09-29-2010 09:32 AM
Hy, can I use GRT feature in full exchange restore using tapes backup?
I have backup exec 2010 r2 installed and I did a full backup from exchange 2003 (two storage group).
I need to restore some particular mailbox or individual messages.
What is the best strategy using tapes backup? I can not use B2D!!
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-22-2010 07:28 AM
If you create full, differential, or incremental backups, GRT-enabled jobs have the following restrictions:
1) The full, differential, and incremental job templates must be part of a policy.
2) The destination device must be a backup-to-disk folder.
3) The backup sets from the full, differential, and incremental jobs must be on the same volume.
You cannot restore individual mailboxes and messages if incremental or differential backup method was used and the destination was a tape device.
09-29-2010 09:53 AM
can I use GRT feature in full exchange restore using tapes backup?
For that i think it has to be backed up by using GRT.
need to restore some particular mailbox or individual messages.
For this GRT is the choice..
09-29-2010 10:35 AM
For a small environment Daily Full backup with incremental online backups at midday will do the job for you.
In large environments weekly full backups, and incremental backups taking most frequently in a day will be a better option while considering log file growth.
More Backup strategies you can find in BE 2010 admin guide...
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH77887
Best practices for backing Exchange 2003 better explained in the below mentioned document..
http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO21796
09-29-2010 10:57 AM
The beadmin manual says (page 314)
You cannot restore individual mailboxes and messages if both of the following conditions exist:
■ The incremental or the differential
backup method was used.
■ The destination was a tape device.
So If I'm doing tape backup I can not restore individual mailboxes and messages, is that correct????
09-29-2010 09:26 PM
09-29-2010 09:55 PM
Try these steps
The following best practices are for backing up Exchange 2003 individual mailboxes and public folders if you cannot use Granular Recovery Technology (GRT):
The following best practices are for recovering data for all versions of Exchange Information Store:
The following best practices are for restoring data for Exchange Server 2000 or later:
The following best practices are for restoring individual mailboxes and public folders for Exchange 2000/2003:
The following are best practices to plan for disaster recovery of an Exchange Server:
|
10-04-2010 11:59 AM
I analyzed my environment and I don't have enough space on source servers for full restore with tape backup modality so I thought the following configuration:
First, the most type of restorations are of individual messages.
Strategy
-Do a B2D full backup weekly and incremental backup Daily on SAN storage (retention: 6 days). I don't have enought storage space for that folder.
-Do a weekly backup to tape of B2D folder ( retention: 28 days).
What do you think?
Thanks
10-13-2010 03:52 AM
According to your storage limitations, this configuration will be the better one.
Plan your retensions carefully.
According to your strategy at any point you will have One week full and incrementals on your B2D folder and 4 weeks Full and Incrementals on your tape.
10-22-2010 06:28 AM
Hy people, I take again that project.
I'm doing some testings and I can't use GRT on incremental jobs.
Results
GRT complete backup on B2D is OK.
GRT incremental backup on B2D doesn't work to me (is that supported?)
Doubts
GRT complete backup on tape isn't supported
GRT incrementa backup on tape isn't supported
Thanks
10-22-2010 07:10 AM
I do not belive GRT will work on direct to tape jobs.
For the Incremental B2D2T jobs it will work, but the Exchange job has to be part of a policy. So if you currently have a job for a full backup and a job for an incremental backup, it will not work. You will need to create a Policy job that has the full and incremental job settings.
10-22-2010 07:28 AM
If you create full, differential, or incremental backups, GRT-enabled jobs have the following restrictions:
1) The full, differential, and incremental job templates must be part of a policy.
2) The destination device must be a backup-to-disk folder.
3) The backup sets from the full, differential, and incremental jobs must be on the same volume.
You cannot restore individual mailboxes and messages if incremental or differential backup method was used and the destination was a tape device.
10-22-2010 08:25 AM
I've just configured a policy with:
-one full complete exchange template to a b2d folder
-one incremental exchange template to the same b2d folder
-one selection list with a test information store with 1 mailbox
First I ran the full exchange job and then I did some changes on the mailbox (send and receive one mail) and then I ran the incremental job but the backup set doens't contain data.
I attached some images of that process.
Thanks
10-22-2010 12:06 PM
I found the problem. The media set was an incorrect overwrite configuration so the full backup was been overwriting so the incremental failed.
Thanks for yours help.
10-22-2010 12:38 PM
I'm coming in a little late to this, but I haven't see an answer to your question
"can I use GRT feature in full exchange restore using tapes backup?"
The answer is "you should NOT use GRT for disaster recover, only Stores backups", since GRT completely bypasses single instance storage
That is: if you sent a 10MB attachment to 10 users, Exchange stores it as a single attachment with 10 pointers.
But if you restore via GRT you would have 10 10MB attachents, a difference of +9MB of storage required
Multiply by many emails and (possibly) larger attachments and you can see where GRT restores should not be used in DR situations
(You can use a GRT enabled tape, just don't restore all the mailboxes individually)