05-20-2008 06:24 AM
12-27-2010 05:33 AM
I 100% agree with this. Why would anyone think that it would be smart to limit backup jobs to 1 day? What a royal pain!
12-27-2010 05:52 AM
I created a change, or enhancement request here:
https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/idea/be-enhancement-time-window
Please go - and vote for it.
12-27-2010 09:06 AM
...I have jobs that have run for longer than 24 hours and they never stopped.
Are you sure you haven't activated the feature that will stop the job after a certain period of time if it hasn't completed?
12-27-2010 09:18 AM
In my environment, I have 5 jobs, all scheduled to run at the same time, writing to different drives/libraries. They are all created through 1 of 2 Policies (Different Selection Lists). They are all "stacked" like this, so that when 1 job finishes, the next will immediately start.
Once the "window" is closed, any job that is still running, will remain running and complete successfully. However, any jobs in the que will fail to start, as the backup window has now closed.
Because I can't change the start window for an individual selection list (job), without changing all of the jobs created from that policy, it is very painful to work around this limitation.
EDIT: In my case, I'm running BE 2010
12-28-2010 01:16 AM
Ok, the time window does not mean that the job has to finish in that time. A job can continue to run for more than 24 hours. This window just defines the start time for a job.
This time window is useful in cases where a job does not trigger because of device unavaialbility, in those cases do we want to wait for more than 24 hours?
Thanks
12-28-2010 10:15 AM
While not as elegant as policies, you can stack jobs the old fashioned way
Create a BEMCMD job to run the second through ??? job
In the first job, set the job to run the second as a POST command, in the second, set the third to run as a POST command etc.