Steps to follow when upgrading Master Server Operating System
Good Day, I have to do a Server OS Upgrade on my NetBackup 8.0 Master Server. Current OS = MS Server 2008 R2 Standard, Sp1 64Bit. Upgrade to = MS Server 2012 R2 Standard, Sp1 64Bit. My Backups currently writes to Data Domain via OST Plugin. Please advise the proper steps (Backups / Installation process)I need to take to make sure my Server OS Upgrade / NetBackup Installation runs successfully. thanks VIKASH1.5KViews0likes1CommentDeduplication Appliances 1.4.5 is now available!
I'm very pleased to announce that the next Release Updates for Deduplication Appliances is now available! NetBackup 5000/5020/5030 Deduplication Appliances 1.4.5 is the latest patch release and can be applied on top of 1.4.3.1 or 1.4.4. This cumulative release contains almost 900 fixes! It also includes the following new features:481Views1like0CommentsNetBackup Appliances 2.6.0.3 is now available!
I’m extremely happy to announce that NetBackup Appliances 2.6.0.3 is now Generally Available! NetBackup 2.6.0.3 is the latest update for NetBackup 52xx Appliances and the equivalent Appliance patch release to NetBackup 7.6.0.3. It can be applied in an upgrade to Appliances running ANY 2.5.x or 2.6.0.x version.412Views2likes0CommentsNetBackup Appliances 2.6.0.2 is now available!
I’m extremely happy to announce that NetBackup Appliances 2.6.0.2 is now Generally Available! NetBackup 2.6.0.2 is the latest update for NetBackup 52xx Appliances and the equivalent Appliance patch release to NetBackup 7.6.0.2. It can be applied in an upgrade to Appliances running ANY 2.5.x or 2.6.0.x version.382Views0likes0CommentsNetBackup Appliances 1.4.4 and 2.5.3 are now available!
I'm very pleased to announce that the next Release Updates for NetBackup Appliances is now available! NetBackup 5000/5020/5030 Deduplication Appliances 1.4.4 is the equivalent Appliance patch release to NetBackup PureDisk 6.6.5. This release contains almost 500 fixes!313Views1like1CommentDefensible Deletion: The Cornerstone of Intelligent Information Governance
The struggle to stay above the rising tide of information is a constant battle for organizations. Not only are the costs and logistics associated with data storage more troubling than ever, but so are the potential legal consequences. Indeed, the news headlines are constantly filled with horror stories of jury verdicts, court judgments and unreasonable settlements involving organizations that failed to effectively address their data stockpiles. While there are no quick or easy solutions to these problems, an ever increasing method for effectively dealing with these issues is through an organizational strategy referred to as defensible deletion. A defensible deletion strategy could refer to many items. But at its core, defensible deletion is a comprehensive approach that companies implement to reduce the storage costs and legal risks associated with the retention of electronically stored information (ESI). Organizations that have done so have been successful in avoiding court sanctions while at the same time eliminating ESI that has little or no business value. The first step to implementing a defensible deletion strategy is for organizations to ensure that they have a top-down plan for addressing data retention. This typically requires that their information governance principals – legal and IT – are cooperating with each other. These departments must also work jointly with records managers and business units to decide what data must be kept and for what length of time. All such stakeholders in information retention must be engaged and collaborate if the organization is to create a workable defensible deletion strategy. Cooperation between legal and IT naturally leads the organization to establish records retention policies, which carry out the key players’ decisions on data preservation. Such policies should address the particular needs of an organization while balancing them against litigation requirements. Not only will that enable a company to reduce its costs by decreasing data proliferation, it will minimize a company’s litigation risks by allowing it to limit the amount of potentially relevant information available for current and follow-on litigation. In like manner, legal should work with IT to develop a process for how the organization will address document preservation during litigation. This will likely involve the designation of officials who are responsible for issuing a timely and comprehensive litigation hold to custodians and data sources. This will ultimately help an organization avoid the mistakes that often plague document management during litigation. The Role of Technology in Defensible Deletion In the digital age, an essential aspect of a defensible deletion strategy is technology. Indeed, without innovations such as archiving software and automated legal hold acknowledgements, it will be difficult for an organization to achieve its defensible deletion objectives. On the information management side of defensible deletion, archiving software can help enforce organization retention policies and thereby reduce data volume and related storage costs. This can be accomplished with classification tools, which intelligently analyze and tag data content as it is ingested into the archive. By so doing, organizations may retain information that is significant or that otherwise must be kept for business, legal or regulatory purposes – and nothing else. An archiving solution can also reduce costs through efficient data storage. By expiring data in accordance with organization retention policies and by using single instance storage to eliminate ESI duplicates, archiving software frees up space on company servers for the retention of other materials and ultimately leads to decreased storage costs. Moreover, it also lessens litigation risks as it removes data available for future litigation. On the eDiscovery side of defensible deletion, an eDiscovery platform with the latest in legal hold technology is often essential for enabling a workable litigation hold process. Effective platforms enable automated legal hold acknowledgements on various custodians across multiple cases. This allows organizations to confidently place data on hold through a single user action and eliminates concerns that ESI may slip through the proverbial cracks of manual hold practices. Organizations are experiencing every day the costly mistakes of delaying implementation of a defensible deletion program. This trend can be reversed through a common sense defensible deletion strategy which, when powered by effective, enabling technologies, can help organizations decrease the costs and risks associated with the information explosion.1.1KViews1like10CommentsBreaking News: Recusal Motion in Da Silva Moore Case Denied
In what might be characterized as the most anticipated ruling in the eDiscovery world over the past several months, the district court in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe today denied the plaintiffs’ motion to recuse the Honorable Andrew Peck as the assigned magistrate to that action. In rejecting the plaintiffs’ recusal request, United States District Court Judge Andrew Carter held that “Judge Peck’s decision accepting computer-assisted review, reached upon consideration of the applicable law, was not influenced by bias, nor did it create any appearance of bias.” Judge Carter’s decision is particularly significant as it leaves undisturbed Judge Peck’s orders regarding the use of predictive coding and his declaration that computer-assisted review in eDiscovery is “acceptable in appropriate cases.” Moreover, Judge Carter gave another judicial imprimatur to predictive coding with his determination that it “does not inherently favor one party over the other in this case.” With today’s ruling, Judge Carter has perhaps finally brought to a close the contentious sideshow that nearly overshadowed the first known case involving the use of predictive coding in eDiscovery. With its potential to reduce the costs and delays associated with the review of ESI, predictive coding holds incredible promise for the future of eDiscovery.587Views0likes2Comments