cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

doubt about ora_priv res in sfrac

sam321
Level 4

i m building sfrac 

following are steps i used to add ora_priv resourse to my configuration

 

 

-bash-3.00# haconf -makerw
-bash-3.00# hares -add ora_priv PrivNIC cvm
VCS NOTICE V-16-1-10242 Resource added. Enabled attribute must be set before agent monitors
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Critical 0
-bash-3.00# hares -local ora_priv Device
-bash-3.00# hares -local ora_priv Address
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Device -add bge2 0 -sys TEST1
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Device -add bge3 1 -sys TEST1
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Address 192.168.10.3 -sys TEST1
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Device -add bge2 0 -sys TEST2
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Device -add bge3 1 -sys TEST2
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Address 192.168.10.5 -sys TEST2
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv NetMask 255.255.255.0
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Enabled 1
-bash-3.00# haconf -dump -makero
 
 
bge2 and bge3 are my llt interfaces
after the configuration why it assigned the vip to one of llt interfaces???????????
am i going wron somewhere in concept
 
 
bge0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
        inet 192.168.1.3 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
        ether 0:3:ba:c0:92:7d
bge2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.2.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
        ether 0:3:ba:c0:92:7f
bge2:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
        inet 192.168.10.5 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255
bge3: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4
        inet 192.168.3.2 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255
        ether 0:3:ba:c0:92:80
 
 
-bash-3.00# more /etc/hosts
#
# Internet host table
#
::1     localhost
127.0.0.1       localhost
192.168.1.3     TEST2   loghost
192.168.1.2     TEST1
192.168.2.1     TEST1-priv
192.168.2.2     TEST2-priv
192.168.10.3    TEST1-vip
192.168.10.5    TEST2-vip
 
i have not yet plumbed the interface where i want the vip to get assigned.Is it making the wron assignment of IP to one of llt interfaces as vip
Help me out guys
 
 
Regards
Kuldeep
 
 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Gaurav_S
Moderator
Moderator
   VIP    Certified

I believe that should't really matter, however there are considerations to it depending on how is connectivity made. If your servers are nearby & connected LLT are cross cables, would be simple /recommended to keep them in same network, however if server's lie little apart & you are using switches / vlans in between, it may happen that networks are different however it should still be able to ping.

In short, i would say, recommended would be same network..

Gaurav

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4

Gaurav_S
Moderator
Moderator
   VIP    Certified

Hi Kuldeep,

you are defining bge2 & bge3 only as the interfaces while configuration, thats why it is taking that interface ..

-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Device -add bge2 0 -sys TEST1
-bash-3.00# hares -modify ora_priv Device -add bge3 1 -sys TEST1
 
PrivNIC resource would be needed to configure CRS IPs, & that by design happens on LLT interfaces only, see abstract below from SFRAC admin guide:
 
 
Configure Oracle private IP addresses under VCS PrivNIC or MultiPrivNIC to protect against link failures. This requires you to configure CRS private IP addresses and UDP cache fusion IP addresses on LLT interconnects.
 
 
G

Gaurav_S
Moderator
Moderator
   VIP    Certified

Here is the reference section from guide, its under best practices:

 

https://sort.symantec.com/public/documents/sf/5.0MP3/solaris/html/sfrac_admin/ch02s03.htm

 

 

G

sam321
Level 4

one more thing Gaurav

whether both physical and virtual Ips assigned on bge2 on both nodes should be on same network???

in my case they are on diff network

Gaurav_S
Moderator
Moderator
   VIP    Certified

I believe that should't really matter, however there are considerations to it depending on how is connectivity made. If your servers are nearby & connected LLT are cross cables, would be simple /recommended to keep them in same network, however if server's lie little apart & you are using switches / vlans in between, it may happen that networks are different however it should still be able to ping.

In short, i would say, recommended would be same network..

Gaurav