NDMP_XDR_DECODE_ERR
I have a Solaris 10 master/media server running 7.0.1and a Solaris 10media server (7.0.1) with a direct connected C4 Tape library. . . a;sldkfja;sldfj I am trying to backup a NetApp partition to the aforementioned C4 Tape Library using an NDMP policy. Getting the following: Dec 6, 2011 7:40:01 AM - estimated 0 kbytes needed Dec 6, 2011 7:40:02 AM - started process bpbrm (pid=20725) Dec 6, 2011 7:40:02 AM - connecting Dec 6, 2011 7:40:02 AM - connected; connect time: 0:00:00 Dec 6, 2011 7:40:04 AM - mounting X109L2 Dec 6, 2011 7:40:47 AM - mounted X109L2; mount time: 0:00:43 Dec 6, 2011 7:40:47 AM - positioning X109L2 to file 1 Dec 6, 2011 7:40:54 AM - positioned X109L2; position time: 0:00:07 Dec 6, 2011 7:40:54 AM - begin writing Dec 6, 2011 10:39:10 AM - Error ndmpagent (pid=20730) connection 0x100301ca0 ndmp_message_process_one_failed, status = NDMP_XDR_DECODE_ERR Dec 6, 2011 10:39:10 AM - Error ndmpagent (pid=20730) eof is set - connection 0x100301ca0 Dec 6, 2011 10:39:10 AM - Error ndmpagent (pid=20730) NDMP backup failed, path = /vol/v2011_3/ Dec 6, 2011 10:39:10 AM - Error ndmpagent (pid=20730) ndmp_data_get_state_failed, status = 12 (NDMP_EOF_ERR) Dec 6, 2011 10:40:48 AM - end writing; write time: 2:59:54 NDMP backup failure (99) Does anyone have any experience with this? Ever seen this? Any help would be greatly appreciated. rickSolved5.2KViews1like4CommentsSerious Error
Dear, good morning. I would like to make clear in this discussion, the importance that we give the integrity of our data, in particular our emails. We constantly see people everywhere reporting infections on their desktops and applications, but I do not see reporting as contracted. Importance would be a good integrity of our emails because we feed them well (cybercriminals) with new weapons by obtaining data on which they should not. Social networks registered with corporate e-mail, blogs registered with corporate e-mail etc., make each day are more targeted. As security expert, I always make sure that after all always looking for a culprit for a serious infection or destructive, and at the end of everything as it always has to have a fault, this is a security solution, but we learn that , we have to create its own policy of security as well. Attached to this discussion, is a video explaining the step taken by an attacker to collect e-mails and perform intrusion attempts with new weapons all the time are created by these criminals. Remember, a cracker does not use steps "maldados," they create their own weapons and new weapons to attack, so we never have a 100% solution, but if you create a good security policy in yourself, then it will be secured 100%, because a good percentage depends on your security solution, and so another good percentage is up to you forever! I hope you enjoyed. Big hug to everyone.Solved3.1KViews1like12CommentsAdd new tape library
I have a master server version 7.0.1 running on a Solaris 10 boxwith a direct connected SL48 tape library attached that performs all of our local backups. I would like to attach a C4 library to one of the Solaris clients in another building to do myNetApp filer backups. The C4 library is attached to the client and I can see the library and the drives from the OS. What process do I need to perform to allow this server to do the filer backups.If there is a library attached to it, does it need to have a mediaserver installed on it? Do I need to install the master on it as well? Where do I define the robot and drives? From the original master server? Do Ineed to create anything from the new server side console? I've read I need to update the bp.confs on both sides. With what?Please, if any one has any direction for me, I'd appreciate it. thanks, rickSolved2.9KViews1like20CommentsData management in the cloud gives government an edge
We’ve had a change in leadership in Washington D.C. but the challenges for data management are more prescient than ever. Data is growing at an exponential rate not just in the private sector but also within the government.2.7KViews2likes0Commentsjob status - complete with exceptions
