EV 11.0.1 CH3 - Journal Tasks Falling Behind
Hi Symantec Community, I am running 4 VMWare VMs with EV 11.0.1 CHF3 all with Windows Server 2012 (not R2). We are running Archiving on 8 Exchange 2010 SP3 Mailbox servers and Journaling 1 Exchange 2010 SP3 mailbox server. Two of the EV servers are dedicated to Exchange Mailbox Archiving (4 tasks - 1 per Exchange server - staggered timing), and two of them are dedicated to Journaling (3 tasks - all same Exchange server). The issue is with our Exchange Journal mailboxes getting hammered with load that the EV Journaling servers cannot keep up. Servers' Specs: Archiving/Directory Server1 - 16 cores/16 GB RAM Archving Server2 - 8 cores/16 GB RAM Journaling Server3 - 8 cores/16 GB RAM - 3 mailbox targets (2 active and 1 inactive) Journaling Server4 - 8 cores/16 GB RAM - 2 mailbox targets (1 active & 1 inactive) Targets: Journal-Inactive (not being Journaled via Exchange, just trying to catch up) Journal-Inactive-2 (not being Journaled via Exchange, just trying to catch up) Journal-Active (Journaled via Exchange databases) Journal-Active-2 (Journaled via Exchange databases) The inactive mailboxes are no longer being Journaled via Exchange databases, but the active ones are via Exchange database level journaling. We have approximately 300,000 emails journaled per day, and we've allocated two dedicated servers to balance this load. We have two Journal Vault Stores writing to the same EMC Centerea. After much troubleshooting with Symantec and our vendor, we have NOT reached a solution on why our Journaling stalls out. My tasks are set to 10 concurrent connections with 10,000 items per pass for the inactive mailboxes, and the active ones are set to 5 concurrent connections with 5000 items per pass. Each Vault Store has it's own SQL database on a beefy physical server. The physical SQL box has 20 cores and 256 GB of RAM. I regularly perform offline maintenance on the affected databases, per the TECHNOTE from Symantec, but this only has a temporary effect on the speed/frequency of archiving via the Journaling tasks. I have noticed that we encounter many DCOM errors in the EV logs, and there is also a number of C-Clip errors regarding missing or failed savesets. The MSMQ queues are within reasonable limits, but I've noticed that the Storage Queue Limits are being met (250,000, which is the limit on the server level within Admin Console). Does anyone know if there is a precedent for this issue, and how I may be able to resolve it? Symatec support has had very limited success with troubleshooting, so I have come here for some additional support. Thanks in advance! Josh668Views0likes1CommentFSA: moving Files to mountpoints
Hi there, Environment: EV10.0.4CHF3 on Windows Server 2012 + Fileserver (w. FSA-Agent) on Windows Server 2008R2 The LUN of the Fileserver is reaching its max.size of 2TB (MBR, not GPT) and we have to reorganise the Shares -> so we´ve made plans to move the Shares to dedicated LUN´s and present it as mountpoint. So far so good. As the Shares containing Mixed large files and mixed with Placeholders and Not-Placeholders, I´m unsure how to go on in this case. Would my plan work: add new LUN to Fileserver and add it as Mountpoint rename old share - stop fsa-task add new Mountpoint to EV (archive-point) robocopy files fsautil - move ph start task I´m trying to access HOWTO37836, but i got an "not existing" -> is the a "hidden" best practise? What i´ve to overthink? any concerns about my plans?Solved1.6KViews0likes6CommentsEnterprise Vault Upgrade(OS and Hardware)
We have EV 9.0.4 running on Dell PowerEdge 2800. The OS is Windows 2003 R2 (Enterprise Addition). The EV databases are on a separate SQL 2005 server. Since Windows 2003 server support will end by mid of this year we are looking to migrate EV onto a virtual platform. I need help getting started with an upgrade. Any help would be appricated. I need to move the EV and SQL DBs to new server (virtual, and on new OS) Exchange 2010 Standard (separate virtual machaine). DA is also on EV server. Thank you.Solved1.7KViews0likes10CommentsEnterprise Vault Add-in in VDI Environment
Hello, We are currently deploying VDI solution where for our users. I have built Windows 8.1 Ent template with all the required softwares installed including Outlook 2013 and the Symantec Add-in plugin. I have noticed when I launch the outlook for the first time, it asks to process the enable wizard in order to enable the Enterprise Vault Add-in. Following the wizard for Persistant Desktop users works fine as this wizard has to run once only, but for the users who has Pooled Desktops it's quite challange. Everyday they have to run the wizard as their desktops are not persistant. Is there a way to auto launch the add-in without prompting the user to follow this wizard everytime? Is there any other recommendations when it comes to Enterprise Vault for Exchange 2007 and performance for VDI envrionment when users tries to fetch an archived items? Highly appreciate your input. Regards,Solved2.7KViews0likes18CommentsEVIndexing issue & Call with Support
