Tag:"community supported data connectors"

NetBackup Appliance Call Home Feature
Hello, We arerunning Netbackup Master Serverwith version7.6.0.3 on Windows Server 2008 sp1 r2 and ourNetbackup media servers are Ntebackup Appliances 5230. Recently, I read about the Call Home feature that supported by the Netbackup Appliance and decided to activate this feature on our environment. The problem is that to reach Symantec server to send them the call home logs, in out evironment we must go through FWthat goes to a proxy server and them go outside to the WAN. Moreover, we got some seperated networks of the Appliances that dont have any network between each other but each appliance can connect to the same master server. My question is if there it any way to make my Master server as a proxy server that all the appliances will send to hime the Call Home logs and this master server will transfer all the data to the main proxy server that will sebd all the data to Symantec. Thank you, Sisso
Solved
Sisso
10 years ago Place NetBackup Appliance
1.3KViews
0likes
6Comments
Unable Access Second Partition After Formatting Primary Partition
I recently had fully encrypted hard disk (Toshiba mq01abd075), operating system (Windows 7 Professional), two partition. C (146 GB) and D (548 GB) and 4 GB Unallocated space. I ran the system restore for partition C, after which I was unable to access the operating system. I reinstalled the operating system partition C. I installed PGP WDE, when I entered in the program, partition D does not appear to be decrypted. Partition D appears in My Computer (0 bytes), in computer management at disk management appear 548 GB RAW. If I double click on it ask me for Format, but i've never click Yes, so the second partition was never touch after the problem.After this I reinstalled twice the OS. Now I have windows 8.1 but stil,but still I have not touch the second partition. I've tried to decrypt the drive with a few tutorials such as(WinPE and put the hard disk as second partition): http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH170574 http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH149478 Give me various errors suchs as: "Could not locate valid BGFS record. Recovey failed! Operation recover disk failed: Error code -11984 item not found" or "Disk 1 is not instrumented by bootguard" and others. I know was my fault. Please give me a solution. P.S: Sorry for my english, I'm not native and please move this topic if it was not posted properly
troygaines
11 years ago Place General Veritas
596Views
1like
0Comments
How can I select tool for Group Wise to Exchange Migration?
Please help me to select any Group Wise to Exchange Migration tool, which collect all the data and convert into PST or exchange file format.
johnshina
11 years ago Place Backup Exec
366Views
0likes
1Comment
HP StoreOnce OST Plug in for NetBackup on Windows/Linux/Solaris & HPUX
There have been several queries on this forum about downloading the HP StoreOnce OST Plug in for NetBackup, which seem either out of date or don't give the actual information, so here is the latest info. An article from Dec 2012 on HP's Support Center HP D2D/B6000 StoreOnce Backup Systems - OST Software Information with Download Details directs you to: http://www.software.hp.com/kiosk But with the incorrect username and password! Please use the following: User Name: STOREONCE_KIOSK Password: STOREONCEAPPS Once there, the following HP StoreOnce OST Plug ins are available for download: HP StoreOnce Catalyst Plugin for Oracle RMAN Windows v1.0 HP StoreOnce Catalyst Plugin for Oracle RMAN Linux v1.0 HP StoreOnce Enterprise Manager V1.2 for Windows HP StoreOnce D2D OST Plugin v1.2 for Windows/Linux/Solaris & HPUX HP OST Plugin v2.0 for NBU for Solaris Sparc v10/HPUX 11.31i HP OST Plugin v2.0.1 for BE for Windows HP OST Plugin v2.1 for NBU for Windows/Linux Release notes and installation guides are usually included with each plug in's tar/zip file. Please ensure that your environment is compatible with the latest Symantec and HP matrices, including the HP Enterprise BURA Solutions (EBS) Compatibility matrix on SPOCK (requires an HP Passport account creating): http://www.hp.com/storage/spock [It will be updated for OST v2.1 shortly!].
rmkenyon
11 years ago Place NetBackup
1.5KViews
2likes
1Comment
7.6.0.1 BMR restore error V-126-8 Cannot find TrueImage date.
Hi I need help about the BMR . Now I can not run "Prepare to Restore". The following message is displayed: The requested operation could not be completed. The server returned code 1. [Error] V-126-8 Cannot find TrueImage date. Please make sure a full backup of this client is available. [Error] V-126-3 'bmrprep' could not complete the requested operation.Please see logs for additional information. [Info] V-126-43 Cleaning up. Please wait... My System Master Server = Windows 2008 x64 R2 Ent. / NBU 7.6.0.1 Client = Windows 2008 x64 R2 Std. / UEFI Mode/ NBU 7.6.0.1 Backup Logs completed "the requested operation was successfully completed(0)" Thanks.
