Uninstalling Veritas Storage Foundation makes Disk Management unavailable
We use VMWare Lab Manager to deploy Windows servers from a template. I noticed disk space was an issue on some of our Windows 2003 servers. My boss said we do not need Veritas Storage Foundation 5.1 for Windows Client and Server Components. After removing both I cannot access Disk Management in Computer Management. The error is "Unable to connect to Logical Disk Manager Service." I cannot manually start the Logical Disk Manager service either. When I try the error is "The Dependency service or group failed to start." I looked at the dependencies like RPC etc but that did not fix it. Short of re-installing Storage Foundation are there any solutions? Any help would be greatly appreciated.Solved957Views0likes1CommentDeporting/Importing Disk Group in VMware.
Hello. I am running SFHA 5.1 in a VMware environment. I created a 2 node cluster and the nodes failover perfectly. However when i create a disk group on a shared bus and deport it from the current node. It does not show up for importing in the other node. I have created the IP, NIC and VmDG resources and they are all online on the node the disk group was created on. However when i try to fail them over. the VmDG faults as it is not able to import itself on the other node. I tried both Windows server 2003 and 2008 and the problem persisted. Please note that i ran the '' Vxclus usesystembus ON '' command to enable the shared bus. I would really appreciate your help in this regard. Thanks Umair.Solved1.5KViews0likes7CommentsCan't create a mirror in SFW 5.1 SP1 under the VMWare server
I have a Windows 2008 R2 server under a VMWare host. I did install the SFW 5.1 SP1 and I created the disk. But when I would be create a mirror on this server I got the error messages. (See attachement). Couldsomebody to help for me in this probllem? PeterSolved892Views0likes2CommentsFile-Server | physical or over VMware vSphere? Need advice
Dear all, maybe you have a suggestion for me. We are running two SF 5.1 SP1 [Enterprise with Option MS Cluster Enterprise] on two MS Server 2003 Enterprise R2 x64 Cluster Nodes right know. There are some storage-arrays [DAS] directly on the server-machines - clustering is possible, because of two controllers in the disk-arrays. And there is some real SAN-storage over FC. My vision/planning for the future is to build up more storage in the SAN over FC or iSCSI to get away from DAS-storage and to manage all of it over SF (again). We also planning to virtualize our servers (up to 6-7 servers (Exchange, DFS, DC/DNS, Lizenzmanager-Server, etc.)) to run all of them on one or two physical servers; maybe a third standby-ESX. So there is the question to virtualize both of the enterprise cluster nodes and let them run as virtual machines or let them stay as physical machines? My pros: • "double failsafe", because the enterprise servers are cluster nodes right know [failsafe 1] and if the physical ESX is going down this virtual machine(s) will switch automatically to the second ESX [failsafe 2]. • Faster server-hardware change in the future. Build up a new ESX on more performant hardware; move the vm-server to it; shut down the old ESX which isn't performant enough anymore - no downtime. ...ok, ok, I have a cluster, so changing hardware would be possible without downtime, too. • Maybe better possibility to trunk the networkports. I'm not using vSphere right now, I only remembering some stuff from VMware webcasts. • Betterutilization of the physical hardware! That's why you will virtualize all servers. • Making snapshots before upgrade software on the servers. Faster "recovery" of the old status. "Never touch a running system" is the past. • Better allocation of the physical RAM to different servers. My cons: • Will SF run as good as it does on the physical environment right now? Or are there any restrictions - maybe because of drivers, the hypervisor, anything else? • Will SF be (more) performant than right now or will it slow down everything, especially if I use VxCache with 8GB RAM or more? • I need lots of RAM Would be nice to here some comments or another ideas from you. Thanks in advance.2KViews0likes4Comments