05-29-2007 01:23 AM
06-07-2007 06:33 AM
06-07-2007 06:51 AM
Frank,
I’ll see what I can get done about the tech notes.
As for the wizard idea, please submit your thoughts to http://enhancement.symantec.com . Many of our enhancements to Backup Exec come from customer requests submitted to the site, so I encourage you to take advantage of it.
Symantec Product Feedback
Help us improve Symantec products by providing us with your suggestions and ideas. Feedback will be reviewed by the appropriate product team to evaluate trends and to identify the most common suggestions across the entire customer base. Your ideas can impact Symantec products in many ways, and might even be incorporated into future product releases.
06-08-2007 07:50 AM
06-08-2007 08:53 AM
06-08-2007 09:34 AM
I understand the concern with having the user account listed in the GAL. Trust us, if it were possible to not have this account in the GAL, then wouldn't make it a requirement.
There is a limitation with the MAPI interface that we use to populate the restore selections that require this address to not be hidden. MAPI will not work if the user is hidden. Since we are at the hands of MAPI, there is no way that we can work around that.
When the account is hidden from the GAL, the MAPI calls we attempt are blocked by Exchange, which is what generates the 'access is denied' error.
If you are not using a policy-based Exchange backup, this could explain why the failures only occurred on the full backups. GRT will only work with policy-based incremental and differential backups. Standard backups which perform incremental and differential backups of Exchange cannot use GRT, which in turn will not use MAPI.
Glad to hear that it is working for, and hopefully I've been able to explain why we make this a requirement.
Let us know if you need anything further.
06-08-2007 12:57 PM
06-12-2007 09:03 AM
06-26-2007 01:58 PM
"I have reviewed the logs and performed research with our Developers and found that they have seen this issue with Exchange and CPS when the Backup Exec server (Media server) is running Windows 2003 x64 in two other sites so far. This particular issue has not been seen in Windows 2003 32bit. There is a bug case already created for this issue, right now it still under investigation by our developers. As it stand today the only work around this issue is to run the Exchange backup with the CPS option disabled." (sic).
A backline manager spoke with me. He was nice. He tells me the issue is actively being worked on, but other, more critical issues "are in the way."
They believe the problem is only manifested with Exchange 2003.
06-27-2007 03:15 AM
06-27-2007 06:06 AM
06-27-2007 11:01 PM
07-06-2007 07:33 AM
07-06-2007 07:59 AM
07-06-2007 08:01 AM
07-09-2007 12:55 AM
07-16-2007 12:26 AM
09-16-2007 02:05 PM
09-17-2007 05:45 AM
09-17-2007 07:17 AM
09-17-2007 11:35 AM