Sattaya
11 years ago Place NetBackup
915Views
0likes
3Comments
Error V-123-49 Operation failed(Status 114) when retrieve a point in time configuration
hi everyone i have a problem with win client restore A error occured when i bmr restore a win client Error V-123-49 Operation failed(Status 114) Here is my context: NBU Master server 7.5 (Suse 11 sp1_x64) NBU client 7.5 (win2008 standard x64) BMR backup client ok bmrd log ------------------------------------------------------- 11/25/13 18:04:57.079 [winStreamHeader.cpp:removeWinStreamHeader()] Found BACKUP_DATA, seek to 101991869142093903 11/25/13 18:04:57.081 [winStreamHeader.cpp:removeWinStreamHeader()] Exiting, line=144, return BMR_SUCCESS 11/25/13 18:04:57.128 [bmrdcommonunix.cpp:PlatformForkCommon()] Entering, newsockfd=17 11/25/13 18:04:57.129 [bmrdcommonunix.cpp:PlatformForkCommon()] Exiting, line=84, return pid=29445 11/25/13 18:04:57.129 [bmrdcommonunix.cpp:PlatformForkCommon()] Exiting, line=84, return pid=0 11/25/13 18:04:57.129 [bmrd.cpp:HandleThisConnection()] entering 11/25/13 18:04:57.129 [bmrd.cpp:HandleThisConnection()] call_fd=17 11/25/13 18:04:57.130 [bmrdcommon.cpp:DoVxssAuthentication()] Entering, line=45, fd=17 11/25/13 18:04:57.131 [bmrdcommon.cpp:DoVxssAuthentication()] Exiting, line=106, return rc=0 11/25/13 18:04:57.170 [bmrdcommon.cpp:AssertCompat()] entering 11/25/13 18:04:57.170 [bmrdcommon.cpp:AssertCompat()] fd=17 11/25/13 18:04:57.170 [bmrdcommon.cpp:AssertCompat()] exiting 11/25/13 18:04:57.170 [bmrd.cpp:HandleImportRequest()] entering 11/25/13 18:04:57.170 [bmrd.cpp:HandleImportRequest()] call_fd=17 11/25/13 18:04:57.187 V-128-906 [ImportCfg.cpp:ImportConfig()] Unable to extract either ./bmrcli.xml or bmrcli.xml file from bundle. Cannot import. 11/25/13 18:04:57.188 [bmrd.cpp:HandleImportRequest()] exiting 11/25/13 18:04:57.188 [bmrd.cpp:HandleThisConnection()] exiting 11/25/13 18:04:57.188 [bmrd.cpp:RetrieveClientConfiguration()] Unable to import configuration from bundle file /usr/openv/netbackup/baremetal/server/data/nc-128.1.100.154.bundle.dat. 11/25/13 18:04:57.188 [bmrd.cpp:RetrieveClientConfiguration()] Exiting, line=2323, return BMR_FAIL 11/25/13 18:04:57.190 [bmrd.cpp:HandleMethodExecute()] exiting 11/25/13 18:04:57.190 [bmrd.cpp:HandleThisConnection()] exiting 11/25/13 18:05:21.141 [logChanges.cpp:LogChangesCheck()] Config file change detected, reloading log objects. 11/25/13 18:05:21.145 [logChanges.cpp:LogChangesCheck()] Config file change detected, reloading log objects.
scropoy
11 years ago Place NetBackup
1.9KViews
0likes
6Comments
The directory or file was not found, or could not be accessed
Hi I am running backup exec on my windows server 2003. every morning the backups fail with the following error message: The job failed with the following error: The directory or file was not found, or could not be accessed." please help.
Tecnophrik
11 years ago Place Backup Exec
460Views
0likes
1Comment
EMM server is not starting we are getting error code 1068
can you please help on this its reflecting to two ips, how to flush the ipson version 6.5 N:\veritas\netbackup\bin>bpclntcmd -server ba5sbak009 host ba5sbak009: ba5sbak009.gar.corp.intel.com at 10.223.52.39 (0x2734df0a) host ba5sbak009: ba5sbak009.gar.corp.intel.com at 192.168.10.84 (0x540aa8c0) aliases: i used the this cmd but no usebpclntcmd -clear_host_cache = Clears the cache, plz help me .
