Restore error(2850)
13/11/2014 12:28:28 PM - begin Restore 13/11/2014 12:28:30 PM - 1 images required 13/11/2014 12:28:30 PM - media NOCC07 required 13/11/2014 12:28:31 PM - restoring image nocidsfe01_1388251387 13/11/2014 12:28:32 PM - Info bpbrm(pid=10880) nocidsfe01 is the host to restore to 13/11/2014 12:28:32 PM - Info bpbrm(pid=10880) telling media manager to start restore on client 13/11/2014 12:28:33 PM - Info bpbrm(pid=9292) nocidsfe01 is the host to restore to 13/11/2014 12:28:33 PM - connecting 13/11/2014 12:28:34 PM - Error bptm(pid=9592) NBJM returned an extended error status: No drives are available (2001) 13/11/2014 12:28:34 PM - requesting resource NOCC07 13/11/2014 12:28:34 PM - Error nbjm(pid=7072) NBU status: 830, EMM status: No drives are available 13/11/2014 12:28:34 PM - Error nbjm(pid=7072) NBU status: 830, EMM status: No drives are available 13/11/2014 12:28:35 PM - Info bpbrm(pid=10880) got ERROR 252 from media manager 13/11/2014 12:28:35 PM - Info bpbrm(pid=10880) terminating bpbrm child 9292 jobid=358731 13/11/2014 12:28:35 PM - restored image nocidsfe01_1388251387 - (extended error status has been encountered, check logs(252)); restore time 0:00:04 13/11/2014 12:28:37 PM - Info bpbrm(pid=9292) start tar32 on client 13/11/2014 12:28:37 PM - Info tar32(pid=28457) Restore started. 13/11/2014 12:28:37 PM - connected; connect time: 0:00:04 13/11/2014 12:28:38 PM - Warning bprd(pid=11020) Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on 27/12/2020 1:23:07 AM 13/11/2014 12:28:39 PM - end Restore; elapsed time: 0:00:11 Restore error(2850) nbemmcmd -listmedia -mediaid NOCC07 D:\Veritas\Volmgr\bin>nbemmcmd -listmedia -mediaid NOCC07 NBEMMCMD, Version: 7.6.0.2 ==================================================================== Media GUID: 36dce3f0-0c39-4e7b-8f0d-a30cccea1600 Media ID: NOCC07 Partner: - Media Type: HCART3 Volume Group: 001_00001_TLD Application: Netbackup Media Flags: 1 Description: Added by Media Manager Barcode: NOCC07 Partner Barcode: -------- Last Write Host: kkbmaster1 Created: 01/12/2010 11:07 Time Assigned: 01/15/2014 09:33 First Mount: 01/21/2010 02:44 Last Mount: 01/15/2014 15:27 Volume Expiration: - Data Expiration: 12/31/2020 17:15 Last Written: 01/15/2014 15:27 Last Read: - Robot Type: TLD Robot Control Host: kkbmedia3 Robot Number: 1 Slot: 36 Side/Face: - Cleanings Remaining: - Number of Mounts: 47 Maximum Mounts Allowed: 0 Media Status: SUSPENDED FULL Kilobytes: 873604774 Images: 7 Valid Images: 7 Retention Period: 14 Number of Restores: 0 Optical Header Size Bytes: 1024 Optical Sector Size Bytes: 0 Optical Partition Size Bytes: 0 Last Header Offset: 13377201 Adamm Guid: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 Rsm Guid: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 Origin Host: NONE Master Host: kkbmaster1 Server Group: UNRESTRICTED_SHARING_GROUP Upgrade Conflicts Flag: Pool Number: 21 Volume Pool: TapeYearly Previous Pool Name: Prod Vault Flags: - Vault Container: - Vault Name: Eject-TLD2 Vault Slot: 354 Session ID: 200 Date Vaulted: 02/13/2014 17:58 Return Date: - Media on Hold: 0 ==================================================================== Command completed successfully. D:\Veritas\Volmgr\bin>Solved5KViews0likes3CommentsDoes anyone actually use EV.cloud or just the on premise EV?
I am researching an email archiving system for my company. Our reseller recommends EV. I agree that EV is a great enterprise level product but feel it might be too high end for our medium sized company. I am hesitant to deploy it due to the complexity as well as the high system requirements. We would end up with more EV servers than we have Exchange servers, which just seems crazy to me. We only have 2 on premise Exchange servers with less than 400 mailboxes and our total amount of email including journaled archives is around 12 TB. With that being said, I aminterested in EV.cloud especially since it saysno required hardware, software or client plug-ins are needed. However, in checking, there is very little information on EV.cloud. There have only been 29 threads created in a 2 year period with one of them asking how to move away from it.The consulting companies don't seem to have the experience or knowledge that they have with the on premise version. Is the product any good? I know Symantec's marketing makes it out to be a great product but would really like to hear ofreal world customer experience. Thank you.Solved3.6KViews3likes7CommentsDistribution List members at time of the email Discovered
Hi, Using Discovery Accelerator 9 we are reviewing an eMail that was sent to a Distribution List. We need to know the members of that Distribution List at the time of the email being sent\received. When exporting the email and clicking on the Distribution List it is resolving against our current Active Directory membership and returning Mailboxes that weren't even created at the time of the email discovered, being sent. Thanks in advance, Cheers, PhilSolved2.2KViews1like8CommentsSymantec Enterprise Vault - UK Partner advice.
