02-12-2007 08:11 AM
02-12-2007 02:56 PM
06-04-2007 12:34 AM
06-04-2007 07:35 AM
06-04-2007 10:38 AM
06-04-2007 11:05 AM
06-04-2007 11:42 AM
06-04-2007 12:10 PM
Issac,
What Ken states is correct, and it should work as he states. Unfortunately, there is a defect in 11.d where the supersede rule is not working as designed and the job which should be superseded is still being run. The only workaround at the moment is manually edit the schedule and not use the supersede rule.
Engineering is aware of the issue, and there has been a tech note written, and it should be published in the very near future.
For the time being, please manually set your backup schedule.
06-04-2007 12:29 PM
08-02-2007 01:16 PM
08-03-2007 12:03 AM
08-03-2007 10:29 AM
08-05-2007 11:49 PM
08-09-2007 06:07 PM
08-09-2007 11:05 PM
08-11-2007 08:28 AM
Message Edited by David Bond on 08-11-200708:29 AM
08-11-2007 01:11 PM
10-05-2007 01:08 PM
10-05-2007 02:17 PM
11-04-2007 05:58 PM