there are some backup jobs run in Backup Exec 2012 , only two full backup jobs complete with exceptions in the lastest backup task. The credential of this backup job test result was failed. we haven't change any password or credential of this job. Exceptions Details: can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/oracle/app/grid/product/11.2.0/log/posdb1/srvm/eonsd_0.log.lck - skiped. can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/var/run/iscsid.pid - skiped. can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/var/run/multipathd.pid - skiped. can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/var/run/atd.pid - skiped. can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/var/run/sm-client.pid - skiped. can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/var/run/sendmail.pid - skiped. can't open this item \\posdb1\[ROOT]/var/run/iscsiuio.pid - skiped.Solved2.4KViews1like8CommentsStatus 58 Can't connect to client
I have a Solaris 10 master and media server, a Solaris 10 media server with a C4 library direct connected. I am trying to do an NDMP backup from a Netapp filer on the same network. So, this is considered a remote NDMP backup. When I attempt to do a backup, I get the followingin the Admin Console on the master server: Error bpbrm (pid=21078) cannot connect to filer3, Operation now in progress (150) can't connect to client (58). There is no bpbrm messages on the master but on the media server, the bpbrm log contains: job_disconnect: Disconnected ConnectionCache::connectAndCache: Acquiring new connection for host alabama, query type 1 vnet_pbxConnect: pbxConnectEx Succeeded logconnections: BPDBM CONNECT FROM 138.109.248.35.43190 TO 138.109.250.180.1556 fd = 5 db_end: Need to collect reply verify_client: bpbrm.c.34470: start_bpcd_stat failed: 58 58 0x0000003a bpbrm main: bpbrm.c.2782: verify_client failed: 58 58 0x0000003a bpbrm kill_child_process: start OpenMailPipe: /usr/ucb/mail... bpbrm Exit: client backup EXIT STATUS 58: can't connect to client Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.Solved2.3KViews0likes5CommentsAdding a media server to remote offices
p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; } Hi Everyone! I was hoping to get some feed back on and issue I am currently tasked with. We are currently using Netbackup 6.5.5 in our head office with about 100 servers with DSU and tape library. We also have 7 remote offices that are using an older backup exec version and pushing their SDLT 320 tapes to their storage limit. Option 1: Upgrade to a newer version of backup exec and purchase new LTO 3 or 4 tape drivers. Option 2: Purchase the 7 LTO 3 or 4 tapes drives and install a media server in each of the 7 sites and run the policies from head office. I like option number 2 so that we can eventually take had advantage of puredisk and technologies like that but at this time I am strapped for time and also have a slow wan link between a few sites. So my questions are: 1.Has anyone done this and will I need a second master server to handle the load. 2. Will I need to pay for a full licence for each media server. I understand that there are contracts or licences to pay for per TB that you backup and have access to everything but we are federal government and don't seem to have that option. Thanks a bunch!Solved2.2KViews1like15CommentsUpgrading OpenSSL in NetBackup
Hello, I'm having a security issue with NetBackup. Basically I need to upgrade the installed version of OpenSSL that came with NetBackup. If the OpenSSL is not effected by the current and past vulnerabilities then I need to see document from Symantec. Theses are the files I need to upgrade /usr/openv/pdde/pdopensource/bin/.bin/openssl /usr/openv/pdde/pdopensource/bin/openssl OpenSSL 0.9.8y This is the version I need to be up to date. OpenSSL 0.9.8za OpenSSL 1.0.0m OpenSSL 1.0.1h I have had this issue before. Below is a link to by earlier post asking this question. http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/openssl-use-netbackup-7102 I have had this same issue with Java before. This the Symantec fix http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH148257 This fix is to use the OpenSSL that the OS is using. Is there a way to do this for SSL? I have opened a ticket with support and they don't know anything. They are not able to help me. Can someone help me secure my sever.Solved1.8KViews0likes9Comments