Hi, We are currently using Enterprise Vault v10.0.2.1112 for Exchange, SharePoint and File Shares (FSA). Due to issues and concerns we are now considering dropping the SharePoint and FSA components and only retaining Exchange (maybe even dropping that). Can anyone advise on/recommend some UK Partners who can assist us, as i'm sure most of our issues/concerns are down to our set-up and not the product itself. The sweetener for any partners will be the potential consultancy if we decide to stay with Enterprise Vault and upgrade to the latest release, and the possibility of procuring and installing additional Enterprise Vault add-ons. Regards, SurinderSolved1.9KViews0likes5CommentsUnable to open some items via the web app: Failed to get the document from the Storage Service
EV 11.0.1 + CHF2 Windows 2008 R2 Intermittently we're seeing the error "Failed to get the document from the Storage Service" when viewing items and attachments in the web app. We can use 'View Whole Item', no problem. I'm not sure what's going on with the web app. There aren't any errors reported in the Event logs when this problem occurs but I do see this in the IIS logs: 2015-08-20 14:02:00 GET /EnterpriseVault/properties.asp VaultID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&PVID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&SavesetID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EZ%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&attachment=1|-|ASP_0147|500_Server_Error 80 DDD\UNAMEXXX Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+WOW64;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E) 500 0 64 25178 2015-08-20 14:02:00 GET /EnterpriseVault/properties.asp VaultID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&PVID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&SavesetID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EZ%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&attachment=1|-|ASP_0147|500_Server_Error 80 DDD\UNAMEXXX Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+WOW64;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E) 500 0 64 24726 2015-08-20 14:02:00 GET /EnterpriseVault/properties.asp VaultID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&PVID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&SavesetID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EZ%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&attachment=1|-|ASP_0147|500_Server_Error 80 DDD\UNAMEXXX Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+WOW64;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E) 500 0 64 10998 2015-08-20 14:02:00 GET /EnterpriseVault/properties.asp VaultID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&PVID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXvault&SavesetID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%7EZ%7EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&attachment=1|-|ASP_0147|500_Server_Error 80 DDD\UNAMEXXX Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+8.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+WOW64;+Trident/4.0;+SLCC2;+.NET+CLR+2.0.50727;+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729;+.NET+CLR+3.0.30729;+.NET4.0C;+.NET4.0E) 500 0 64 10608 Has anybody seen this "ASP_0147|500_Server_Error" before or have an idea on why I'm seeing it? Some of the info I've come across on the web says it could be a "resource problem" but nothing has been real helpful in getting to the bottom of this.1.8KViews1like3CommentsFormat of displaying Receiver / Sender in DA
The problem is: The format of email address that displaying in Discovery Accelerator is: "<Name Surname> email". For example, "Serhii Kohan skohan@example.com". If the Last Name is not specified, the EV in the search results in the FROM: or TO: fields, write skohan@example.com. But if name specified, it will only display the "Serhii Kohan", and then to find out what is the actually address of the recipient/sender - we have to open source code of mail and look to the header. We'd love to EV display the full address format, or at least only the e-mail address rather than a name. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our main goal is: We need to make a reports of reviewed emails from DA, using SQL query in report template. And we even achieved the result, using complicated query with JOIN clauses. Now, we have the review report include such headers: FROM: ---- TO: ---- SUBJECT: --- ATTACHMENTS: --- DATE: --- MARKS: --- TAGS: --- COMMENTS: --- The problem is, that FROM: / TO: headers include only Name and Surname (for example: Serhii Kohan), instead of full email address, like: "Serhii Kohan skohan@example.com". We suppose that there is a table in some DB of EV, which has Name and Surname with actually email address. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We were researching in SQL DB to find some connection betwen Name Surname and email address. But did not find anything. The TSE said that "This is a default behavior and EV can not display the full address format." and offer to make a feature enhancement. But we know that if there is a possibility to search Sender or Recipient email address by Name or Surname there must be some table in DB which contain such info. PLEASE HELP US TO FIND SOME NONTRIVIAL SOLUTION TO THIS CASE..1.7KViews0likes5CommentsMove Archive - Failing
Hello, I'm running EV version 10 and I'm trying to move some archives from one vault store to another. As part of my testing, I am trying to move some inactive users to validate the process. Everything seemed to be going pretty smoothly until yesterday (we did need to reconfigure and test some backup settings for the new vault store). Everything is now failing during any step of the process (I have archives in each step 1 through 5). New test move archive operations also fail on all copy operations when I start it until the process fails after 50 attempts. The archive logs are not helpful, this is the error description. An internal failure occurred. Internal Error: 'Unspecified error (0x80004005)'. Error code: 80040306 My initial thought was maybe something was stuck in backup mode, but I checked everything and that is not the case. I also re-created the move archive with the following process (keep in mind these are not active users, so there is no new writes going to the 'new' archive'). 1. After the move archive operation fails, I delete the operation. 2. I Delete the 'new archive' 3. Rename the original archive (remove the date appended to the end) 4. Create new move archive operation Would someone be able to point me where I should look next? I seem to be out of options and I'm really stumped as to why this is all failing now.Solved1.2KViews0likes5Comments