12-02-2013 07:31 AM
Environment: Windows Server 2008 R2, EV 10.0.4.1189 Outlook 2007 SP3 w/EV Outlook add-in 10.0.4.1189
Really excited about PST migration improvements in EV10 SP4. I did a bunch of testing migrating some small PST files located on a DFS network share. Everthing went smoothly and emails were copied to a folder in my Outlook client. I rolled this out a few weeks ago to all other clients. I provisioned the same PST Migation policy that I used for testing to the users and I can't get the files to migrate. I have the PST Locator, PST Collector Task, and PST Migrator tasks running and scheduled to work during business hours. I've run the provisioning task to enable all the clients. My initial thought was that the clients were running an older outlook EV add-in. So I upgraded them to the latest (10.0.4) plugg-in. Could it be the PST file size? I tested on files that were only a few Mb. The files I'm attempting to migrate are 10-12 Gb. Does the Migrator task have a problem with such large PST files? When I refresh 'Files' in 'Store Management' it shows "Ready to copy" and does not change.
Thoughts or suggestions are appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-03-2013 06:21 AM
Well...
12-02-2013 07:37 AM
Failure sure that PSTs on DFS shares won't migrate. The Directory or Migrator Server processes can't work out 'where' the PST file is really stored, hence can't do anything.
12-02-2013 07:44 AM
So are the pst file which are migrating via server driven migration stuck in Ready to copy state or even the client driven migration Pst show the status as Ready to copy ?
Did the migration of Small PSt file went Fine ?
12-02-2013 07:45 AM
In testing the server driven migration from the DFS worked great. The user simply needs full access to the file on the DFS. The feature that I was keen on was the client driven migration which doesn't work from a DFS. As you decribed that was the exact problem with client driven migration that the locator couldn't find where it was stored.
12-02-2013 07:56 AM
You need to grant the service account elevated rights on the DFS share which holds the PST files.
you may also refer http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH50673
12-02-2013 01:15 PM
I tested the server migration under my mailbox and it worked flawlessly. The service account has full access to the DFS share.
I saw a post about using EVPM to do the PST migration. I created a INI file and run EVPM.exe agaist it but nothing happens. I followed the example in the utilities guide but nothing. I'm batting 0.000 today! I see nothing in the event viewer related PST migration tasks.
12-02-2013 11:36 PM
Please post a copy of your INI file that you used, and the parameters you called it with.
12-03-2013 06:14 AM
Here is the INI file I'm using:
12-03-2013 06:21 AM
Well...
12-03-2013 06:48 AM
Thanks Rob, Don't know how I didn't stumble upon your blog. Reading it you didn't use the MailboxDN to specify where to place imported email, you used VaultName instead. Reading the Utilities guide (10.0.3) I didn't see that as an option, only ArchiveName?
After discovering EVPM I'm going to create a collection of INI files to import my company PST files. It seems to be the most organized way to accomplish.
12-03-2013 06:51 AM
It has been a long time since I tested it or tried it out.. so try either/or those altneratives.. but definitely 'not' the [mailbox] section.
12-03-2013 07:35 AM
Thanks Rob, that solved that problem. However, now when I run EVPM I've getting the attached error. I've restarted the Migrator task in vauld admin console but it still throws the error. Any ideas?
12-03-2013 08:10 AM
There are a few other posts on the forum about 'odd' things happening with PSTs on DFS shares, can you try a different type of share, or try putting the file locally? Just to verify things are working in the 'simple' mode.
12-03-2013 08:37 AM
I get the same migration error when the files are moved locally. I've run the ini file in report mode as your blog suggests to test and I get a good report showing the the PST is ready for migration. This may be an issue for Symantec.
12-03-2013 08:52 AM
You could be right... maybe double check permissions on the PST file, make sure it is not read-only, and maybe even make sure that you can ingest the PST using the regular Import PST Wizard in the Vault Admin Console.
12-03-2013 11:15 AM
I used the PST Import wizard and the file has been in "Ready to copy" status for about an hour now. It has to be a related issue. The funny thing is that six months ago after I installed SP4 I tested pst migration and all worked well. I can't figure out what changed in that time to break the process.
12-03-2013 11:58 AM
That is PST driven migration.. Locate, collect, migrate.
I am suggesting you try the PST import wizard in the VAC. There are no statuses involved there.
12-03-2013 12:27 PM
OK, I've never done it that way but I figured it out. That works great however it imported email that violated my retention policy. When I did the server driven migration on this test pst file it worked great in that it didn't create shortcuts for email that was older than 1 year which violates the policy. I specified the proper retention category in the PST wizard but it still created the shortcuts. I'm assuming that when the mailbox archiving task runs that it will remove these shortcuts. However, I would prefer it not create the shortcuts.
12-05-2013 02:45 PM
So I got the server migrations working. The site settings for the PSTHOLD folder was set to only 10Gb and I was trying to import a 13Gb pst file. I'm still working with Symantec to try and resolve the EVPM script problems.
Can you help me interpret the pst log info. This info comes from a 2Gb pst that I imported.
12-05-2013 03:40 PM
To my mind, what you should do is:
a/ Check that the archive contains the right number of items (eg do a search using searcho2k.asp, or search.asp, or look at the vault store usage report)
b/ Sounds like all 50,000 items are >1 year old, therefore shortcuts weren't created (though the items were archived)
c/ When you choose the option to create shortcuts in the mailbox, it's by design that any items that aren't eligible for archiving (based on message class restrictions in the *pst* policy) will be moved to the mailbox at the end of ingestion.
d/ Why doesn't it state it didn't move the 50,000+ items? That's the way the product is right now -- you'd have to file an Idea in the Ideas section of the forum to suggest that really what should happen is that 'something' should say that they were archived but weren't shortcuted into the mailbox. [It *is* a valid point you raise by the way, I'm just explaining the process]