Arctera MR 7.2.1 link is broken
The https://esd.veritas.com/378349/Veritas_Product_Files/DATA_INSIGHT/Updates/Arctera_Information_Governance_7.2.1_ReadMe.txt link for the read me which suggests it should be 4.94 KB in size does not render a file or download a copy. Does this work for anyone else? PixWhere can one download the 7.1.1 (7.1MR1) documentation?
The download has no manuals and I would like to review the known issues in the release notes. I do not see it on the DOcumentation site https://www.veritas.com/content/support/en_US/search-results?q=*&fq=(document_type%3A%22document%22).html for DI product selection. Is there a new Arctera site or another way to receive the documentation for the latest release? I d not see any separate package under https://www.veritas.com/content/support/en_US/downloads/detail.REL746518 Thanks Pix
DI integration with EV
I’m doing DI-EV workflow tests. I’ve set up everything between the 2 tools, but despite numerous attempts to archive a file or the folder, I’m receiving the same error on DI side (version 6.5.0). “[Exception in method Archive:System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[www.symantec.com.EnterpriseVault.API.FileSystemArchiving.Data.TimeoutFault]: The File System Archiving task service failed to start. Check that the File System Archiving task service is enabled in the configuration file, <Enterprise_Vault_installation_folder>\EvFSAArchivingTask.exe.config. (Fault Detail is equal to www.symantec.com.EnterpriseVault.API.FileSystemArchiving.Data.TimeoutFault).]” There is not much on this error on the VERITAS site: https://sort.veritas.com/public/documents/SDI/4.5/windows/productguides/html/sdi_admin/apas06.htm The site states that the error occurs at random and suggest re-submission. I’d done that many times, but the error is not random but consistent. Is there any solution to it? Thank you TomaszReporting on user fails to bulk add users in Data Insight
When testing addition in the lab where I would have User1@production and User1@Lab the user fails to add as unable to resolve: 2023-10-26 14:29:39 WARNING: #{421} [ServerUtils.getUserByLogonName] Unable to resolve user Java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve user at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.ServerUtils.getUserByLogonName(ServerUtils.java:462) at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.ServerUtils.getUserByLogonName(ServerUtils.java:449) at com.symc.matrix.report.util.ReportsUtils.getUsers(ReportsUtils.java:6559) at com.symc.matrix.report.util.ReportsUtils.setCSVValues(ReportsUtils.java:7912) at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.servlets.FileUploadServlet.processReportsCsv(FileUploadServlet.java:776) at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.servlets.FileUploadServlet.processUpload(FileUploadServlet.java:264) at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.servlets.FileUploadServlet.doPost(FileUploadServlet.java:173) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:681) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:764) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:227) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.filters.LoginFilter.doFilter(LoginFilter.java:110) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at com.symc.matrix.ui.server.filters.CacheControlFilter.doFilter(CacheControlFilter.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.filters.HttpHeaderSecurityFilter.doFilter(HttpHeaderSecurityFilter.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:197) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:97) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:540) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:135) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:78) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:359) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:399) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:889) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1735) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1191) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:659) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) 2023-10-26 14:29:39 WARNING: #{421} [ReportsUtils.getUsers] Not able to resolve user/group However if I type in the string used and filter both are returned. Is there a flag to add all found users? Is this a bug or assumption that a large enterprise does not have >1 user with the same name? Is there a known workaround to add the users to the report in bulk? PixHow do I rebuild a whole device's hash?
I am failing to retrieve volumes on a SVM ERROR: V-378-1339-4104: #{7340} [set_data_vserv_hash: 2232] Failed to get volumes info for VServer ERROR: V-378-1339-4077: #{7340} [process_vservers: 3091] Failed to add VServer to allowed hash. WARNING: V-378-1318-2118: #{5232} [get_cmod_shares: 4029] NetAPP ONTAP API Err Errstr: No records found for vserver How do I get the classes to run via the command line to rebuild the hash? ________________________________________________________________________________________ Is it possible to utilize the binaries on the command line to reset the hash on the suspect SVM filer? The only ones I am aware of are --rehash which will rehash all indexes and of course --dirhash Build directory hash (use with caution) --filehash Build file hash (use with caution) but these are not at the device scope. But since it is a device I would not know which index to aim at. CLi discovery fails netapp_util.exe -i 3 –v <name> 2022-06-09 14:59:06 INFO: V-378-1318-1000: #{15148} [__initlog: 386] Logging Initialized successfully 2022-06-09 14:59:06 ERROR: V-378-1318-1055: #{15148} [main: 1259] Error in parsing cmdline args 2022-06-09 14:59:06 INFO: V-378-1318-1058: #{15148} [main: 1273] netapp_util exit code: 1 ref: -i <discovery option> {-v <vserver name>}: Get list of CMod Shares and NFS exports for all VServers or for a specific VServer if -v is provided. Discovery options: 1: Full discovery for both CIFS shares and NFS exports. 2: Test discovery for both CIFS shares and NFS exports. 3: Full discovery for CIFS shares alone. 4: Test discovery for CIFS shares alone. 5: Full discovery for NFS exports alone. 6: Test discovery for NFS exports alone. Any other value results in full discovery of both CIFS & NFS. Appears to be no option on the new service. The knowledgebase returns do not show any value to me in this regard. The Data Insight Hash Utility Tool is to encrypt or decrypt the passwords. not what I am looking for. Article - High sustained latency after ONTAP upgrade to 9.7 P14 and above due to FPolicy EAGAIN (veritas.com) talks about the buffer size we were told to disable in favor of the fix. We have upgraded to fix version PixIf you are confirming versions prior to upgrades or ...
I would suggest one not chose a common file like Webserver or configcli exes. Has anyone seen this in other versions it is kind of expected in hot fixes. but RPs too? Seems the tool versions are not updated with each rolling patch. I have not upgraded the lab to the very latest but am testing - Which file do you pick to verify your scripting worked and return the correct version? PixFederal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) in DI6.4
The implication is that I can only enable it during the upgrade and never alter it (even though there is matrix.fips.enabled$Boolean=), but it is unclear as to the consequence if it is not prevalent in my environment or across every storage device. Since policy is likely not set on the local nodes and I must match to the MS, I am left with a few questions I do not see answered in how Data Insight will utilize it. The Install guide speaks specifically to the Winnas versions supported when disabled. I likely would be able to assume it is enabled for the Government interfacing departments and likely less so for the internal facing departments. Are there known consequences with enabling and interacting with NonFIPS compliant storage / Nodes? Does it relate to classification or also the data stored in indexes primarily? Microsoft's technote referenced implies I should expect no difference. I surmise the difference is whether to install the Kernel Mode Cryptographic Primitives / Cryptographic Primitives libraries on not and am looking to document the consequences on .NET, SSL or other connections in a mixed mode environment. Pix
