not applicable

9 Topics

Multiple forests
Does anyone know how to configure eDiscovery platform (formerly know as Clearwell) for multiple forests. I can only find where to identify the GC for the ldap, but one GC won't work for the additional forest. Thoughts?
WiTSend
10 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
1.2KViews
0likes
1Comment
eDiscovery in Clearwell: Custodian names not visible in Analysis & Review
As we use EV, the default settings for Custodian Assignment in the collection task did not associate a custodian with the resulting documents. I went back and selected to, 'Create a new custodian using the archive's email adddress' under 'If no match is found:' for each of my 5 collections. and re-ran them for custodian assignment only. I can now see Custodian Data in the Collections > Analytics chart/table. Custodian data also appears in the Collection Sets Charts. Without a clear idea of what else needed to be done, I have tried to re-run post processing and to process without discovery. I still do not see custodian metadata in the Analysis & Review section however. Any ideas on how to accomplish this?
Solved
JRiemsma
11 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
929Views
0likes
2Comments
Clearwell RBAC (ROLE BASE ACCESS CONTORL)
ISSUE: We have many E-Discovery admins in a shared architecture - The problem is that they can add themselves to other cases. QUESTION: Can we make an E-discovery admin policy to only allow them to get to cases coded with XYZ********* cases? Can we allow them to create cases with a name code as well as only give out cases with their name type ex. XYZ can only get XYZ cases without being able to add to ABC cases or messing with ABC cases? The ideal: All XYZ type accounts that are e-discovery only can see XYZ cases and users, can build cases that are new. But can only be seen by XYZ. Likewise ABC users can do the same but can only act on items that are ABC based. Thank you!!!
Solved
BCAM
11 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
654Views
0likes
1Comment
Clearwell - How to search just between two email addresses in Collections
Hi! Just purchased Clearwell and are actually starting to use it. I am looking to search just between two email addresses in the collections step. I can't find a way to do it. I can get everything from AND to the email addresses then filter it down in processing but that is WAY more data than I need. I just want to pull everything between two emails/custodians. Anyone know how to do this? thanks!
Solved
Holly09
11 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
729Views
0likes
1Comment
Clearwell support for Windows 2012
Windows Server 2012 has been out for almost 18 months and the latest version of Clearwell 7.1.5, still doesn't support it. Will Clearwell version 8 run of Server 2012? What are the hardware requirements for Clearwell 8? When will the roadmap/new feature guide for Clearwell 8.0 be released?
Solved
rajupateluk
11 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
2.1KViews
0likes
4Comments
Case sensitive keyword searching in Symantec Clearwell?
Is there a way to conduct a case sensitive keyword search in the Symantec Clearwell eDiscovery platform? A case sensitive search will help eliminate false hits.
Solved
T5
12 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
1.6KViews
2likes
4Comments
Search only the body field - excluding attachments in Clearwell?
I am attempting to only search for keywords in the body of emails (not including attachments). In the pull down box of the "Fields to Search" section, there is no option for a "body" content only search. Is there a way to search only the body content of emails in Clearwell's Advanced Search?
T5
12 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
1.1KViews
1like
2Comments
Audit user
Hi i need to know if there's a way to audit an user (System Manager Role), to view logs or something. In all the logs in log section dont show the activity of the user, or if an user log in to the system, etc. Thanks
Pyroar
13 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
995Views
1like
4Comments
Clearwell tagging question for Predictive coding
We have a question on how PC (Predictive Coding) will handle the analysis if an email body is not privileged but one of the earlier/later replies or forwards is privileged... All messages are indexed (no derived emails) so I believe each email would then be tagged on its own merit, and the prediction will be based on each email and not on the entire thread. What are the thoughts on this from the community? Also, how would this be handled if some of the messages are derived? Thanks for any thoughts/comments.
danielle_levens
13 years ago Place eDiscovery Platform
1KViews
0likes
5Comments