05-23-2006 02:54 PM
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-23-2006 03:01 PM
The catch is that the entire volume will be backed up (i.e. if you have a 72GB volume, but only 6GB used space, the full backup will be 72GB).
The major advantage however, and the place where Veritas/Symantec recommends using Flash Backups, is when you have a large number (millions) of small files. Flash backup will back up these files much faster since it's doing a block level backup rather than trying to pick up each file from the file system.
I'm not sure of the origon of the verbage "Flash Backup", but we have used it on a couple of Macromedia Flash Com. server where there are millions of 1-4k files on a single partition and backing them up using a standard Windows-NT policy results in very slow full backups (can't even finish in a 36 hour window) and virtually no incremental backup capability (since it always ends up with a client read timeout).
Lance
05-23-2006 03:01 PM
The catch is that the entire volume will be backed up (i.e. if you have a 72GB volume, but only 6GB used space, the full backup will be 72GB).
The major advantage however, and the place where Veritas/Symantec recommends using Flash Backups, is when you have a large number (millions) of small files. Flash backup will back up these files much faster since it's doing a block level backup rather than trying to pick up each file from the file system.
I'm not sure of the origon of the verbage "Flash Backup", but we have used it on a couple of Macromedia Flash Com. server where there are millions of 1-4k files on a single partition and backing them up using a standard Windows-NT policy results in very slow full backups (can't even finish in a 36 hour window) and virtually no incremental backup capability (since it always ends up with a client read timeout).
Lance
05-23-2006 03:18 PM
05-23-2006 03:26 PM
05-23-2006 03:29 PM
05-23-2006 03:30 PM
05-23-2006 11:55 PM