cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SLP AIR secondary duplication operation different retention to source.

Wulbur
Level 3

Hi - I have two Nbu domains both running 7.6 with AIR SLP's between each. The master on each domain is the DR master for the alternate domain

Site 1 has an SLP setup for the backup and replication operations and site 2 has an SLP the import and duplication.

I have a backup copy on disk for 6 months at the primary site which is replicated to disk at the secondary site and also held for 6 months. I then wish to duplicate to tape after 6 months at the secondary site when the disk image is due to expire, with the tape copy to be held for 1 year (from the backup start time).

SLP Source Retention Length Deferred STU
Backup Fixed 6 months No Disk
Replication Fixed 6 months No Disk
         
         
SLP Target Retention Length Deferred STU
Import Target 6 months - remote No Disk
Duplication Fixed 1 year Yes Tape

My understanding is that the SLP at the target domain needs to have a fixed and target retention for its operations.

I want to deploy deferred duplication using the Postpone creation of this copy until the source is about to expire check box, for the duplication operation but when I save the policy I get an error 1507, Invalid deferred operation flag -

http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=HOWTO105324

I think this is due to the source data i.e. the import operation, having to have a fixed retention.

If the SLP target’s import operation is changed to a fixed retention, we would then have to set the duplication operation to a target retention. The retention of the duplication operation therefore would be remote/the source retention and be only 6 months.

SLP Target Retention Length Deferred STU
Import Fixed 6 months No Disk
Duplication Target 6 months - remote Yes Tape

This does not give me the retention on tape using deferred duplication that I require as it is matching the source retention.

How do I set up the SLP for the target domain so that the secondary operation has a deferred and different retention to the source operation?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Wulbur
Level 3

Update for this issue - Symantec provided an eeb fix which allowed the retnetion from source to follow through to the target. The 1 week "default" retention continued to show up though but ultimately did not affect the image retention date/time. This is earmarked for a future release but for the time being it's doing what it says on the tin.

ISSUE: SLP discrepancies

ERROR CODE/MESSAGE: SLP with remote retention and deferred duplications did not follow the retention rules. Default 1 week retention was applied regardless of retention settings.

ENVIRONMENT/CONDITIONS: NetBackup 7.6.0.2/ SUSE 6.1 (upgraded to 7.6.0.4)

EVIDENCE: NBSU and NetBackup logs

SOLUTION/WORKAROUND: ETRACK provided to resolve issue with media retention in SLP

REFERENCE: ETRACK 3737475

 

View solution in original post

9 REPLIES 9

Andrew_Madsen
Level 6
Partner

A couple of questions:

  1. Did you us an automatically created import SLP?
  2. You say you want to copy the image to tap after six months at the DR site and " tape copy to be held for 1 year (from the backup start time)." You are ware that the retention is triggered from the day the copy is made not the day the backup was run?

In your first scenario you would backup, replicate, hold for six months, and then hold for a year longer. A full 18 months from when the backup was taken.

Your second scenario is closer to what you want, I believe and is doable by making the changes you set out.

Wulbur
Level 3

Hi,

1. I'm not sure the SLP was created for us by a third party. I suspected it has been automatically created.

2. I was under the impression the duplication operation would be from the start date of the original backup and not actually the start time of the SLP duplication operation.

I have a call with support as we had our SLP setup as per the second scenario. When the duplication operation started after 6 months of being held on disk, the retention of the tape copy was one week (it looked like it was defaulting to the first selection for target retention which was greyed out) after the orginal backup date and this was in the past so subsequently it expired the image instantly.

From this it led me to believe the secondary operation retention was based on the backup start time from the source SLP.

I changed the SLP as per scenario 1 but the duplication jobs do not defer as I can not save the SLP. Both scenarios are not giving me the retention I require.

Wulbur
Level 3
I should make clear that the intention is for the duplication operation to tape to be retained for 6 months after the disk copy expires so in total the replicated backup image is held for 1 year. 6 months on disk then the next 6 months on tape at the secondary domain.

watsons
Level 6

I just tested a scenario based on your setting.. on target side:

import - target retention period

duplication - 6 months (fixed)

After the import & duplication on target completed, I check the expiration date of the image on target master server, both the 1st (replicated) & 2nd (duplicated again) have the same expiry date, that means the 6 month retention period is relative to the target master server, or relative to the source image creation time.

Then, I changed the duplication retention to 1 year now.. and get a replicated image.

This time the duplication copy (on target) will have a retention period of 1 year relative to the image creation time, which I think it's what you want it to be. 

Anyhow, the admin guide did not describe up to this scenario (duplication of replication on target). 

Wulbur
Level 3

Hi - thanks for your input. I also think the retention period of the duplicated copy is relative to the source image creation time.

My SLP's are showing the same output as you have tested when the duplication operation is fixed for 1 year.

However I want the duplication operation to be deferred until the replicated disk copy at the target is about to expire. This way we have the image on the target disk for 6 months and then when this is due to expire the duplication operation to tape starts and is held for a further 6 months. This retains the image for 1 year in total  - 6 months on disk then 6 months on tape.

The problem I'm seeing is that I can not save the SLP for this deferred duplication (using the Postpone creation of this copy until the source is about to expire check box) as when I save the policy I get an error 1507, Invalid deferred operation flag.

The technote for 1507, states the source copy (import operation in my SLP) has to have a fixed retention. This in turn means the duplication operation for my target SLP must have a target retention.

It's looking to me as though the retention of a secondary deferred duplication operation can not be different to the primary import operation. There must be a way around this otherwise it doesn't do what it say's on the tin.

 

Wulbur
Level 3

This is currently with support where it has been acknowledged that the remote retetnion is not being passed through to the target domains which is where the remote retention is expected to be honoured with the secondary SLP operations.

An eeb is being worked on.

Wulbur
Level 3

Update for this issue - Symantec provided an eeb fix which allowed the retnetion from source to follow through to the target. The 1 week "default" retention continued to show up though but ultimately did not affect the image retention date/time. This is earmarked for a future release but for the time being it's doing what it says on the tin.

ISSUE: SLP discrepancies

ERROR CODE/MESSAGE: SLP with remote retention and deferred duplications did not follow the retention rules. Default 1 week retention was applied regardless of retention settings.

ENVIRONMENT/CONDITIONS: NetBackup 7.6.0.2/ SUSE 6.1 (upgraded to 7.6.0.4)

EVIDENCE: NBSU and NetBackup logs

SOLUTION/WORKAROUND: ETRACK provided to resolve issue with media retention in SLP

REFERENCE: ETRACK 3737475

 

sdo
Moderator
Moderator
Partner    VIP    Certified

Thanks for sharing the update.

CRZ
Level 6
Employee Accredited Certified

We'll probably see a Tech Alert on this one in coming weeks, so if anybody sees what was happening to Wulbur happening in THEIR environment, please do not hesitate to open a case and request the EEB mentioned in this thread!