Check out the newest Veritas Education update:
Veritas Alta Archiving: Administration is now available for registration! Take this new course and gain the necessary skills required to leverage Veritas Alta Archiving to perform data discovery for your organization’s compliance needs. In Veritas Alta Archiving: Administration, you will learn how to configure and use Veritas Alta Archiving using the Veritas Alta View Compliance & Governance console to capture, ingest, supervise, and discover data. The course is designed to enable compliance officers and corporate legal IT personnel to meet supervision and discovery requirements while reducing compliance risk and controlling costs. The course includes simulations that enable you to learn new skills and transfer those skills into your working environment: Veritas Alta Archiving: Administration is available in the following delivery methods: Instructor-led training (ILT) – 3 days Virtual Instructor-led Training (VILT) – 3 days Self-paced More information on training delivery methods, class availability and registration instructions can be found here. If you have any questions, please contact education.system@veritas.com.
Legal Hold Notices
Is there a solution within the Clearwell Legal Hold module/tool to remove the confirmation link and language from the reminders and release notices? This is being asked because there is no relevant info for the custodian in the reminder and it causes confusion. Unless, there is a way of noting it in the reminder and I am not aware of it. As for the “To view your pending and active legal hold notices, please copy and paste this…”, section can Clearwell list the custodian’s pending legal holds/ links? Example of Reminder: To: Joe Custodian Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 11:08 AM From: Generic LEGAL HOLD mailbox (Company X) Cc: [insert Legal Team member names here] Subject: LEGAL HOLD REMINDER: ### Investigation (Sample) Hello and thank you for reaching out. You can disregard the confirmation link. This is a routine reminder for the legal hold. For details of the hold, please refer to the original hold email. Thank you. Company X Legal Team ___________________________________ From: Joe Custodian Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 10:08 AM To: Company X LEGAL HOLD Cc: [insert Legal Team member names here] Subject: LEGAL HOLD REMINDER: ### Investigation (Sample) Hi, There are no details in the email and when I click on the link, I cannot see any HOLD on my name. What am I supposed to do? [image of Symantec Clearwell eDiscovery Platform reminder-- Pending and Active Holds reminder] ----- From: Compnay X LEGAL HOLD Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 6:26 PM To: [Joe Custodian] Cc: [insert Legal Team member names here] Subject: LEGAL HOLD REMINDER: ### Investigation (Sample) We just wanted to remind you that the legal hold below is still in effect, and you are still under an obligation to preserve the materials you previously retained in response to this hold. Please let us know if you have any questions. Thanks. Go To Confirmation Page To view your pending and active legal hold notices, please copy and paste this [https://aus….link noted here] on your browser.
Clearwell Question: how do I identify the group of files which have been put into multiple folders
Hello. My total file count is incorrect because the same file was duplicated into multiple folders. How can I quickly identify a file that is in more than one location. Basically if 2 objects are identical that reside in 2 different locations, please bring them back in a query. Thanks Liza Hackett
Clearwell tagging question for Predictive coding
We have a question on how PC (Predictive Coding) will handle the analysis if an email body is not privileged but one of the earlier/later replies or forwards is privileged... All messages are indexed (no derived emails) so I believe each email would then be tagged on its own merit, and the prediction will be based on each email and not on the entire thread. What are the thoughts on this from the community? Also, how would this be handled if some of the messages are derived? Thanks for any thoughts/comments.
