10-15-2012 06:54 AM
All,
I tried configure BLIB with NetBackup 7.5.0.3, vSphere 5, vmware hardware version 8 (vmx-08) with VMFS 5. Technically BLIB should backup less data in Incremental backup but its reverse in this case. I did configure total of 20 Servers in two different policies one with BLIB enable and other is regular and below are the stats for 5 consecutive incremental backups
BLIB VMWare Incr:- 205 GB
Regular VMWare Incr:- 162 GB
Need your suggestion which to go with for VMX-08 VMs. BLIB or Regular ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-15-2012 02:45 PM
From a previous post.... https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/netbackup-75-vmware-50-making-full-backups-instead-di...
10-15-2012 02:45 PM
From a previous post.... https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/netbackup-75-vmware-50-making-full-backups-instead-di...
10-15-2012 09:30 PM
Technically BLIB should backup less data in Incremental backup - why do you think so?
I think it depends on how applications place data and hwo they change data on disk. BLIB backup takes data on block basis, so BLIB takes unchanged data in same block where changed file resides. Incremental backup takes only changed files.
I think it is possible that BLIB backup become lager than incrementals.
BTW, what Stuart point out is very important. If you have never do this, do it first.
10-15-2012 09:40 PM
Thaks Stuart.
Its not taking all diffs as FULL backup but comparative little extra size than regular incrementals.
I have a project to setup backup for 900 VMs. I check with vmware team and they check that ctk are created after the 1st snapshot.
There are no snapshot resides for VMs and shutdown 20VMs will need a change and all ...
10-15-2012 09:43 PM
Thanks Yasuhisa.
Looks like VMFS 5 has 1mb block size and that may be the reason of larger incremental backups. But here I got an advantage that with BLIB i can restore entire VMs from Incremental as well.
I will see if I can get things done suggested by Stuart.