How to audit Discovery Accelerator ?
Hi Everybody, EV version is11.0.1 If it is possible I would like toenable auditingfor Discovery Accelerator. 5 years ago it wasasked inforum discuss about this issue :https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/auditing-actions-taken-discovery-accelerator Auditing situationfor DA still is the same or is there any new work ? Thank you,Solved5.5KViews0likes12Comments
Enterprise Vault Discovery accellerator segregation
I need to create two segregated research groups within DA Group 2 was one can see all custodian and perform searches for all Group 2 (Limited Research) can see and search on only a limited number of custodian cases are created and assigned by a superadmin, not belonging to any of the 2 groups you can implement this solution?1.9KViews0likes5Comments
Discovery Accelerator 11 Search
Hello all, Hoping someone can help me with what is probably some pretty simple questions? Started looking at the Discovery Accelerator 10 Best Practice search guide (did they update anything in 11 that would be different) and trying to make sure I understand how the searching works. Been asked to do several fairly large searches and below is an example of just one of them. We have to do searches by year for specific individuals to and from other specific individuals. The following year would be the same but with whatever specific employees were working that year with the related items.I would like to be able to just do 2 searches per year (Party A to Party B and then Party B to Party A with all of the below criteria). The word align would also have to be able to include any word that has align in it (realignment,alignment, and so on) but the others in quotes would have to be exact. As you can see below, each of these has 3 search terms/values. So what is the best way to go about this if I just want to copy and paste the below into the subject/content field? Can I do the below or something similar and it will work? Align + "EVAAS" + "instructional practice" Align + "value-added" + "instructional practice" Align + "value added" + "instructional practice" Align + "EVAAS+ "IP" Align + "value-added" + "IP" Align + "value added" + "IP" Align + "EVAAS+ "instructional practice rating" Align + "value-added" + "instructional practice rating" Align + "value added" + "instructional practice rating" Align + "EVAAS+ "observation" Align + "value-added" + "observation" Align + "value added" + "observation" Align + "EVAAS+ "observational score" Align + "value-added" + "observational score" Align + "value added" + "observational score" Also, I'm not sure how Discovery Accelerator handles attachments? When doing "IP" in the subject/content fieldis worked fine for the message body but it would also pull messages with attachements that contained words like paticipant, even though the rest of the attachment and the body never contained "IP" specifically. Thanks in advance for any assistance, E1KViews0likes1Comment
CA Database Schema - SQL Querying
Hi there - I am currently looking to build some custom SQLqueriesagainst the CA database but am struggling to understand the various tables and their relationships. Is anyone aware of where I can find a data relationship diagram, CA data model schema, or data dictionary to assist? As a temporary option, I am looking at the IntDiscoveredItems table which I understand are similar to the alerts produced when certain hotwords are hit. However I am unsure how to link this table back to the IntHotwordID table? Any help is much appreciated.1.6KViews0likes2Comments
Monitored IDs by Department Logic
I am searching for the tables used to create theMonitored IDs by Department. The objective is to create an exceptionreport identifying persons who are not assigned to a department. My IT folks believe they can create a solution but have requested souce details forMonitored IDs by Department Thank you.939Views0likes2CommentsCA Hotword search issues
We have a number of departments and searches and in one particular department the search for hotwords always produces 0 hits. Searches for attachments and external (named) recipients works fine. After some testing, I’ve narrowed the problem down to the message route of ‘FROM <dept> to outside the organisation’. I’ve managed to get hotwords searches to produce hits when avoiding the above message route, e.g. by putting in a specific destination domain. The problem appears to be how the search defines what is ‘outside the organisation’. However, this is working in other departments but just not this particular one. Any ideas to resolve this?1KViews1like2Comments