Thirupam
12 years ago Place NetBackup
721Views
4likes
2Comments
Serious Error
Dear, good morning. I would like to make clear in this discussion, the importance that we give the integrity of our data, in particular our emails. We constantly see people everywhere reporting infections on their desktops and applications, but I do not see reporting as contracted. Importance would be a good integrity of our emails because we feed them well (cybercriminals) with new weapons by obtaining data on which they should not. Social networks registered with corporate e-mail, blogs registered with corporate e-mail etc., make each day are more targeted. As security expert, I always make sure that after all always looking for a culprit for a serious infection or destructive, and at the end of everything as it always has to have a fault, this is a security solution, but we learn that , we have to create its own policy of security as well. Attached to this discussion, is a video explaining the step taken by an attacker to collect e-mails and perform intrusion attempts with new weapons all the time are created by these criminals. Remember, a cracker does not use steps "maldados," they create their own weapons and new weapons to attack, so we never have a 100% solution, but if you create a good security policy in yourself, then it will be secured 100%, because a good percentage depends on your security solution, and so another good percentage is up to you forever! I hope you enjoyed. Big hug to everyone.
Solved
Fabiano_Pessoa
12 years ago Place North America
3.1KViews
1like
12Comments
Phrases that scare security professionals
Given the findings of some practices and routines, it is easy to know what the problems are with the security companies. It is your case? The scenes are classic. A child with chocolate smeared shirt says, categorically: "It was not me." Or the phone rings and mother assures you, "There's nothing to worry about." Or a systems administrator who carries a box of tapes back up guarantees: "Within minutes, all information will be retrieved." In some cases, the first words you hear - despite the distance between them and the truth - are enough to tell you everything you need to know. In some cases, the first words you hear - despite the distance between Them and the truth - are enough to tell you everything you need to know. The same applies to the world of information security. The same applies to the world of information security. Some words sound reassuring, but we know they often point out problems of internal security, technical resources or the people and processes involved in the protection systems. Get to know some of the phrases "revealing secrets" that signal the imminence of problems in security. One. One We have a culture of safety We have a culture of safety "No, you do not have" is the immediate response of the professionals. "No, you have not's" is the immediate response of the professionals. Even if only mentally. Even if only mentally. This is the kind of phrase that comes from companies that started with five people - in the traditional family business model - and, as they grew, a snap themselves operating with thousands of people without governance or policies. This is the kind of phrase That comes from companies That started with five people - in the traditional family business model - and, As They grew to snap Themselves Thousands of people operating with or without governance policies. Some exchanged and its "safety culture" are enough to buy a good espresso in a quiet corner allowing look to the horizon and find out how much work lies ahead. Some Exchanged and its "safety culture" are enough to buy a good espresso in a quiet corner Allowing look to the horizon and find out how much work lies ahead. The simple fact is that without support guidelines or feedback mechanisms (feedback), security is defined differently by each and is not verified by anyone. The simple fact is without support guidelines That common mechanisms or feedback (feedback), security is defined differently by each and is not verified by anyone. There are no metrics for compliance with the "culture" and a "safety culture" is hidden by a practice of "do your job". If there are rules, write them down. If there are rules, write down Them. If technology is put into action to implement or monitor the rules, write that down too. If technology is put into action to Implement or monitor the rules, write down That too. If people break the rules, comply with what was agreed. If the rules undermine the legitimacy of the business when completed, change them. 2nd. 2nd. IT security is information security IT security is the security of information Information security is not the same thing in the information technology security. If the term "information security" is used in the same way that "IT security", it invariably means that nobody has taken decisions not primarily security techniques that affect departments - IT, human resources, legal, audit and perhaps others in the organization. Join those who have influence in the departments listed above and decide whether information (not paper documents or equipment) is an asset of the company, such as computers and desks. Decide whether the company authorizes people to do jobs, logical and physical access to information as individuals. Decides Whether the company authorizes people to the jobs, logical and physical access to the information Individuals. Take these policies in group decisions. Take these policies in group decisions. Then maybe there will be more time to decide "how to" manage security - rather than trying to guess ... 3rd. 3rd. This does not apply to the chief This does not apply to the chief Although this is becoming less of an issue in public, occasionally an executive simply refuses to follow security guidelines that he himself approved. Although this is less of an issue Becoming in public, occasionally an executive simply Refuses to follow security guidelines That he himself approved. Unless you are prepared to meticulously document all "escapades" following the model of forensics and then deliver them to the directors or the police (or just quit), be prepared to work around the situation. Most bad apples can be managed by applying the Machiavellian sense of having influence the relationship of the other: they must at least pretend to lead by example, while continuing to do whatever they do behind closed doors. Few will admit it, but many Organizations simply put in the budget and install a DSL line access to "guests" in the halls of top executives and Their Eyes close to anything that is plugged into That line. This is not a desirable solution, but if you still solve these executives sign the documents required by Sarbanes-Oxley, the rest comes from the ability to deny knowledge of security professionals. 