Netbackup 7.6 BasicDisk and Media Server HA on MS Cluster
Hi, I have installed two Netbackup Master Server on two node of MS Windows Cluster 2012 and I have installed two Stand-Alone Media server on to phyzical server. I want to run High Availability in backup and restore between my media servers and storage unit (BasicDisk). Is it possible that Add two media server in MS Cluster and create a Role for media server services and make a Shared Disk on MS Cluster in Failover mode ?! After create role of Services and Disk on Cluster, Create Storage unit with Shared Disk Volume Letter and Role Virtual Name as a storage unit media server. Thanks for your help.646Views0likes1Comment
Duplication via SAN
Hi Guys, I'm having problem to make my SLP to run via SAN and hope you guys can help me or give me some ideas on this. Here's my environment details. All Netbackup running on version 7.7.2 1 master server - Linux Redhat 41 clients - Linux Redhat There is no dedicated media server On Master Server: We have 2 HBAs. One is 16GB (Qlogic QLE2660), which is not supported by Veritas (yet) based on hardware compatibility matrix. So we added a temporary HBA (Qlogic QLE2460) with 4GB speed. Driver successfully installed on QLE2460. We successfully configured FT backup for SAN clients based on below zoning setup. SAN Client Zone Member Client - initiator Master Server - target (4GB HBA) SAN storage - initiator/target The backup setup for all SAN client is to back them up to disk (which is on master server). And then it will be duplicated to tape via SLP. The issue is currently all the SLP is running via LAN and not FT. I wonder why since both the disk and tape library are connected to master server. And to think that tape drive is on FC but data transfer to LAN is just doesn't make sense to me. So we zone the 16GB HBA (initiator) together with the 4GB HBA (target), setting the master server to be a SAN client as well (bpclntcmd -sanclient 1), thinking that perhaps we can make the data transfer from the 16GB card to 4GB card. The transport type when we backing up master server by itself now changed to FT. But it failed with FT Pipe could not be opened (83). Can we do a zoning for master server as below? Master Server Zone Member Master Server - initiator (16GB HBA) Master Server - target (4GB HBA) Tape library - target Basically we have 2 problems now. Based on what I explained above. Is it possible SLP to run on FT? Or do we need to have dedicated FT media server? Error 83 - Is it because both HBA belongs to the master server? Please help!~ Regards, Jason AnthoniusSolved2.2KViews0likes6Comments
Should I use the same storage for OS part and Backup DB part?
We are trying to set up Linux server for the backup server, and are using NetApp storage for the both OS part and Backup data part. We have two different type of stroage both from NetApp. One is FAS which has a lot of storage based functions, and support NFS, SnopShots, DR replications. The other one is E-series has less functions and primarily for the backup data images. Should I seperate OS and Data part , one on FAS, and the other on E, or does that matter. Thanks!Solved2KViews0likes12Comments
Library not enabled - Drive Control is AVR
We have just added to our environment, a new NBU 7.6.0.2 Linux media server that sits behind a firewall. The new media server is configured for SSO and has access to all SAN attached drives in-scope, emm server shows correctly, all drives show UP and robotic definition looks normal. The NetBackup console shows the library connection for the new media server as NOT enabled and all associated tape drives are in AVR control. We have popped some holes through the FW for port 1556 but I'm wondering if there are other ports required? Port 1556 is opened between the new media server, master server and the library control host which is also configured seperately. The library is completely functional for everything except the new media server. Any ideas what direction I should be looking in? Thx, -KevinSolved1.1KViews0likes2CommentsInventory Window does not show any robots in Java Console
Hi Experts, Environment: Master and Media servers running on Linux, NBU version 7.6.0.2. Tape Libraries: StorageTek SL3000, Firmware 3.61 We recently replaced LTO4 Tape Drives with LTO6 Tape Drives on our 2 STK SL3000 Tape libraries. The upgrade of Drives was done 1 week apart for each library. First upgrade went ahead without any issues but after the upgrade of 2nd library we were not able to scan tape drives and Robots. We Engaged Symantec Support and they did some changes in the Device Mappings files. After the change in the device mappings file, cople of tries failed but then in the 3rd try Robots, Drives and Storage units were configured. We performed the inventory and every thing looked fine. Couple days later we had to run an inventory and when we clicked Robot > Inventory Robot from Java Console, the window appeared only with the master server name in it and without any robots showing in the window. We tried Netbackup Administration Console and tried the inventory, it did show both the robots and was able to run the inventory. During the troubleshooting we have updated the Device Mapping file to latest version 1.23. Checked all media servers for consistency. This issue has been going on for almost 3 weeks and Symantec has not yet able to resolve it. Any help will be appreciated. Other symptoms: 1. Robot Diagnostics fails for 1 library (all 4 steps). 2. Robtest from the media servers controlling the library is successful. 3. Scan -changer shows the robot 4. Scan for a drive via Wizard configures the drive as standalone. 5. PC running Java Console is out of equation, issue is persistent from any PC.Solved1.8KViews0likes11Comments
