GUP Multiple - Fonctionnement
Bonjour, Je rencontre des problèmes concernant la mise à jour des déifinitons antivirus des postes clients. Mon architecture : 1 site accueillant 1 serveur SEPM, 15 sites distants téléchargeant les mise à jour sur le serveur. QOS avec priorité basse pour SYMANTEC (sinon le réseau sature lors des téléchargements). Environ 400 clients. Je souhaiterai mettre en place des GUP Mutliples, pouvez vous éclaircir les points suivants : 1 - Sur site je ne dispose pas de serveur ou de postes dédiés. Je compte utilisé un poste client avec la config suivante : Windows7pro X64, 500Go, 4Go de RAM. Cela peut-il convenir ? 2 - Cela va t-il demander beaucoup de ressources ou d'espace disque au postes qui sera transformer en GUP. 3 - Lors de GUP multiples comment réagissent les clients pour se connecter au GUP ? Il se connecte au premier qui réponds ? Ou est-il possible pour un sous-réseau de spécifier un GUP ? Car je ne souhaiterai pas que les clients du SITE A télécharge sur le GUP du SITE B, par exemple, sauf en cas de défaillance du GUP du SITE A. Merci d'avance de votre aide. :)657Views0likes1CommentPhisihing calls to Symantec Customers
This is an email I sent to a couple people listed under the Symantec Media contacts as there are is general Corporate contact information anywhere on the website (obivously by design). I putting this up both as a warning to other Symantec customers and also as I doubt it has reached the appropriate department in Symantec in email form. I’m receiving calls from a woman with a British accent, and a blocked phone number, claiming to be from Symantec. She knows I am a current customer, and proceeds to ask me questions regarding our current IT infrastructure. I’m going to assume this person does not work for Symantec, and the fact that they apparently have a list of your customers and are trying to get information on their current IT infrastructure should be of some concern as their intentions are unknown.1.1KViews1like8CommentsHow to block Babylon, 7Pic and Sweetimm
I am having a real struggle in stopping Babylon, 7Picuploader and some other crap called Trust (sweetimm) ending up on my XP based desktop. Sweetimm is interesting, it blows kisses at me! I have the latest version of Norton Interenet Security and am a little pissed off that it does not pick up these intrusions. Previous versions of the software allowed me to block this junk manually but this latest version doesn't. I can disable theNorton Firewall and use the Microsoft one which will work but it is not exactly a good solution. I have removed all files manually frommy PCthat relate to these programms, including all the hidden files but this rubbish still gets back and installs. There must be a way that Norton IS can be configured to stop these intrusions?398Views0likes1Commentdisable credentials owa's archive explorer
I'd love to skip authentication when a logged on owa user wants to use its archive explorer. Now it's asking for fqdn credentials. Not all users know that syntax so they fail with 401 warnings. If you were to log on as user@domain it works well. Since the user is already authenticated at its owa session how could I be able to use that as well for archive explorer? (Opening archives works well without extra authentication.) EV 9.02. Exchange all in one. (front and back iis etc etc) 2003 sp2. I thought I'd had to fiddle around with iis on exchange (EnterPriseVaultProxy) Don't know what exactly. Is this article already tackled in EV9? http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH50593Or am I still "suffering" from this?Solved629Views0likes2CommentsMy product is wrongfully labeled as a threat by Norton.
Hi, My product is wrongfully labeled as a threat by Norton and a .dll file is deleted by Norton and thus the product does not function correct. It is the 'File Insight service that warns about this. See image below. I would like to know how my company can become 'whitelisted' or any other way for us to avoid this scenario? Appologize if this was posted in the wrong forum...462Views0likes2Comments