09-07-2023 08:11 AM - edited 09-07-2023 08:13 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-08-2023 12:32 AM
I checked the release note for VSR 23.1. But I never find new features that are related with the performance.
https://www.veritas.com/content/support/en_US/doc/VSR_23.1_Release_Notes_EN
If many VSS shadow copies are stored in the backup source volume, the backup performance will be lower than before. Also, the performance may be lower due to fragments.
To be honest, the standard compression is the most effective for the backup time. High compression always takes more time than standard compression, and the compression rate for high compression is not high than expectation.
I recommend to use the standard compression.
09-07-2023 11:37 PM
Not yet.
09-08-2023 12:32 AM
I checked the release note for VSR 23.1. But I never find new features that are related with the performance.
https://www.veritas.com/content/support/en_US/doc/VSR_23.1_Release_Notes_EN
If many VSS shadow copies are stored in the backup source volume, the backup performance will be lower than before. Also, the performance may be lower due to fragments.
To be honest, the standard compression is the most effective for the backup time. High compression always takes more time than standard compression, and the compression rate for high compression is not high than expectation.
I recommend to use the standard compression.
09-08-2023 05:20 AM
10-01-2023 07:29 PM
Additional information: Only high compression cuts the target disk rate in half. No compression, standard compression, and medium compression do not affect the target disk write rate at all. So I've adjusted my compression rate to medium for now to get the best compression without a performance penalty. I have to say I have no explanation for this. CPU utilization is low even during high compression and the GPU is not being used.