cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Tape Usage

ojmagg
Level 4
We upgraded from 5.1 mp 6 to 6.5 a few months back.  The process it's self went smooth, however, we are still having some issues...
 
We seem to be using a few extra tapes per day...one extra (for a total of 2) for our catalog.  When we were on 5.1, we only sent 1 off-site.  Then, after weekend, we are sending off 15 tapes.  Again, on 5.1 we used to only send off 10 after a weekend...
 
Anyone else notice a change in tape usage after moving to 6.5?
7 REPLIES 7

scored_well2
Level 4
Certified
Have you checked your backup policies for any changes? For example, jobs running more than once during a window, software compression turned on? I have seen upgrades happen where the 5.1 policy came out the other side of the upgrade to 6.0 with different settings.  I have not tried an upgrade to 6.5 though.


Message Edited by Simon Caudwell on 01-04-2008 07:01 AM

Stumpr2
Level 6


ojmagg wrote:
We upgraded from 5.1 mp 6 to 6.5 a few months back. 

a few months back? That doesn't give much to compare. If the images from a few months back still exist then you can compare size using
bpimagelist -U -client <clientname> -d MM/DD/YY -e MM/DD/YY
 
compare from a month before then run it again for the month of December
bpimagelist -U -client <clientname> -d 12/01/07 -e 12/31/07
 
 

ojmagg
Level 4
Thanks for the replies!
 
I've been over the setting...they appear to be same as when we were on 5.1...
 
Here's the output from bpimagelist -U -client <client> -d MM/DD/YY -e MM/DD/YY:
 
Backed Up         Expires       Files       KB  C  Sched Type   Policy
----------------  ---------- -------- --------  -  ------------ ------------
01/02/2008 03:00  INFINITY     261043 42429911  N  Full Backup  Linux 
10/02/2007 03:01  INFINITY     240671 40518658  N  Full Backup  Linux
09/02/2007 03:02  INFINITY     240811 71663008  N  Full Backup  Linux
08/02/2007 03:20  INFINITY     223070 93752005  N  Full Backup  Linux
07/02/2007 03:22  INFINITY     221678 97044131  N  Full Backup  Linux
06/04/2007 08:56  INFINITY     223228 94675249  N  Full Backup  Linux
05/02/2007 03:00  INFINITY     222830 98771890  N  Full Backup  Linux
04/02/2007 03:10  INFINITY     221117 95262636  N  Full Backup  Linux
03/02/2007 03:03  INFINITY     218702 90555715  N  Full Backup  Linux
02/02/2007 03:17  INFINITY     216826 87465102  N  Full Backup  Linux
01/02/2007 03:00  INFINITY     210022 37068399  N  Full Backup  Linux
 
Looks like a 2 gig swing...but, that appears normal, given past performance...any other thoughts?
 

Stumpr2
Level 6
Any new retention levels or media servers?

ojmagg
Level 4
Nope...fyi...just 1 media/master...

Rakesh_Khandelw
Level 6
With 5.1 catalog backup usese/overwrites/rotates the same set of tapes, where as with 6.0/6.x you may be writing to different tapes for catalog backups (with 6.0/6.x recommended way of perfoming catalog backup is online/hot backup, which is policy based). Look into your catalog backup policy and schedule attributes.

Also, see if you have backups going to more volume pools.

TerryD2
Level 3
We called Symantec again to ask about this problem.  This time we got a new tech who told me this was a known issue that started in 6.0.  It is a bug that apparently was not corrected in 6.5.  The problem is that when the robot performs a tape cleaning the NetBackup TapeAlert flag does not get reset properly.  This causes a second tape to be used when it shouldn't.
 
Here is the solution:
 
To clear the TapeAlert Flag, run /usr//openv/volmgr/bin/tpclean -M <drive_name> one drive at a time for each tape drive.
 
This worked for us.  Our catalog backup is now back to one tape.