cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Duplication performance poor

ShelleyK
Level 4

Our backup server is NBU Enterprise Server, 7.5.0.7 running on OEL 5.10 (x86), on a Dell R620 server and Dell PVTL 2000 (2 x LTO5 drives), each drive connected via 6Gps SAS interface to NBU server. 

We backup several items to disk, among them two Exchange 2010 servers. We need the GRT option as we need to recover items at a message level. The disk is an iSCSI volume, presented rw to the OS as mount point /nfsbackup (/dev/mapper/idatap1 on /nfsbackup type ext4 (rw,_netdev)).

The issue I am running into is what I consider to be poor performance during duplication from disk to tape. We can't get the images off disk fast enough (it's a 1.5TB volume) to make room for the next images. The current situation is a great example. They are both Exchange 2010 GRT images, one from each server. 

Job #1: Started 12/02/2014 20:30:44; 55% done (217823232KB of 395169442KB done), est throughput: 4731KB/sec

Job #2: Started 12/03/2014 01:08:54; 54% done (202821632KB of 374121233KB done), est throughput: 6889KB/sec

Interfaces

NBU server: eth1, eth2 on 1Gbps (not bonded) interfaces to storage network; jumbo frames enabled

iSCSI storage: multipathed, 2 interfaces @ 1Gbps each, jumbo frames enabled

I'm monitoring the NBU server interface with Solarwinds, and I'm getting maybe 80MB/s (combined), barely breaking 8% utilization. Now, utilization does peak from time to time (see image at end) but then it always settles down to this level.

Storage Unit: BasicDisk

Maximum concurrent jobs: 12

Fragment size: default (524288 MB is greyed out)

High water mark 70% / Low water mark 30%

Enable Temporary Staging Area checked: Staging Schedule at Frequency of 12 hours, no exclusions or Start Window specified

Other NBU touchfiles

NET_BUFFER_SZ: 262144

NET_BUFFER_SZ_REST: 262144

STAGING_JOB_KB_LIMIT: 157286400

SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS: 262144

SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS_DISK: 1048576

NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS: 256

NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_DISK: 512

Performance graphic

md3000i_small.png

 

Thanks for any insight and help in advance,
Michelle

 

 

20 REPLIES 20

ShelleyK
Level 4

Thank you Marianne!