Backup size of Windows Server 2008 R2
Hello,
I'm not writing about a problem as such but about a curiosity.
I have several Windows Server 2008 R2 clients in my NetBackup domain and recently I noticed that the backup footprint of the Windows Server 2008 R2's are quite a bit larger than the Windows Server 2003 clients.
I installed a new Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2003 and a Ubuntu linux server. Joined them as backup clients and put them in a policy with a retention of 2 full and 6 Diff. Incr. backups.
The three OS'es take up the following space:
OS: | Space in GB: |
---|---|
Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS | 5.5 |
Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard SP1 | 76 |
Windows Server 2003 Standard x64 SP2 | 25 |
I was chocked to see this difference so I set the 2008 R2 server up with the built in Windows Server Backup just to compare.
Windows Server Backup does the same job with 16.75 GB. How can that be ?
Windows 2008 has a far bigger System State - or Shadow Copy Components as it is called now - and therin lies the clue.
2008 usually has Shadow Copies set up by default - so the System Volume Information folder holds shadow copies of the system, restore points etc. etc. etc.
Right click on your C drive and select Properties - go to the Shadow Copies tab and it will show you how much is being used and how many Shadow Copies it has
Hope this helps