How to backup Netapp Ex2724 San with Netbackup 6
Hi All We have purchased a Netapp E series SAn EX2724,this can be managed only through SANtricity Stirage Manager Client. I need to know How I can configure Netbackup software v 7 to backup the LUN that is provided by the above NetappSAN to following operating system, Solaris, VMWARE ESXi 5.0, Windows and also the oracle database and also duplicate it on the Tape Drive. Note: As per our companys instruction we do not want to install netbackup client on the solaris operating system, We want to directly backup the LUN that is provided to Solaris operating. We have mounted that LUN on the Solaris operating system, and a script on solaris dump some data on the lun. We will install Netbackup software on Windows server 2008. Please let me whether Netabackup can Backup Netapp Ex2724 series SAn, Do I Require any plugins for the same Regards VivekSolved1.3KViews1like5Comments
Netbackup Appliance LUN verification
Hi, Our company just bought Netbackup Appliance and currently in the midst of setting the appliance. Now there is 2 HBA card used with 4 port already zone in SAN switch. Storage we used Netapp and all the WWN already insert in initiator group and present it to all related LUN. I've perform query in the appliance ( Manage>FibreChannel>Scan and Manage>FibreChannel>Show). The result all is Netapp storage but in the format that I can't understand and doing comparison with the Netapp LUN. So the question is, how to exactly to verify that the LUN already zoning to the Netbackup Appliance? ThanksSolved1.5KViews0likes2CommentsHP Tape device is detected as Disk device type in solaris machine.
Hi All, Need one hep from all experts here. one of tape drive from HP ESL library is connected to Solaris server and it is detecting as Disk device not as tape device. actaully it should be tape devices as it is physical tape drive. Pos Port_ID Hard_Addr Port WWN Node WWN Type 0 150200 0 2001001321443ed4 2000001321443ed4 0x1 (Tape device) 1 150300 0 2004001321443ed4 2003001321443ed4 0x0 (Disk device) 2 158500 0 200d001321443102 200c001321443102 0x1 (Tape device) cfgadm O/P:- c8::2004001321443ed4 unavailable connected configured unknown need experts suggestions here what can be done to get this done. or anyone faced this kind of issue. Thanks MaheshSolved1KViews0likes2CommentsSeeking help for a new configuration..
Hello All, We have recently introduced a new setup of 5230Appliance in our environment and now in the process of setting up backup clients on it. There are a Set of servers whose data is exceeding TB,s and we are planning to set these servers as SAN Media Servers. Is this possible ? Any pointers/link that I can reference.Solved636Views0likes3CommentsGetting status 10 error - Hyper V clients backed up using FT transport - Netbackup appliance 5230
Hi all, We have added a new netbackup appliance 5230 in our environment. I tried to do a SAN client for 6 node Hyper V cluster in which the OS is Windows 2012. When I tried backup using the normal windows level of my hyper V clusters it does via FT transport but when I tried backup one of the VM, it tries to backup via FC but failing with error status 10 (media allocation failed). Help me to resolve this issue. Thanks, Jaffer1.2KViews0likes4Comments
Netbackup 7.6 BasicDisk and Media Server HA on MS Cluster
Hi, I have installed two Netbackup Master Server on two node of MS Windows Cluster 2012 and I have installed two Stand-Alone Media server on to phyzical server. I want to run High Availability in backup and restore between my media servers and storage unit (BasicDisk). Is it possible that Add two media server in MS Cluster and create a Role for media server services and make a Shared Disk on MS Cluster in Failover mode ?! After create role of Services and Disk on Cluster, Create Storage unit with Shared Disk Volume Letter and Role Virtual Name as a storage unit media server. Thanks for your help.Getting status 10 error - Hyper V clients backed up using FT transport - Netbackup appliance 5230
Hi all, We have added a new netbackup appliance 5230 in our environment. I tried to do a SAN client for 6 node Hyper V cluster in which the OS is Windows 2012. When I tried backup using the normal windows level of my hyper V clusters it does via FT transport but when I tried backup one of the VM, it tries to backup via FC but failing with error status 10 (media allocation failed). Help me to resolve this issue. Thanks, Jaffer