. (other thanjust reading though theunordered list) NOTE: We can not run a report to view the media which was suggested as a work around. -- There is no way to change the "retention" date of a "media set". So we wanted to reduce the retention period for existing backups so the space on the backup to disk folder will be reclaimed. Well since there is no concept of a "media set" in this version, you can only change the date for future backups. -- It keeps doing "discovery" on computers we have already noted as not needed to be backed up. Discovery runs on its own and adds machines that it finds. Even if we delete the machine, the next time discovery runs we are deleting it again from the list. We need to run discovery but once we make a decision on the machine, it should stop showing up. We are committed to Backup Exec 2012 but are really in a bad way with the product right now. So if you thinking of an upgrade, it might be better to delete you old version and start from scratch. Or wait. Hopefully this will prevent another user from going through this nighmare.1.5KViews6likes10CommentsSystem Recovery Management Solution 2013
I was just on the MySupport portal to create a new case for SSR2011ms and I noticed System Recovery Management Solution 2013 As on option for product version Is there a new version out? I didn’t here anything about a new version or will it be out soon?603Views6likes3CommentsBackup an Exchange 2013 DAG without CNO/CAAP
Hi All, This is my very first post and I really do hope you can help since we have been at it already for 12 hours. Is there any way to backup an IP-less DAG? We have a new Windows server 2012 R2 Exchange 2013 cluster without CAAP/CNO and BE2014 SP2 but no joy. Any help would be appreciated. Tnx. T1.2KViews4likes4CommentsTo force backups via respective dedicated V-LAN.
Hello, We have 1 master and 4 media server(including master which is also acting as media server). xlcnpde089- master/media xlcnpde090- media xlcnpde091- media xlcnpde092- media There are 3 interfaces on each of these severs. One is production NIC and two are dedicated backup NIC(-bak& -baka). Master and media servers xlcnpde089.mags.com/10.207.80.10 Prod NIC (production interface) xlcnpde090.mags.com/10.207.80.11 xlcnpde091.mags.com/10.207.80.12 xlcnpde092.mags.com/10.207.80.13 xlcnpde089-bak.mags.com/10.207.242.98 bakNIC (backup interface) xlcnpde090-bak.mags.com/10.207.242.100 xlcnpde091-bak.mags.com/10.207.242.102 xlcnpde092-bak.mags.com/10.207.242.104 xlcnpde089-baka.mags.com/10.247.176.131 bakaNIC(backup interface) xlcnpde090-baka.mags.com/10.247.176.132 xlcnpde091-baka.mags.com/10.247.176.133 xlcnpde092-baka.mags.com/10.247.176.134 I have 2 client : q-bak.mags.com/10.207.242.1 r-baka.mags.com/10.247.176.1 what should be the bp.conf entries and host entries on master, media & client in order to force backups via respective dedicated V-LAN as per below technotes ?????????????????? http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH37209 http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH54733(especially this technote) SERVER entries in bp.conf SERVER entries in host file xlcnpde089- master/media ? ? ?.... ? ? ?.... xlcnpde090- media ? ? ?.... ? ? ?.... xlcnpde091- media ? ? ?.... ? ? ?.... xlcnpde092- media ? ? ?.... ? ? ?.... q-bak ? ? ?.... ? ? ?.... r-baka ? ? ?.... ? ? ?.... Regards, BharathSolved1.1KViews4likes8CommentsThe job failed with the following error
We have updated BackupExec from 2012 to 2014 and all job are running fine but on a few backup jobs i am receiving following error. In one job i am receiving following error.. Completed status: Failed Final error: 0xe000942a - Backup Exec did not find any resources to include in the backup. Check the backup selections for this job to make sure it includes resources that are available for backup. Final error category: System Errors For additional information regarding this error refer to link V-79-57344-37930 and another job is failing with following error: Completed status: Failed Final error: 0x2000fe07 - FS_NO_MORE Final error category: For additional information regarding this error refer to link V-79-8192-65031 Please help me out in this...Solved5.4KViews3likes3CommentsEnterprise vault for Distributed exchange environment
What is the best bractice for implementing EV in such below environment. I have two main datacenters and one disaster recovery datacenter. One of those MS exchange server is located in main datacenter as two mailboxes databases with DAG and two CAS/HUB with network load balancing (NLB). The other MS exchange server is located in another building as one server with all roles and a second server with mailbox role without DAG and NLB between servers.Solved681Views3likes4Comments