Current 2010 environment is backing up about 100 servers compressed down into about 12 jobs a day. I can't do that with 2012's server centric view. Spun up a vm to test it out I have since deleted it. I can't see how in it's current form it can be anywhere as easy to manage all my backups as it is now in 2010. I want some of the new features but until I can as easily manage all my servers like being able to bundle them up into single jobs through a GUI and not rely on CLI (don't see how that is a solution considering how easy it is to re-order servers in a job through the gui now or add a new server to an existing multiserver job), I will be staying put.
Have been using Backupexec for I don't know how long just checked I still have a version 9 install in production at a remote site. Can't understand why such a drastic change in the way the product now handles backups. If you didn't have to many servers to backup I can see it not being too bad but the more you are trying to backup the worse it looks.