DLO Agent workaround on Outlook 2010 64 bits
Hi all, I have a problem with a customer, this problem do not have solution in the actual version and was confirmed to me that comes solved in 2012 version. I was adviced the Beta product and I will test it. So, I init this discussion searching a workaround. The scenario is the following BE 2010 with DLO. The problem is with DLO agent 2010, Windows 7 64 bits and Otulook 2010 64 bits. When the system start, the Outlook sent a message about that there aren't a default mail client. This message appears when you try to open outlook, if you uninstall DLO agent the system works fine. Well, as workaround we uncheck all items under Options in the profile. But this create another problem, it is that the other users, when try to open a PST it is blocked. The outlook sent a message that the pst is busy by another application. Any knows a valid workaround to solve this while we waiting the 2012 version is launched? Regards, CarlosBackup Exec Alert: Job Warning (Server: "DC-XXXXXXXX") An unknown application is deleting files from the following folder:
I am using Backup Exec 2014 on my sever. I recieve the following error in event viewer. Event ID: 33919 Backup Exec Alert: Job Warning (Server: "XXXXXXXX") An unknown application is deleting files from the following folder: C:\ProgramData\Symantec\CRF Files contained in this folder are used by Backup Exec, and deleting them may cause Backup Exec processes to crash. Determine which application is accessing the folder and add the folder to the application's exclusion list. For more information, click the following link: http://entced.symantec.com/entt?product=BE&module=eng-event&error=V-379-33919&build=retail&version=14.1.1786.1093&language=EN&os=Windows_V-6.1.7601_SP-1.0_PL-0x2_SU-0x110_PT-0x2 HOW TO SOLVE THIS ISSUE?
Restore computer from recovery point
When backing up a complete drive, when Icreate a base with several incremental recovery points, if Ineed to restore, I just want to confirm that I do NOT have to restore the base first then a sequential restore using the incrementals in chronological order. I just select the recovery point Iwant to restore from - even thou that recovery point may be a fraction of the size of the base - and that recovery point will restore my drive back to full at the time of that recovery point? Is this correct? So the incremental points must be linked to the base. Thanks Gi