Hi, Since upgrading to EV 11.0.1 we've had to reinstall the Index redistributable 4 times in 2 months. Clearly indicating something wrong. Having just got off the phone with Support i wanted to sanity check what ive been told as im not convinced. We have been using EV on a VM for 7 years and its been bullet proof really, we ran EV10.0.1 - 10.0.4 for 2 years on a 4x vCPU 8G RAM and it was fine. I understand with EV11.0.1 its brought about some great new features and extra bits and therfore more resource intensive but he has told me to give the VM 32 cores and 32G RAM, move the pagefile to a seperate disk also. Do any of you see any value in this? I do monitor the CPU and RAM daily and the only time it looks stressed is during the mailbox run in the evening, which i would expect. We have a compellent SAN thats tiered storage (SSD\FC\Iscsi), so i cant see how moving the pagefile is going to have any improvements, 32 cores and then double the ram to 32G i feel like ive been fobbed off. Anyone got any opinions? Regards705Views0likes6CommentsBacking up with Arcserve UDP
Hi there, Hopefully someone will be able to help with this, we are moving over to Arcserve UDP for backups, we have left EV until last. Can anyone confirm this is a compatible way to backup the Vault data and indexes? We will carry on with pre and post tasks to set VSG's and INdex to read only. Its a D2D solution - UDP backup is inremental, from the Day 1 full backup we will have a 90 day rolling incemental backup - principly the data changed is backed up but from the restore point its full recovery points per day. Are there any consideration we need to make when moving over to this? Any help here would be much appreciated. ThanksSolved1.1KViews1like4CommentsMigrating a v11 EV Cluster to a single server
Hi I'm taking on a migration of an Enterprise Vault 11.0.1 server which is currently based on a Microsoft cluster and it will be migrated to a new single VM. I've successfully used the ServerMigrationWizard before to migrate to new servers when we went from v9 to v10 on 64-bit hardware and I've read various articles and posts around migrating v10 servers. What I am unable to determine is whether or not the current migration wizard supports v11? I've also read TECH141481 being the v9 manual way of doing the move, but again not entirely sure that this will still be valid. Can anyone offer any advice please? ThanksSolved1.1KViews0likes3CommentsChanging Enterprise Vault Disk Drive
Hello, I have Symantec Enterprise Vault version 11. running on a VM and subsequant MS SQL Server on saperate VM. Both VMs have 2 hard disks, each hard disk allocated from different LUN. Once disk for OS and the other for Data. Enterprise Vault keep eating disk space and every time we extend the dis space, unfortuantly the extension of the disk space is going wrong every time and it shows that the other dirves which has been extened to the original volume. The current volme (Drives E:\) is 290 GB Now, I'm thinking of replacing the volume which contains the Archives Vault Data with bigger volme. The old disk extension was added as different disk and extending the E:\ drive from those disks.. Which I think it's a bad idea since the VMDK disk is thin provisioned where it can be increased from the VM itself and use Diskpart command to extend the Volume. To make it short, what is the procedure of making changing the drive of Index Vault; 1. Stop put Vauls in offline / maintenance mode. 2. Stop EV services. 3. Put SQL DBs in offline mode. 4. Add new Drive with bigger volume and Backup/Restore the contents of Drive E:\ to the new drive added 5. Change the drive letter back to E:\. Does this will work? Please share your experiance. Regards,Solved1.3KViews0likes5CommentsUpgrading and Moving EV 10 to new servers
Hello, I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish two goals with Enterprise Vault 10. 1. Upgrade EV 10 to EV 11. 2. Moving EV 11 to Windows 2012 R2 server and split out the SQL server to a separate Windows 2012 R2 server. I currently have a single vmWare virtualized Windows 2008 R2 server running SQL Server 2005 and all of the EV 10.0.0.1316 services. I would like to split the SQL databases off to their own virtualized server (Windows 2012 R2 and whatever lateset SQL server it can run on) and then move EV to a new virtualized server (Windows 2012 R2). Is it better to upgrade first and then move to new servers or move to new servers and then upgrade? Also is there any documentation that outlines these steps? Thanks!Solved700Views0likes2CommentsHas anyone redirected virtual vault cache to a network location?
An issue we have been up against: We have a handfull of citrix servers, serving up desktops and apps (outlook among them). Users want access to their vault and vault cache, so we have the EV outlook add-in, installed on Outlook. Our virtual vault cache is set at 1gb. With hundreds of remote users, on a single server this isnt TOO bad, but when you add HA to the mix, and you have multiple published desktops, then a user will have multiple copies of their virtual vault cache (one on each server hosting an instance of Outlook). We are seeing 2 issues: VV cache is quickly consuming large amounts of disk space across the business as a whole and VV cache is taking an excessive amount of time for first synchronization. Some users are seeing times of up to 45 minutes to do an initial synchronization. I am not sure where the bottlenecks from this are, but it seems to be happening lately and had not had an issue with it before. THis made us think maybe we could use folder redirection and keep a single copy of their vault cache on a file server. Has anyone experimented with anything like this? Any comments/suggestions on it? Other ideas on tackling this issue? Thank you NateSolved1.5KViews0likes9Comments