Forum Discussion
Liam_Finn1
15 years agoLevel 6
Speaking from an SQL side. Unless your SQL servers are very busy or under powered there will be some overhead having the databases split between two servers but I don't see it being that much of an issue. Just ensure that there is good connection speed between the servers and that the servers are fast with enough memory I think you should be fine
The other option is to have two storage groups one to cover the databases on SQL1 and the other to cover the databases on SQL2. This will decrease the SIS obtained because you can only do SIS on vaults in the same Storage Group.
I think option one should be OK
The other option is to have two storage groups one to cover the databases on SQL1 and the other to cover the databases on SQL2. This will decrease the SIS obtained because you can only do SIS on vaults in the same Storage Group.
I think option one should be OK
Related Content
- 12 years ago
- 13 years ago
- 12 years ago