4th. 4th. Our department gets information security IT staff Our department gets information security IT staff Titles do not matter. Titles of not matter. A report by a security expert at the IT director is always a security administrator, even if that person has the job of information security officer. The problem is that in the corporate world the word "officer" usually means that professional has the authority to verify and monitor whether all the techniques and processes that control proprietary information are efficient. An IT security administrator is usually involved in designing technical control and therefore can not be "self-audit" and make sure that IT is doing the right thing, particularly if it relates to someone within IT. The security professional with the position of "officer" should always report the same level or higher as the IT director. The security professional with the position of "officer" should always report the same level or higher to the IT director. 5th. 5th. We have a password policy We have a password policy Speaking directly, a document that specifies the size, shape and complexity of a password is a technical standard or procedure, not a policy. Speaking directly, the document that specifies the size, shape and complexity of the password is a technical standard or procedure, not a policy. Politics is a directory for directing business, something like "individuals must be identified uniquely and authenticated priority to have the condition to access the company's assets." Politics is a business directory for directing, something like "Individuals must be authenticated and uniquely Identified priority to have the condition to access the company's assets." Note that this example policy involves "what" to do about people and access, not "how" to construct a sequence of character types. 6th. 6th. Our executives have copies of all passwords Our executives have copies of all passwords Although the idea to make a young student faint, ex ist indeed managers who demand that their direct employees to disclose their individual passwords. Although the idea to make the faint young student, ex ist indeed managers who demand That Their direct employees to Disclose Their individual passwords. The explanation for this is always: "What if someone is fired or sick? How could we find your documents?." When this happens, the only effective strategy is to tell anyone who asks such a thing: "If you do, then you are a suspect in any negative situation that arises. When this happens, the only effective strategy is to tell anyone who ASKs such a thing: " You'll never be Able to fire anybody because you will Also be a suspect. "Or you can always summarize it all in a simple:" Grow friend. " 7th. 7th. The brand is our standard I have nothing against the major hardware vendors in the market, but when the personal shopping company says: "Our standard is Dell" (or any other brand), what they are really saying is: "We play our standards security out the window in exchange for discounts and now we buy whatever the vendor offers. " I have nothing against the major hardware vendors in the market, but When the personal shopping company says: "Our standard is Dell" (or any other brand), What They are really saying is: "We play our security standards out the window in exchange for discounts and now we buy whatever the vendor offers. "It's the equivalent of shopping that her great-aunt in a store with inflated prices, getting happy because" a product is discounted 75%. " It's the equivalent of shopping That her great-aunt in the store with inflated prices, getting happy because "the product is discounted 75%." The point is, that both her great-aunt when IT people in the real world have other decisions to make and are commodity PCs. The point is, that her great-aunt ambos When IT people in the real world have other Decisions to make and are commodity PCs are all sure to choose the product from a vendor and maintain applications with it for a while. It's all right to choose the product from the vendor and Maintain applications with it for a while. But a manufacturer is not a technical standard and there is a problem in that mix if anyone does their homework. But the manufacturer is not a technical standard and there is a problem in That mix if anyone does Their homework. When a manufacturer makes changes in line or software product - especially when that part of an equipment manufacturer and network security such as Cisco Systems - it is important to have clearly defined functional requirements to assess whether the products still work as desired. When the customers not know what They want, any bargain Seems to be what you need. 8th. 8th. Hey, where did that come from? It is conceivable that those highly technical users should organize their own equipment as well as support them. On the other hand, this means that the area of IT and support personnel were knocked out by hardware manufacturers that provide only an 0800 number that never works. Security policies must be present everywhere, including the bathrooms attached to the wall behind the toilet paper of an organization. Security policy in the company can be exposed Also next to the bathroom towels. The important thing is to be clear and known to all. Solving this problem is a fundamental respect. Solving this problem is a fundamental respect. Start with the basic governance and making it clear that there are rules, with much effort and communication, this will at least make the "safety culture" a settled matter. 9th. 9th. We ship to the firewall rules ... Most network administrators cowers with the words mentioned above. Still, many will still send free email with a copy of the firewall rules. Worse, they have an OEM or a freelance consultant who set up the firewall for them and retain the single copy of the rules. These rules, if they present complexity, provide a detailed map of the security scheme of the company, with important information about the identity of internal networks and services and how to make them a target. No serious security professional would date a copy of the firewall rules of someone without a specific requirement to do so. A competent auditor of information systems certificate or other auditor will review firewall rules directly into the system administrator and can not take. The Competent auditor of information systems certificate or other auditor will review firewall rules Directly into the system administrator and can not take. If you see a copy of your corporate firewall rules put in an audit report, especially an audience, get ready to redo the design of IP ... and call their lawyers. Their lawyers and call.
Solved
Fabiano_Pessoa
12 years ago Place North America
1.3KViews
2likes
6Comments